Survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed partial dentures with cantilevers: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE The objective of the present systematic review was to analyze the potential effect of incorporation of cantilever extensions on the survival rate of implant-supported fixed partial dental prostheses (FPDPs) and the incidence of technical and biological complications, as reported in longitudinal studies with at least 5 years of follow-up. METHODS A MEDLINE search was conducted up to and including November 2008 for longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up period of at least 5 years. Two reviewers performed screening and data abstraction independently. Prosthesis-based data on survival/failure rate, technical complications (prosthesis-related problems, implant loss) and biological complications (marginal bone loss) were analyzed. RESULTS The search provided 103 titles with abstract. Full-text analysis was performed of 12 articles, out of which three were finally included. Two of the studies had a prospective or retrospective case-control design, whereas the third was a prospective cohort study. The 5-year survival rate of cantilever FPDPs varied between 89.9% and 92.7% (weighted mean 91.9%), with implant fracture as the main cause for failures. The corresponding survival rate for FPDPs without cantilever extensions was 96.3-96.2% (weighted mean 95.8%). Technical complications related to the supra-constructions in the three included studies were reported to occur at a frequency of 13-26% (weighted mean 20.3%) for cantilever FPDPs compared with 0-12% (9.7%) for non-cantilever FPDPs. The most common complications were minor porcelain fractures and bridge-screw loosening. For cantilever FPDPs, the 5-year event-free survival rate varied between 66.7% and 79.2% (weighted mean 71.7%) and between 83.1% and 96.3% (weighted mean 85.9%) for non-cantilever FPDPs. No statistically significant differences were reported with regard to peri-implant bone-level change between the two prosthetic groups, either at the prosthesis or at the implant level. CONCLUSION Data on implant-supported FPDPs with cantilever extensions are limited and therefore survival and complication rates should be interpreted with caution. The incorporation of cantilevers into implant-borne prostheses may be associated with a higher incidence of minor technical complications.

[1]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.

[2]  J. Bernard,et al.  A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  G A Niznick,et al.  Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[4]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[5]  T Albrektsson,et al.  A multicenter report on osseointegrated oral implants. , 1988, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  Bo Rangert,et al.  Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2007, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  Nicola U Zitzmann,et al.  Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[8]  Bjarni E Pjetursson,et al.  A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[9]  D van Steenberghe,et al.  Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system. , 1992, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  F. Isidor,et al.  Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[12]  Björn Klinge,et al.  A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. , 2002, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[13]  G Zarb,et al.  The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. , 1986, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  A. Sertgöz,et al.  Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  O. Miyakawa,et al.  Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[16]  U. Lekholm,et al.  Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous , 1994 .

[17]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[18]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implants subjected to static load of different duration. A study in the dog (III). , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[19]  N P Lang,et al.  Prosthetic treatment planning on the basis of scientific evidence. , 2008, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[20]  Anders Ekfeldt,et al.  Implant-supported fixed partial prostheses: a retrospective study. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[21]  Thomas Gerds,et al.  Technical complications of implant-supported fixed partial dentures in partially edentulous cases after an average observation period of 5 years. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[22]  P J Becker,et al.  Survival of fixed implant-supported prostheses related to cantilever lengths. , 1994, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[23]  J. Wennström,et al.  Bone level change at implant-supported fixed partial dentures with and without cantilever extension after 5 years in function. , 2004, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[24]  G. Carlsson,et al.  Association between Marginal Bone Loss around Osseointegrated Mandibular Implants and Smoking Habits: A 10-year Follow-up Study , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[25]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implants subjected to static load. A study in the dog (I). , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[26]  M. Chiapasco,et al.  Implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses in partially edentulous arches. A seven-year prospective study. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[27]  R. M. Watson,et al.  Maintenance requirements of implant-supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant-supported fixed prostheses, natural teeth, or complete dentures: a 5-year retrospective study. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[28]  Christoph H F Hämmerle,et al.  Bone level changes at implants supporting crowns or fixed partial dentures with or without cantilevers. , 2008, Clinical oral implants research.

[29]  Bjarni E Pjetursson,et al.  A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin-bonded bridges after an observation period of at least 5 years , 2008, BDJ.

[30]  U. Belser,et al.  Prosthetic complications with dental implants: from an up-to-8-year experience in private practice. , 2006, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[31]  Georges Tawil,et al.  Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants. , 2006, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[32]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. II. Combined tooth--implant-supported FPDs. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[33]  T. Jemt,et al.  Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[34]  C. M. Becker Cantilever fixed prostheses utilizing dental implants: a 10-year retrospective analysis. , 2004, Quintessence international.

[35]  F. Isidor,et al.  Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[36]  B. Kucey Implant placement in prosthodontics practice: a five-year retrospective study. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[37]  P. Branemark,et al.  Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. , 1990, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.