Effective Harmonic Potentials: Insights into the Internal Cooperativity and Sequence-Specificity of Protein Dynamics

The proper biological functioning of proteins often relies on the occurrence of coordinated fluctuations around their native structure, or on their ability to perform wider and sometimes highly elaborated motions. Hence, there is considerable interest in the definition of accurate coarse-grained descriptions of protein dynamics, as an alternative to more computationally expensive approaches. In particular, the elastic network model, in which residue motions are subjected to pairwise harmonic potentials, is known to capture essential aspects of conformational dynamics in proteins, but has so far remained mostly phenomenological, and unable to account for the chemical specificities of amino acids. We propose, for the first time, a method to derive residue- and distance-specific effective harmonic potentials from the statistical analysis of an extensive dataset of NMR conformational ensembles. These potentials constitute dynamical counterparts to the mean-force statistical potentials commonly used for static analyses of protein structures. In the context of the elastic network model, they yield a strongly improved description of the cooperative aspects of residue motions, and give the opportunity to systematically explore the influence of sequence details on protein dynamics.

[1]  M. Oda,et al.  Protein Dynamics and the Diversity of an Antibody Response* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  J A McCammon,et al.  Computing the Amino Acid Specificity of Fluctuations in Biomolecular Systems. , 2006, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[3]  C. Brooks,et al.  Symmetry, form, and shape: guiding principles for robustness in macromolecular machines. , 2006, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[4]  Tod D Romo,et al.  Elastic Network Models are Robust to Variations in Formalism. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[5]  I. Bahar,et al.  Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function. , 2010, Annual review of biophysics.

[6]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Shoji Takada,et al.  Coarse-grained molecular simulations of large biomolecules. , 2012, Current opinion in structural biology.

[8]  K. Hinsen,et al.  Harmonicity in slow protein dynamics , 2000 .

[9]  M. Karplus,et al.  Anisotropy and anharmonicity of atomic fluctuations in proteins: implications for X-ray analysis. , 1988, Biochemistry.

[10]  George N Phillips,et al.  Evaluating elastic network models of crystalline biological molecules with temperature factors, correlated motions, and diffuse x-ray scattering. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Ali Rana Atilgan,et al.  Network-based models as tools hinting at nonevident protein functionality. , 2012, Annual review of biophysics.

[12]  Sophie Sacquin-Mora,et al.  Modeling the mechanical response of proteins to anisotropic deformation. , 2009, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[13]  Qiang Cui,et al.  Interpreting correlated motions using normal mode analysis. , 2006, Structure.

[14]  O. Keskin,et al.  Identification of specificity and promiscuity of PDZ domain interactions through their dynamic behavior , 2009, Proteins.

[15]  M. Karplus,et al.  Anisotropy and anharmonicity of atomic fluctuations in proteins: Analysis of a molecular dynamics simulation , 1987, Proteins.

[16]  M. Gerstein,et al.  A database of macromolecular motions. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  Cinque S. Soto,et al.  Conformational dynamics in loop swap mutants of homologous fibronectin type III domains. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[18]  K. Hamacher,et al.  Relating sequence evolution of HIV1-protease to its underlying molecular mechanics. , 2008, Gene.

[19]  Eric C. Dykeman,et al.  Normal mode analysis and applications in biological physics , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[20]  Hendrik Dietz,et al.  Anisotropic deformation response of single protein molecules , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  D Gilis,et al.  A new generation of statistical potentials for proteins. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[22]  I. Bahar,et al.  Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[23]  Holger Flechsig,et al.  Tracing entire operation cycles of molecular motor hepatitis C virus helicase in structurally resolved dynamical simulations , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  M J Sippl,et al.  Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. , 1995, Current opinion in structural biology.

[25]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Network of dynamically important residues in the open/closed transition in polymerases is strongly conserved. , 2005, Structure.

[26]  A. Mikhailov,et al.  Myosin-V as a mechanical sensor: an elastic network study. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[27]  M. DePristo,et al.  Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[28]  Nathalie Reuter,et al.  Measuring and comparing structural fluctuation patterns in large protein datasets , 2012, Bioinform..

[29]  M. Rooman,et al.  Sequence-structure signals of 3D domain swapping in proteins. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  Tirion,et al.  Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[32]  H. Hadi,et al.  ANALYSIS OF A MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION OF THE ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE ENZYME AND ITS COMPLEX WITH (AXILLARIDINE-A) INHIBITOR , 2008 .

[33]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  Donald J Jacobs,et al.  Switch II mutants reveal coupling between the nucleotide- and actin-binding regions in myosin V. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[35]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  Coarse-grained biomolecular simulation with REACH: realistic extension algorithm via covariance Hessian. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[36]  I. Bahar,et al.  Normal mode analysis of biomolecular structures: functional mechanisms of membrane proteins. , 2010, Chemical reviews.

[37]  R. Glockshuber,et al.  NMR solution structure of the periplasmic chaperone FimC , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[38]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Using Entropy Maximization to Understand the Determinants of Structural Dynamics beyond Native Contact Topology , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  Guillaume Lamour,et al.  The molecular mechanism underlying mechanical anisotropy of the protein GB1. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[40]  Guang Song,et al.  Protein elastic network models and the ranges of cooperativity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Canan Atilgan,et al.  How orientational order governs collectivity of folded proteins , 2010, Proteins.