Low-Budget Instrumentation of a Conventional Leg Press to Measure Reliable Isometric-Strength Capacity.

Maximum strength and rate of force development (RFD) are 2 important strength characteristics for everyday tasks and athletic performance. Measurements of both parameters must be reliable. Expensive isokinetic devices with isometric modes are often used. The possibility of cost-effective measurements in a practical setting would facilitate quality control. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of measurements of maximum isometric strength (Fmax) and RFD on a conventional leg press. Sixteen subjects (23 ± 2 y, 1.68 ± 0.05 m, 59 ± 5 kg) were tested twice within 1 session. After warm-up, subjects performed 2 times 5 trials eliciting maximum voluntary isometric contractions on an instrumented leg press (1- and 2-legged randomized). Fmax (N) and RFD (N/s) were extracted from force-time curves. Reliability was determined for Fmax and RFD by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the test-retest variability (TRV), and the bias and limits of agreement. Reliability measures revealed good to excellent ICCs of .80-.93. TRV showed mean differences between measurement sessions of 0.4-6.9%. The systematic error was low compared with the absolute mean values (Fmax 5-6%, RFD 1-4%). The implementation of a force transducer into a conventional leg press provides a viable procedure to assess Fmax and RFD. Both performance parameters can be assessed with good to excellent reliability allowing quality control of interventions.

[1]  P. Kannus,et al.  Isokinetic Evaluation of Muscular Performance , 1994, International journal of sports medicine.

[2]  M. Callaghan,et al.  The reproducibility of multi-joint isokinetic and isometric assessments in a healthy and patient population. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  A Stockmarr,et al.  Isokinetic and isometric muscle strength in a healthy population with special reference to age and gender , 2009, Acta physiologica.

[4]  Jason R. Bentley,et al.  Test Battery Designed to Quickly and Safely Assess Diverse Indices of Neuromuscular Function After Unweighting , 2011, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[5]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[6]  E. Simonsen,et al.  Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[7]  Wolfgang Taube,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF BALLISTIC VERSUS SENSORIMOTOR TRAINING ON RATE OF FORCE DEVELOPMENT AND NEURAL ACTIVATION IN HUMANS , 2007, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[8]  H. Baur,et al.  Reproducibility of isokinetic single- and multi-joint strength measurements in healthy and injured athletes , 2007 .

[9]  L. Radlinger,et al.  Isometric rate of force development, maximum voluntary contraction, and balance in women with and without joint hypermobility. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  H. Baur,et al.  Plantar pressure trigger for reliable nerve stimulus application during dynamic H-reflex measurements. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[11]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.