EXTENDING GEOSPATIAL REPOSITORIES WITH GEOSEMANTIC PROXIMITY FUNCTIONALITIES TO FACILITATE THE INTEROPERABILITY OF GEOSPATIAL DATA

Today, with the common availability of Internet technologies, interoperability of geospatial data has become a necessity for sharing and integrating geospatial data. More specifically, it is seen as a solution to solve syntactic, structural, semantic, geometric and temporal heterogeneities between data sources. In Canada, we observe such heterogeneities from existing geospatial databases. For example, Vegetation , Trees , Wooded area , Wooded area , Milieu boise and Zone boisee (unknown geometry), found in different geospatial data specifications, describe the same type of phenomena. Recently, we have proposed a conceptual framework for geospatial data interoperability based on human communication concepts. This framework introduces the idea of geosemantic proximity, which provides reasoning capabilities to assess the semantic, geometric, and temporal similarities between geospatial concepts and geospatial conceptual representations. In the present paper, we review the conceptual framework and present an architecture of a system based on this framework. In fact, the architecture uses a geospatial repository, namely Perceptory, as a data source’s ontology upon which we add geosemantic proximity functionalities. These functionalities evaluate the similarity of the information stored in the data source with the information required by another one in order to facilitate the interoperability of geospatial data.

[1]  Y. Bédard,et al.  Geosemantic Proximity, a Component of Spatial Data Interoperability , 2001 .

[2]  W. Feek Communication works. , 1996, AIDS/STD health promotion exchange.

[3]  David Krech,et al.  Perceiving the world. , 1948 .

[4]  ShethAmit,et al.  Semantic and schematic similarities between database objects: a context-based approach , 1996, VLDB 1996.

[5]  Robert Laurini Spatial Multi-Database Topological Continuity and Indexing: A Step Towards Seamless GIS Data Interoperability , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Formal Ontology and Information Systems , 1998 .

[7]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[9]  Yvan Bédard,et al.  Modelling geospatial application databases using UML-based repositories aligned with international standards in geomatics , 2000, GIS '00.

[10]  Yvan Bedard,et al.  A STUDY OF THE NATURE OF DATA USING A COMMUNICATION-BASED CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF LAND INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 1986 .

[11]  Clifford A. Kottman The Open GIS Consortium and Progress Toward Interoperability in Gis , 1999 .

[12]  Barry Smith,et al.  Ontology with Human Subjects Testing: An Empirical Investigation of Geographic Categories , 1998 .

[13]  Max J. Egenhofer Introduction: Theory and Concepts , 1999 .

[14]  Achille C. Varzi,et al.  Ontological Tools for Geographic Representation , 1998 .

[15]  David M. Mark,et al.  The 9-Intersection: Formalism and Its Use for Natural-Language Spatial Predicates (94-1) - eScholarship , 1994 .

[16]  Vipul Kashyap,et al.  Semantic and schematic similarities between database objects: a context-based approach , 1996, The VLDB Journal.

[17]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  A Formal Ontology of Properties (Preliminary Version) , 2000 .

[18]  Y. Bédard VISUAL MODELLING OF SPATIAL DATABASES: TOWARDS SPATIAL PVL AND UML , 1999 .

[19]  N. Guarino,et al.  Formal Ontology in Information Systems : Proceedings of the First International Conference(FOIS'98), June 6-8, Trento, Italy , 1998 .

[20]  Y. A. Bishr,et al.  Semantic aspects of interoperable GIS , 1997 .

[21]  Fabien Robineau,et al.  OpenGIS Simple Features Specification For SQL, Revision 0 , 1997 .