Evolutionary trend of exceptionally long human core promoter short tandem repeats.

Short tandem repeats (STRs) are variable elements that play a significant role in genome evolution by creating and maintaining quantitative genetic variation. Because of their proximity to the +1 transcription start site (TSS) and polymorphic nature, core promoter STRs may be considered a novel source of variation across species. In a genome-scale analysis of the entire human protein-coding genes annotated in the GeneCards database (19,927), we analyze the prevalence and repeat numbers of different classes of core promoter STRs in the interval between -120 and +1 to the TSS. We also analyze the evolutionary trend of exceptionally long core promoter STRs of ≥6-repeats. 133 genes (~2%) had core promoter STRs of ≥6-repeats. In the majority of those genes, the STR motifs were found to be conserved across evolution. Di-nucleotide repeats had the highest representation in the human core promoter long STRs (72 genes). Tri- (52 genes), tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotide STRs (9 genes) were also present in the descending prevalence. The majority of those genes (84 genes) revealed directional expansion of core promoter STRs from mouse to human. However, in a number of genes, the difference in average allele size across species was sufficiently small that there might be a constraint on the evolution of average allele size. Random drift of STRs from mouse to human was also observed in a minority of genes. Future work on the genes listed in the current study may further our knowledge into the potential importance of core promoter STRs in human evolution.

[1]  S. Kong,et al.  AF1q enhancement of γ irradiation-induced apoptosis by up-regulation of BAD expression via NF-κB in human squamous carcinoma A431 cells , 2010 .

[2]  Y. Itzhak,et al.  Long-term memory of visually cued fear conditioning: roles of the neuronal nitric oxide synthase gene and cyclic AMP response element-binding protein , 2011, Neuroscience.

[3]  Fran Lewitter,et al.  Intragenic tandem repeats generate functional variability , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[4]  C. Ross,et al.  Microsatellite evolution — evidence for directionality and variation in rate between species , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[5]  L. Jin,et al.  Conservation of human chromosome 13 polymorphic microsatellite (CA)n repeats in chimpanzees. , 1994, Genomics.

[6]  Matthieu Legendre,et al.  Unstable Tandem Repeats in Promoters Confer Transcriptional Evolvability , 2009, Science.

[7]  Larry J Young,et al.  Microsatellite Instability Generates Diversity in Brain and Sociobehavioral Traits , 2005, Science.

[8]  K. Vella,et al.  Nhlh2 is a Cold-Responsive Gene , 2010 .

[9]  W. Schaffner,et al.  Pathological, physiological, and evolutionary aspects of short unstable DNA repeats in the human genome. , 1995, Biological chemistry Hoppe-Seyler.

[10]  J. Mullikin,et al.  Microsatellites are molecular clocks that support accurate inferences about history. , 2009, Molecular biology and evolution.

[11]  S. Hosseinkhani,et al.  Core promoter STRs: novel mechanism for inter-individual variation in gene expression in humans. , 2012, Gene.

[12]  J. McDearmid,et al.  Nitric Oxide Synthase Regulates Morphogenesis of Zebrafish Spinal Cord Motoneurons , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  H. Ellegren.  Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[14]  E. Nevo,et al.  Microsatellites: genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[15]  H. Najmabadi,et al.  Exceptional human core promoter nucleotide compositions. , 2011, Gene.

[16]  W. Amos,et al.  Quantifying ascertainment bias and species-specific length differences in human and chimpanzee microsatellites using genome sequences. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[17]  J. Kasahara,et al.  Role of inducible or neuronal nitric oxide synthase in neurogenesis of the dentate gyrus in aged mice , 2010, Metabolic Brain Disease.

[18]  S. Bergmann,et al.  The evolution of gene expression levels in mammalian organs , 2011, Nature.

[19]  D. Rubinsztein,et al.  Ascertainment bias cannot entirely account for human microsatellites being longer than their chimpanzee homologues. , 1998, Human molecular genetics.

[20]  G. Chambers,et al.  Microsatellites: consensus and controversy. , 2000, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology.

[21]  T. V. Nikitina,et al.  Human Microsatellites: Mutation and Evolution , 2004, Russian Journal of Genetics.

[22]  G. Wray,et al.  Abundant raw material for cis-regulatory evolution in humans. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[23]  H. Ellegren,et al.  Microsatellite evolution inferred from human– chimpanzee genomic sequence alignments , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  K. M. Shaffer,et al.  AF1q, a differentially expressed gene during neuronal differentiation, transforms HEK cells into neuron-like cells. , 2004, Brain research. Molecular brain research.

[25]  U. Wankhade,et al.  Deletion of Nhlh2 Results in a Defective Torpor Response and Reduced Beta Adrenergic Receptor Expression in Adipose Tissue , 2010, PloS one.

[26]  H. Garner,et al.  Molecular origins of rapid and continuous morphological evolution , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Y. Kashi,et al.  Simple sequence repeats as advantageous mutators in evolution. , 2006, Trends in genetics : TIG.