A Developmentally Based Theory and Technology of Instruction

Two of the most widely documented principles that have emerged from the study of intellectual development are (a) that young children approach intellectual tasks with strategies that are reasonable but oversimplified and (b) that young children are incapable of dealing with more than a few items of information at one time. Table 1 presents a description of the strategies that young children use to solve three different Piagetian tasks. Consider first the task where the child is presented with two beakers of water, and asked to judge which contains the greater amount to drink (Piaget, 1957). The 5-year old strategy on this task may be characterized as follows: "Estimate the height of the first beaker. Estimate the height of the second beaker. Choose the beaker with the taller column of liquid." This is, of course, a very reasonable strategy and one that would probably work most of the time at home or at school, where drinking water would be offered in glasses of equal diameter. Consider next a task called the Orange Juice Problem (Noelting, Note 1). On this task, children are presented with two small sets of cups, some of which are filled with water, and some of which are filled with orange concentrate. They are asked which set will form a mixture that tastes more strongly of orange juice. The 5-year old strategy on this task may be characterized as follows. "Count the number of orange-concentrate cups in the first set. Count the number of orange-concentrate cups in the second set. Choose

[1]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[2]  J. Deutsch Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[3]  G. H. McLaughlin PSYCHO‐LOGIC: A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE TO PIAGET'S FORMULATION , 1963 .

[4]  H. Bellin Learning and operational convergence in logical thought development , 1965 .

[5]  E. Sullivan ACQUISITION OF CONSERVATION OF SUBSTANCE THROUGH FILM MODELING TECHNIQUES. , 1967 .

[6]  M I Posner,et al.  Short term memory systems in human information processing. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[7]  R. Gelman Conservation acquisition: A problem of learning to attend to relevant attributes☆ , 1969 .

[8]  H. Ginsburg,et al.  Piaget's theory of intellectual development , 1969 .

[9]  J. Piaget,et al.  The early growth of logic in the child : classification and seriation , 1965 .

[10]  Robert M. Gagné,et al.  The conditions of learning, 2nd ed. , 1970 .

[11]  OPERATIONAL THOUGHT INDUCEMENT , 1970 .

[12]  Juan Pascual-Leone,et al.  A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages , 1970 .

[13]  G. Halford A theory of the acquisition of conservation. , 1970, Psychological review.

[14]  Donald Ross Green,et al.  Measurement and Piaget , 1971 .

[15]  R. Case Validation of a Neo-Piagetian Mental Capacity Construct. , 1972 .

[16]  A. Pinard,et al.  Apprentissage de la conservation des quantités par une méthode de conflit cognitif. , 1972 .

[17]  R. Case Learning and development: a neo-Piagetian interpretation. , 1972, Human development.

[18]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROCESSOR , 1972 .

[19]  P. H. Lindsay,et al.  Human Information Processing: An Introduction to Psychology , 1972 .

[20]  J. P. Cavanagh Relation between the immediate memory span and the memory search rate. , 1972 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[22]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[23]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Educational psychology;: The science of instruction and learning , 1973 .

[24]  Tamar Globerson,et al.  Field Independence and Central Computing Space , 1974 .

[25]  R. Case Mental Strategies, Mental Capacity, and Instruction: A Neo-Piagetian Investigation. , 1974 .

[26]  Ted L. Rosenthal,et al.  Observational learning of rule-governed behavior by children. , 1974 .

[27]  An Analysis of Synchrony between Concrete-operational Tasks in Terms of Structural and Performance Demands. , 1974 .

[28]  R. Case Structures and strictures: Some functional limitations on the course of cognitive growth. , 1974 .

[29]  Bärbel Inhelder,et al.  Learning and the Development of Cognition , 1974 .

[30]  R. Case Gearing the Demands of Instruction to the Developmental Capacities of the Learner , 1975 .

[31]  R. Siegler Three aspects of cognitive development , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  Bruce L. Bachelder,et al.  A Theory of Intelligence: I. Span and the Complexity of Stimulus Control. , 1977 .

[33]  Bruce L. Bachelder,et al.  A theory of intelligence: II. The role of span in a variety of intellectual tasks , 1977 .

[34]  R. Case Responsiveness to conservation training as a function of induced subjective uncertainty, M-space, and cognitive style. , 1977 .

[35]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Seeing, hearing, and doing: a developmental study of memory for actions. , 1977, Child development.

[36]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Information Processing Capacity and the Problem of Horizontal Decalage: A Demonstration Using Combinatorial Reasoning Tasks. , 1977 .

[37]  R. Case Intellectual development from birth to adulthood: A neo-Piagetian interpretation. , 1978 .

[38]  Mary Carol Day,et al.  Levels of Availability of a Formal Operational Strategy. , 1978 .

[39]  M. Chi Knowledge structures and memory development. , 1978 .

[40]  Allan Collins Explicating the Tacit Knowledge in Teaching and Learning. Technical Report No. 5. , 1978 .

[41]  A new processing model for predicting performance on Pascual-Leone's test of M-space , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.