Young children apply the homophily principle to their reasoning about social relationships.

People who are in close relationships tend to do and like the same things, a phenomenon termed the "homophily principle." The present research probed for evidence of the homophily principle in 4- to 6-year-old children. Across two experiments, participants (N = 327; 166 girls, 161 boys; located in the Midwestern United States) were asked to predict the closeness of two people based on their preferences. Participants in Experiment 1 indicated that people with a shared preference or a shared dispreference were more closely affiliated than people whose preferences diverged, suggesting inferences of homophily. Furthermore, children were not only relying on the emotional valences expressed: They expected people with a shared preference to be closer than people who expressed positive emotions about different items and expected people with a shared dispreference to be closer than people who expressed negative emotions about different items. Experiment 2 replicated and extended the main findings of Experiment 1 with more naturalistic stimuli. The present studies provide strong evidence that young children apply the homophily principle to their reasoning about social relationships. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

[1]  Mel Stanfill.  Dislike-Minded: Media, Audiences, and the Dynamics of Taste , 2023, The Communication Review.

[2]  Yarrow Dunham,et al.  Are Category Labels Primary? Children Use Similarities to Reason About Social Groups. , 2020, Developmental science.

[3]  J. Uitermark,et al.  Lifestyle Enclaves in the Instagram City? , 2020 .

[4]  A. Shaw,et al.  Children use similarity, propinquity, and loyalty to predict which people are friends. , 2019, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[5]  Tianshu Sun,et al.  Displaying things in common to encourage friendship formation: A large randomized field experiment , 2019, Quantitative Marketing and Economics.

[6]  N. Afshordi.  Children's Inferences About Friendship and Shared Preferences Based on Reported Information. , 2019, Child development.

[7]  B. Laursen.  Making and Keeping Friends: The Importance of Being Similar , 2017 .

[8]  Katherine D. Kinzler,et al.  Early emerging system for reasoning about the social nature of food , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  F. Warneken,et al.  Children tell white lies to make others feel better. , 2015, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[10]  Ian Oakley,et al.  Predicting Tie Strength with the Facebook API , 2014, Panhellenic Conference on Informatics.

[11]  T. Graepel,et al.  Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Sharing a joke: The effects of a similar sense of humor on affiliation and altruism , 2013 .

[13]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  The Evolution of Homophily , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[14]  K. Wynn,et al.  Origins of “Us” versus “Them”: Prelinguistic infants prefer similar others , 2012, Cognition.

[15]  Susan K. Walker.  Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives , 2011 .

[16]  J. Bosson,et al.  I Feel Like I Know You: Sharing Negative Attitudes of Others Promotes Feelings of Familiarity , 2011, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[17]  Lori Markson,et al.  Similarity predicts liking in 3-year-old children. , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[18]  Christine Fawcett,et al.  Children reason about shared preferences. , 2010, Developmental psychology.

[19]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Predicting tie strength with social media , 2009, CHI.

[20]  R. Horton,et al.  Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity , 2008 .

[21]  Omar Lizardo,et al.  How Cultural Tastes Shape Personal Networks , 2006 .

[22]  Jennifer K. Bosson,et al.  Interpersonal chemistry through negativity: Bonding by sharing negative attitudes about others , 2006 .

[23]  R. Fabes,et al.  Exposure to Externalizing Peers in Early Childhood: Homophily and Peer Contagion Processes , 2005, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[24]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[25]  J. Hamm,et al.  Do birds of a feather flock together? The variable bases for African American, Asian American, and European American adolescents' selection of similar friends. , 2000, Developmental psychology.

[26]  W. Hartup,et al.  Similarities between Friends and Nonfriends in Middle Childhood , 1998 .

[27]  Ramadhar Singh,et al.  Attitudes and Attraction: A Developmental Study of the Similarity-Attraction and Dissimilarity-Repulsion Hypotheses , 1995 .

[28]  J. Kupersmidt,et al.  Similarity as the Basis for Children's Friendships: The Roles of Sociometric Status, Aggressive and Withdrawn Behavior, Academic Achievement and Demographic Characteristics , 1995 .

[29]  E. Woody,et al.  Friends Versus Nonfriends: Perceptions of Similarity across Self, Teachers, and Peers. , 1991 .

[30]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Interpersonal similarity and the social and intellectual dimensions of first impressions , 1988 .

[31]  D. Kandel.  Homophily, Selection, and Socialization in Adolescent Friendships , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  Denise B. Kandel,et al.  Similarity in Real-Life Adolescent Friendship Pairs. , 1978 .

[33]  L. Verbrugge.  The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices , 1977 .

[34]  Jere M. Cohen.  Sources of peer group homogeneity. , 1977 .

[35]  A. Lott,et al.  Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  D. Byrne,et al.  Racial prejudice, interpersonal attraction, and assumed dissimilarity of attitudes. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[37]  J. Marks.  Interests and Group Formation , 1959 .

[38]  Theodore M. Newcomb,et al.  The prediction of interpersonal attraction , 1956 .

[39]  Ayelet Fishbach,et al.  A recipe for friendship: Similar food consumption promotes trust and cooperation , 2017 .

[40]  V. Talwar,et al.  From little white lies to filthy liars: the evolution of honesty and deception in young children. , 2011, Advances in child development and behavior.

[41]  S. Barbu,et al.  Similarity of Behavioral Profiles Among Friends in Early Childhood , 2009 .

[42]  P. Rozin,et al.  Food likes and dislikes. , 1986, Annual review of nutrition.

[43]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis , 1964 .