Vernier acuity is less than grating acuity in 2- and 3-month-olds

Vernier acuity and grating acuity were measured longitudinally starting at 1 or 2 months of age in 22 infants, using a two-alternative, forced-choice preferential looking technique. For vernier acuity, the motion-sound display was employed. For grating acuity, a preferential looking method was employed. Steps of the stimulus (vernier offset and spatial frequency of the grating) and procedures were basically identical between the two acuity tests. The range of stimuli was set so as to compare the two acuities at younger ages. Results show: vernier acuity is less than grating acuity at 11-12 weeks of age or younger, and the developmental rate of vernier acuity is greater than that of grating acuity in the first half-year of life. To interpret the data, it was speculated that: the mean sampling distance (center-to-center distance between receptive fields) may influence vernier acuity more than grating acuity, whereas the size of the receptive field may influence grating acuity more than vernier acuity: when the mean sampling distance is large relative to the size of the receptive field, vernier acuity may be less than grating acuity. Thus, the neonatal visual system, just as the visual system in the periphery and in strabismic amblyopia, may be characterized by spatial undersampling.

[1]  R Held,et al.  Preferential Looking Acuity in Infants from Two to Fifty‐Eight Weeks of Age , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[2]  Velma Dobson,et al.  Visual acuity in human infants: A review and comparison of behavioral and electrophysiological studies , 1978, Vision Research.

[3]  Rusoff Ac,et al.  Development of receptive-field properties of retinal ganglion cells in kittens. , 1977 .

[4]  M S Banks,et al.  Acuity and contrast sensitivity in 1-, 2-, and 3-month-old human infants. , 1978, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  R Held,et al.  Development of visual resolution. , 1979, Canadian journal of psychology.

[6]  J Atkinson,et al.  Acuity, contrast sensitivity and accommodation in infants , 1981 .

[7]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain hyperacuity , 1986, Vision Research.

[8]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Development of single-neuron responses in kitten's lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Ida Mann,et al.  The Development of the Human Eye , 1928, Nature.

[10]  H. Loos,et al.  Synaptogenesis in human visual cortex — evidence for synapse elimination during normal development , 1982, Neuroscience Letters.

[11]  Richard Held,et al.  Infant visual acuity and its meridional variation , 1978, Vision Research.

[12]  B. Cragg,et al.  The development of synapses in the visual system of the cat , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  R. L. Fantz,et al.  A visual acuity test for infants under six months of age , 1959 .

[14]  K. Albus,et al.  Early post‐natal development of neuronal function in the kitten's visual cortex: a laminar analysis. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[16]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and amblyopia , 1985, Vision Research.

[17]  J. Flynn,et al.  Physiological properties of retinal ganglion cells of 3-week-old kittens , 1977, Vision Research.

[18]  P Salapatek,et al.  Infant visual acuity as a function of viewing distance. , 1976, Child development.

[19]  Velma Dobson,et al.  Visual acuity in human infants assessed with stationary stripes and phase-alternated checkerboards , 1978, Vision Research.

[20]  H. Wilson,et al.  Modified line-element theory for spatial-frequency and width discrimination. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  G. Westheimer.  The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field , 1982, Vision Research.

[22]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Development of vernier acuity in infants , 1984, Vision Research.

[23]  J Hirsch,et al.  Limits of spatial-frequency discrimination as evidence of neural interpolation. , 1982, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[24]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Infant contrast sensitivity evaluated by evoked potentials , 1978, Brain Research.

[25]  M. Fahle,et al.  Naso-temporal asymmetry of visual perception and of the visual cortex , 1988, Vision Research.

[26]  JANETTE ATKINSON,et al.  Acuity and contrast sensivity of infant vision , 1974, Nature.

[27]  D M Levi,et al.  Differences in vernier discrimination for grating between strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes. , 1982, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  S. Levay,et al.  Ocular dominance columns and their development in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex: A quantitative study , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[29]  D. Teller,et al.  Visual acuity for vertical and diagonal gratings in human infants. , 1974, Vision research.

[30]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Hyperacuity and amblyopia , 1982, Nature.