Effects of Using Different Sources of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System Data on Urban Stormwater 2D–1D Modeling

Remote sensing (RS) and geographic information system (GIS) data is increasingly used in urban stormwater modeling. The undirected use of such data may waste economic and human resources. In order to provide guidance for practitioners to efficiently use different data collection resources, as well as give a reference for future works, this paper aims to assess the effects of using free access GIS data and ad hoc RS data on urban 2D–1D stormwater modeling. The 2D-surface Two-dimensional Runoff, Erosion, and Export model (TREX) model was published in Science of the Total Environment in 2008. The 1D-sewer CANOE (Logiciel integre de conception et de diagnostic des reseaux d’assainissement) model was published in Journal of Hydrology in 2004. The two models are integrated in the TRENOE (TREX-CANOE) platform. The modeling approach is applied to a small urban catchment near Paris (Le Perreux sur Marne, 0.12 km2). Simulation results reveal that the detailed land-use information derived from multiple data sources is a crucial factor for accurate simulations. Nevertheless, using the very high resolution LiDAR (light detection and ranging) data is not equally significant for the water flow simulations at sewage outlets. Finally, we suggest that using the free access GIS data accompanying the urban sewer network design might be an acceptable low-cost solution for accurate urban 2D–1D stormwater modeling during moderate rainfall events. Further studies of urban stormwater modeling could focus on the development of “suitable” models with “enough” input data, depending on the management/research objectives.

[1]  A Refsgaard,et al.  Flood analysis in mixed-urban areas reflecting interactions with the complete water cycle through coupled hydrologic-hydraulic modelling. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  Okke Batelaan,et al.  Hydrological modelling of urbanized catchments: A review and future directions , 2015 .

[3]  S. Ustin,et al.  Rainfall Interception by Sacramento's Urban Forest , 1998, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[4]  Bahman Soheilian,et al.  Semi-Automatic Road/Pavement Modeling using Mobile Laser Scanning , 2013 .

[5]  Giuliano Di Baldassarre,et al.  Is the current flood of data enough? A treatise on research needs for the improvement of flood modelling , 2012 .

[6]  P. Bates Integrating remote sensing data with flood inundation models: how far have we got? , 2012 .

[7]  J. Refsgaard,et al.  Coupling of a distributed hydrological model with an urban storm water model for impact analysis of forced infiltration , 2015 .

[8]  Bahman Soheilian,et al.  Road Marking Extraction Using a MODEL&DATA-DRIVEN Rj-Mcmc , 2015 .

[9]  V. Tsihrintzis,et al.  Modeling and Management of Urban Stormwater Runoff Quality: A Review , 1997 .

[10]  B. Sanders,et al.  Two-dimensional, high-resolution modeling of urban dam-break flooding: A case study of Baldwin Hills, California , 2009 .

[11]  C. Sampson,et al.  Benchmarking urban flood models of varying complexity and scale using high resolution terrestrial LiDAR data , 2011 .

[12]  H. Andrieu,et al.  Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: A state of the art , 2013 .

[13]  N. David,et al.  Stereopolis II: A multi-purpose and multi-sensor 3D mobile mapping system for street visualisation and 3D metrology , 2014 .

[14]  M. Velleux,et al.  TREX: spatially distributed model to assess watershed contaminant transport and fate. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  W. Green,et al.  Studies on Soil Phyics. , 1911, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[16]  S Djordjević,et al.  SIPSON--simulation of interaction between pipe flow and surface overland flow in networks. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[17]  Z. Vojinovic,et al.  On the use of 1D and coupled 1D-2D modelling approaches for assessment of flood damage in urban areas , 2009 .

[18]  Hervé Le Men,et al.  Scale-Sets Image Analysis , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[19]  A. Martínez-Graña,et al.  Analysis of the Hazard, Vulnerability, and Exposure to the Risk of Flooding (Alba de Yeltes, Salamanca, Spain) , 2017 .

[20]  G. Chebbo,et al.  New insights into the urban washoff process with detailed physical modelling. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  G. Chebbo,et al.  A new approach of monitoring and physically-based modelling to investigate urban wash-off process on a road catchment near Paris. , 2016, Water research.

[22]  Julien Lhomme,et al.  Applying a GIS-based geomorphological routing model in urban catchments , 2004 .

[23]  P. Bates,et al.  Comparing the performance of a 2‐D finite element and a 2‐D finite volume model of floodplain inundation using airborne SAR imagery , 2007 .

[24]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .