Almost all languages have some grammatical means for the linguistic categorization of nouns and nominals. The continuum of noun categorization devices covers a range of devices, from the lexical numeral classifiers of Southeast Asia to the highly grammaticalized gender agreement classes of Indo-European languages. They have a similar semantic basis, and one can develop from the other. They provide a unique insight into how people categorize the world through their language in terms of universal semantic parameters involving humanness, animacy, sex, shape, form, consistency, and functional properties.
Noun categorization devices are morphemes that occur in surface structures under specifiable conditions, and denote some salient perceived or imputed characteristics of the entity to which an associated noun refers (Allan, 1977: 285). They are restricted to classifier constructions, morphosyntactic units (e.g., noun phrases of different kinds, verb phrases, or clauses) that require the presence of a particular kind of morpheme, the choice of which is dictated by the semantic characteristics of the referent of the nominal head of a noun phrase.
Noun categorization devices come in various guises. We distinguish noun classes, noun classifiers, numeral classifiers, classifiers in possessive constructions, and verbal classifiers. Two relatively rare types are locative and deictic classifiers. They share a common semantic core and differ in the morphosyntactic contexts of their use and in their preferred semantic features.
Research Background:
This article is a concise and encyclopaedic summary of grammatical means for the linguistic categorization of nouns and nominals based on original work by Aikhenvald. The continuum of noun categorization devices covers a range of devices, from the lexical numeral classifiers of Southeast Asia to the highly grammaticalized gender agreement classes of Indo-European languages. They provide a unique insight into how people categorize the world through their language in terms of universal semantic parameters involving humanness, animacy, sex, shape, form, consistency, and functional properties.
Research Contribution:
The main contribution of this article is the formulation of parameters of variation and semantics of noun categorization devices across several hundred of the world's languages. The article provides original insights into human categorization of nominal entities and culturally relevant parameters of categorization, which may also be influenced by social and physical environment.
Research Significance:
This article is part of the fundamental Encyclopaedia of Languages and Linguistics which is a major reference source in the area of linguistics, languages and cognitive and behavioural studies. Noun categorization devices come in various guises. We distinguish noun classes, noun classifiers, numeral classifiers, classifiers in possessive constructions, and verbal classifiers. Two relatively rare types are locative and deictic classifiers. They share a common semantic core and differ in the morphosyntactic contexts of their use and in their preferred semantic features. This article breaks new grounds in offering a comprehensive empirically based approach to human categorization of entities, and correlations between language and culture. It is widely quoted and considered a major reference for the typology of categorization devices.
[1]
WALTER BISANG.
Classification and the evolution of grammatical structures: a universal perspective
,
2002
.
[2]
John P. Hutchison,et al.
Current approaches to African linguistics
,
1983
.
[3]
安可思.
Towards a Unified Account of Classifier Production in Normals and Aphasics
,
1993
.
[4]
YO MATSUMOTO.
Japanese numeral classifiers: a study of semantic categories and lexical organization
,
1993
.
[5]
Robert Dixon,et al.
The Dyirbal language of North Queensland
,
1972
.
[6]
David A. Zubin,et al.
Gender and Folk Taxonomy: The Indexical Relation Between Grammatical and Lexical Categorization
,
1986
.
[7]
Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald,et al.
Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices
,
2000
.
[8]
Scott Rushforth,et al.
Uses of Bearlake and Mescalero (Athapaskan) Classificatory Verbs
,
1991,
International Journal of American Linguistics.
[9]
J. P. Denny,et al.
What are Noun Classifiers Good for
,
1976
.
[10]
ALTON L. BECKER.
A LINGUISTIC IMAGE OF NATURE: THE BURMESE NUMERATIVE CLASSIFIER SYSTEM
,
1975
.
[11]
Michael Walsh.
Noun Classes, Nominal Classification and Generics in Murrinhpatha
,
1997
.
[12]
Karen Lee Adams.
Systems of numeral classification in the Mon-Khmer, Nicobarese and Asian subfamilies of Austroasiatic
,
1989
.
[13]
Christopher I. Beckwith,et al.
Noun specification and classification in Uzbek
,
1998
.
[14]
Colette G. Craig.
Jacaltec Noun Classifiers: A Study in Language and Culture
,
1986
.