Complexity and modularity of intracellular networks: a systematic approach for modelling and simulation.

Assembly of quantitative models of large complex networks brings about several challenges. One of them is the combinatorial complexity, where relatively few signalling molecules can combine to form thousands or millions of distinct chemical species. A receptor that has several separate phosphorylation sites can exist in hundreds of different states, many of which must be accounted for individually when simulating the time course of signalling. When assembly of protein complexes is being included, the number of distinct molecular species can easily increase by a few orders of magnitude. Validation, visualisation and understanding the network can become intractable. Another challenge appears when the modeller needs to recast or grow a model. Keeping track of changes and adding new elements present a significant difficulty. An approach to solve these challenges within the virtual cell (VCell) is described. Using (i) automatic extraction from pathway databases of model components (http://vcell.org/biopax) and (ii) rules of interactions that serve as reaction network generators (http://vcell.org/bionetgen), a way is provided for semi-automatic generation of quantitative mathematical models that also facilitates the reuse of model elements. In this approach, kinetic models of large, complex networks can be assembled from separately constructed modules, either directly or via rules. To implement this approach, the strength of several related technologies is combined: the BioPAX ontology, the BioNetGen rule-based description of molecular interactions and the VCell modelling and simulation framework.

[1]  S. Godsill,et al.  The Institution of Engineering and Technology Seminar on Target Tracking and Data Fusion , 2008 .

[2]  William S. Hlavacek,et al.  BioNetGen: software for rule-based modeling of signal transduction based on the interactions of molecular domains , 2004, Bioinform..

[3]  Michael L. Blinov,et al.  XML Encoding of Features Describing Rule-Based Modeling of Reaction Networks with Multi-Component Molecular Complexes , 2007, 2007 IEEE 7th International Symposium on BioInformatics and BioEngineering.

[4]  Michael L. Blinov,et al.  Kinetic Modeling Using BioPAX Ontology , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM 2007).

[5]  W. S. Hlavacek,et al.  A network model of early events in epidermal growth factor receptor signaling that accounts for combinatorial complexity. , 2006, Bio Systems.

[6]  Arup K Chakraborty,et al.  CD4 enhances T cell sensitivity to antigen by coordinating Lck accumulation at the immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[7]  E. Gilles,et al.  Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Quantification of Short Term Signaling by the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  P. Shannon,et al.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. , 2003, Genome research.

[10]  William S. Hlavacek,et al.  Rule-based modeling of biochemical networks , 2005, Complex..

[11]  Nicolas Le Novère,et al.  MIRIAM Resources: tools to generate and resolve robust cross-references in Systems Biology , 2007, BMC Systems Biology.

[12]  James R Faeder,et al.  Investigation of early events in Fc epsilon RI-mediated signaling using a detailed mathematical model. , 2003, Journal of immunology.

[13]  Roger Brent,et al.  Automatic generation of cellular reaction networks with Moleculizer 1.0 , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  James C. Schaff,et al.  Think Simulation - Think Experiment: The Virtual Cell Paradigm , 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference.

[15]  Dipak Barua,et al.  Structure-based kinetic models of modular signaling protein function: focus on Shp2. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Joanne S. Luciano,et al.  PAX of mind for pathway researchers. , 2005, Drug discovery today.

[17]  T. Pawson,et al.  Assembly of Cell Regulatory Systems Through Protein Interaction Domains , 2003, Science.

[18]  W. Lim,et al.  Domains, motifs, and scaffolds: the role of modular interactions in the evolution and wiring of cell signaling circuits. , 2006, Annual review of biochemistry.

[19]  W. S. Hlavacek,et al.  Investigation of Early Events in FcεRI-Mediated Signaling Using a Detailed Mathematical Model1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[20]  Leslie M Loew,et al.  Intracellular signaling: spatial and temporal control. , 2005, Physiology.

[21]  Gabriel A. Wainer,et al.  Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference , 2016 .

[22]  Jacky L. Snoep,et al.  BioModels Database: a free, centralized database of curated, published, quantitative kinetic models of biochemical and cellular systems , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  Michael Hucka,et al.  A Correction to the Review Titled "Rules for Modeling Signal-Transduction Systems" by W. S. Hlavacek et al. , 2006, Science's STKE.

[24]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Modularity in Metabolic Networks , 2002, Science.

[25]  L. Loew,et al.  The Virtual Cell: a software environment for computational cell biology. , 2001, Trends in biotechnology.

[26]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models , 2003, Bioinform..

[27]  C. Ouzounis,et al.  Expansion of the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases to 160 genomes , 2005, Nucleic acids research.