Effects of polyglecaprone 25, silk and catgut suture materials on oral mucosa wound healing in diabetic rats: an evaluation of nitric oxide dynamics.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of monocryl (Polyglecaprone 25), silk and catgut suture materials on wound healing in diabetic rats and to evaluate NO (nitric oxide) dynamics. STUDY DESIGN Fourty-eight male Wistar-Albino rats weighing 220-270 g were used in this study. The rats were categorized into 2 groups, as control group (n=24) and streptozotocin (STZ) induced diabetic group (n=24). For each group, incision wounds were created on the inner cheek mucosa of the animals and wounds were closed primarily with three different types of sutures. These materials were sized 3-0 monocryl (polyglecaprone 25), silk and catgut sutures swaged on. Excisional biopsies were performed at 2nd, 7th, 14th and 21st day (2 rats per day) from the initial surgical procedure. Effects of these suture materials on wound healing and NOS (nitric oxide synthase) activities were compared immunohistochemically in the study. eNOS and iNOS (Endothelial and induced nitric oxide synthase) activities were classified as mild (+), moderate (++) and severe (+++). RESULTS Mild eNOS activities were seen in both diabetic and control groups at 2nd day specimens. Activities of silk and catgut were similar both in diabetic and control groups at 14th day, this activity in monocryl was mild. 21st day specimens revealed that monocryl has mild eNOS activity than silk and catgut sutures. iNOS activities in diabetic group were greater than control groups and the degrees of the activity in monocryl, silk and catgut sutures were mild, severe and moderate at the 7th day. At the 14th day there was no iNOS activity in diabetic monocryl group. CONCLUSION All of the materials have the potential capacity to be well tolerated however monocryl seemed to have more beneficial effects on wound healing in diabetic subjects.

[1]  M. Ferguson,et al.  The role of nitric oxide synthase isoforms and arginase in the pathogenesis of diabetic foot ulcers: possible modulatory effects by transforming growth factor beta 1 , 1999, Diabetologia.

[2]  R. Ward,et al.  Effects of Scalpel, Electrocautery, and CO2 and KTP Lasers on Wound Healing in Rat Tongues , 1998, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  Timothy R Billiar,et al.  Impaired wound healing and angiogenesis in eNOS-deficient mice. , 1999, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[4]  R. Postlethwait Long‐Term Comparative Study of Nonabsorbable Sutures , 1970, Annals of surgery.

[5]  A. Singer,et al.  Cutaneous wound healing. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  G. Lilly,et al.  Reaction of oral tissues to suture materials. IV. , 1968, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[7]  C. Masini,et al.  Suture Materials and Other Factors Associated with Tissue Reactivity, Infection, and Wound Dehiscence among Plastic Surgery Outpatients , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  B. Romana-Souza,et al.  Propranolol improves cutaneous wound healing in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. , 2009, European journal of pharmacology.

[9]  R. Nelson,et al.  Wound healing and repair: a review of the art and science. , 1998, General dentistry.

[10]  U. Sinha,et al.  Effects of Steel Scalpel, Ultrasonic Scalpel, CO2 Laser, and Monopolar and Bipolar Electrosurgery on Wound Healing in Guinea Pig Oral Mucosa , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[11]  Y. Vodovotz,et al.  Nitric oxide and wound repair: role of cytokines? , 2002, Nitric oxide : biology and chemistry.

[12]  Jian-dongLUO,et al.  Nitric oxide: a newly discovered function on wound healing , 2005 .

[13]  U. Tantry,et al.  Nitric oxide regulates wound healing. , 1996, The Journal of surgical research.

[14]  A. Consolaro,et al.  Comparative study of tissue response to polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene suture materials in rats. , 2002, Brazilian dental journal.

[15]  J. McMurry,et al.  Wound healing with diabetes mellitus. Better glucose control for better wound healing in diabetes. , 1984, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[16]  D. Steed,et al.  Reversal of impaired wound repair in iNOS-deficient mice by topical adenoviral-mediated iNOS gene transfer. , 1998, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[17]  James Leiper,et al.  Blocking NO synthesis: how, where and why? , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[18]  P. Efron,et al.  Diabetes-impaired healing and reduced wound nitric oxide synthesis: a possible pathophysiologic correlation. , 1997, Surgery.

[19]  Y. Bello,et al.  Recent advances in wound healing. , 2000, JAMA.