Convolutional neural network based on SMILES representation of compounds for detecting chemical motif

BackgroundPrevious studies have suggested deep learning to be a highly effective approach for screening lead compounds for new drugs. Several deep learning models have been developed by addressing the use of various kinds of fingerprints and graph convolution architectures. However, these methods are either advantageous or disadvantageous depending on whether they (1) can distinguish structural differences including chirality of compounds, and (2) can automatically discover effective features.ResultsWe developed another deep learning model for compound classification. In this method, we constructed a distributed representation of compounds based on the SMILES notation, which linearly represents a compound structure, and applied the SMILES-based representation to a convolutional neural network (CNN). The use of SMILES allows us to process all types of compounds while incorporating a broad range of structure information, and representation learning by CNN automatically acquires a low-dimensional representation of input features. In a benchmark experiment using the TOX 21 dataset, our method outperformed conventional fingerprint methods, and performed comparably against the winning model of the TOX 21 Challenge. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the chemical space consisting of the features learned by SMILES-based representation learning adequately expressed a richer feature space that enabled the accurate discrimination of compounds. Using motif detection with the learned filters, not only important known structures (motifs) such as protein-binding sites but also structures of unknown functional groups were detected.ConclusionsThe source code of our SMILES-based convolutional neural network software in the deep learning framework Chainer is available at http://www.dna.bio.keio.ac.jp/smiles/, and the dataset used for performance evaluation in this work is available at the same URL.

[1]  Hongbin Yang,et al.  In Silico Prediction of Chemicals Binding to Aromatase with Machine Learning Methods. , 2017, Chemical research in toxicology.

[2]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Convolutional Networks on Graphs for Learning Molecular Fingerprints , 2015, NIPS.

[3]  David Rogers,et al.  Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[4]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  Molecular graph convolutions: moving beyond fingerprints , 2016, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[5]  Ah Chung Tsoi,et al.  The Graph Neural Network Model , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[6]  David R. Kelley,et al.  Basset: learning the regulatory code of the accessible genome with deep convolutional neural networks , 2015, bioRxiv.

[7]  Beilun Wang,et al.  Deep Motif Dashboard: Visualizing and Understanding Genomic Sequences Using Deep Neural Networks , 2016, PSB.

[8]  Ruili Huang,et al.  Tox21Challenge to Build Predictive Models of Nuclear Receptor and Stress Response Pathways as Mediated by Exposure to Environmental Chemicals and Drugs , 2016, Front. Environ. Sci..

[9]  David K. Gifford,et al.  Convolutional neural network architectures for predicting DNA–protein binding , 2016, Bioinform..

[10]  Kenta Oono,et al.  Chainer : a Next-Generation Open Source Framework for Deep Learning , 2015 .

[11]  Günter Klambauer,et al.  DeepTox: Toxicity Prediction using Deep Learning , 2016, Front. Environ. Sci..

[12]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Deep Architectures and Deep Learning in Chemoinformatics: The Prediction of Aqueous Solubility for Drug-Like Molecules , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[13]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  David Weininger,et al.  SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules , 1988, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[15]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[16]  W. Graham Richards,et al.  Ultrafast shape recognition to search compound databases for similar molecular shapes , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[17]  Alessio Micheli,et al.  Neural Network for Graphs: A Contextual Constructive Approach , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[18]  Robert P. Sheridan,et al.  Deep Neural Nets as a Method for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[19]  O. Troyanskaya,et al.  Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning–based sequence model , 2015, Nature Methods.

[20]  B. Frey,et al.  Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  Qiang Chen,et al.  Network In Network , 2013, ICLR.

[22]  P. Hawkins,et al.  Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.