Changes in myocardial infarction guideline adherence as a function of patient risk: an end to paradoxical care?

[1]  Robert Parrish,et al.  Guideline-based standardized care is associated with substantially lower mortality in medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: the American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) Projects in Michigan. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  F. McAlister.  Applying Evidence to Patient Care: From Black and White to Shades of Grey , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  M. Mamdani,et al.  Lipid-lowering therapy with statins in high-risk elderly patients: the treatment-risk paradox. , 2004, JAMA.

[4]  P. Austin,et al.  Missed opportunities in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction: an assessment of the effects of statin underprescribing on mortality. , 2006, American heart journal.

[5]  C. Cannon,et al.  Are quality improvements associated with the Get With the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease (GWTG-CAD) program sustained over time? A longitudinal comparison of GWTG-CAD hospitals versus non-GWTG-CAD hospitals. , 2010, American heart journal.

[6]  R. Califf,et al.  The influence of risk status on guideline adherence for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. , 2006, American heart journal.

[7]  J. Spertus,et al.  Translating evidence into practice: are we neglecting the neediest? , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  F. McAlister,et al.  Exploring the treatment-risk paradox in coronary disease. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  F. McAlister,et al.  The treatment and prevention of coronary heart disease in Canada: do older patients receive efficacious therapies? The Clinical Quality Improvement Network (CQIN) Investigators. , 1999, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[11]  A. Yan,et al.  Management patterns in relation to risk stratification among patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  F. McAlister,et al.  The Treatment and Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in Canada: Do Older Patients Receive Efficacious Therapies? , 1999 .

[13]  K. Eagle,et al.  A quality guarantee in acute coronary syndromes: the American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice program taken real-time. , 2007, American heart journal.

[14]  R. Califf,et al.  Recent trends in the care of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: insights from the CRUSADE initiative. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  C. Cannon,et al.  An organized approach to improvement in guideline adherence for acute myocardial infarction: results with the Get With The Guidelines quality improvement program. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.