A Dose-Response Modeling Approach Shows That Effects From Mixture Exposure to the Skin Sensitizers Isoeugenol and Cinnamal Are in Line With Dose Addition and Not With Synergism.

Currently, hazard characterization of skin sensitizers is based on data obtained from studies examining single chemicals. Many consumer products, however, contain mixtures of sensitizers that might interact in such a way that the response induced by a substance is higher than predicted in the hazard assessment. To assess interaction of skin sensitizers in a mixture, a dose-response modeling approach is applied. With this approach, it is possible to assess whether or not responses from mixtures of sensitizers can be predicted from the dose-response information obtained from individual chemicals using dose addition. We selected the skin sensitizers isoeugenol and cinnamal, frequently occurring together in consumer products, to be examined in an adjusted local lymph node assay (LLNA). Cell number and cytokine production (IL-10 and IFN-γ) of the auricular lymph nodes were measured as hallmarks of the skin sensitization response. We found that dose addition for these 2 skin sensitizers closely predicted the effects from mixtures of both chemicals across the broad dose range tested. Hence, isoeugenol and cinnamal show no synergistic effects in the LLNA. Therefore, hazard assessment and risk assessment of these substances can be performed without taking into account mixture exposure.

[1]  C. Geisler,et al.  Enhanced sensitization and elicitation responses caused by mixtures of common fragrance allergens , 2011, Contact dermatitis.

[2]  Wout Slob,et al.  Dose-response modeling of continuous endpoints. , 2002, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[3]  M. Berenbaum The expected effect of a combination of agents: the general solution. , 1985, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  C McNamara,et al.  European consumer exposure to cosmetic products, a framework for conducting population exposure assessments. , 2007, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[5]  W. Uter,et al.  Coupled exposure to ingredients of cosmetic products: I. Fragrances , 2013, Contact dermatitis.

[6]  T. Jakob,et al.  Mechanisms of chemical‐induced innate immunity in allergic contact dermatitis , 2011, Allergy.

[7]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients. , 2008, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[8]  Andreas Natsch,et al.  The Nrf2-Keap1-ARE toxicity pathway as a cellular sensor for skin sensitizers--functional relevance and a hypothesis on innate reactions to skin sensitizers. , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[9]  I Kimber,et al.  Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data. , 2001, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[10]  M. Gibney,et al.  European consumer exposure to cosmetic products, a framework for conducting population exposure assessments Part 2. , 2011, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[11]  Wout Slob,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Calculating Confidence Intervals for the Benchmark Dose , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  I Kimber,et al.  Vehicle effects on skin sensitizing potency of four chemicals: assessment using the local lymph node assay , 2001, International journal of cosmetic science.

[13]  D. Basketter,et al.  Influence of sodium lauryl sulphate on 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene-induced lymph node activation. , 1993, Toxicology.

[14]  Wout Slob,et al.  Shape and steepness of toxicological dose–response relationships of continuous endpoints , 2014, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[15]  D. Basketter,et al.  Irritant dermatitis, irritancy and its role in allergic contact dermatitis , 2002, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[16]  T. Gray,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay: results of an inter-laboratory trial. , 1991, Toxicology letters.

[17]  Marina A. Freudenberg,et al.  Contact Sensitizers Induce Skin Inflammation via ROS Production and Hyaluronic Acid Degradation , 2012, PloS one.

[18]  W. Uter,et al.  Coupled exposure to ingredients of cosmetic products: II. Preservatives , 2014, Contact dermatitis.

[19]  W. D. de Jong,et al.  Determination of the sensitising activity of the rubber contact sensitisers TMTD, ZDMC, MBT and DEA in a modified local lymph node assay and the effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate pretreatment on local lymph node responses. , 2002, Toxicology.

[20]  W. Uter,et al.  Coupled exposure to ingredients of cosmetic products: III. Ultraviolet filters , 2014, Contact dermatitis.

[21]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Allergic Contact Dermatitis , 1998, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[22]  W. Slob,et al.  Toxicodynamic analysis of the combined cholinesterase inhibition by paraoxon and methamidophos in human whole blood. , 2009, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.