The influence of limb crossing on left tactile extinction.

BACKGROUND Previous research on patients with left tactile extinction has shown that crossing of hands, so that each hand is on the opposite side of the body midline relative to the other, improves detection of stimuli given to the left hand. OBJECTIVES To study the influence of the spatial position of limbs on left tactile extinction, and its relations with left visual neglect. METHODS Normal participants and patients with right cerebral hemisphere damage and left tactile extinction were asked to detect single or double light touch stimuli applied to their cheeks, hands, or knees with their arm and legs either in anatomical or in crossed position, increasing the attentional load of the task. RESULTS In patients with left extinction, limb crossing caused a deterioration in performance for stimuli applied to right body parts, with only a tendency to an improvement in detection for left body parts (only two of 24 patients showed substantial (>20%) improvement in left extinction after limb crossing). After crossing, left limb detections of double stimuli decreased with increasing degrees of visual neglect. CONCLUSIONS In conditions of high attentional load, limb crossing may impair tactile detection in most patients with left extinction, and particularly in those showing signs of left visual neglect. These results underline the importance of general attentional capacity in determining tactile extinction. Attentional and somatotopic mechanisms of extinction may assume different weights in different patients.

[1]  J. Binder,et al.  Distinct syndromes of hemineglect. , 1992, Archives of neurology.

[2]  G. Kerkhoff,et al.  Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation alleviates tactile extinction , 2000, Neuroreport.

[3]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Coding of Spatial Information in the Somatosensory System: Evidence from Patients with Neglect following Parietal Lobe Damage , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Elisabetta Làdavas,et al.  Seeing where your hands are , 1997, Nature.

[5]  I. Hashimoto.  Trigeminal evoked potentials following brief air puff: Enhanced signal‐to‐noise ratio , 1988, Annals of neurology.

[6]  S. Aglioti,et al.  Sensory and spatial components of somaesthetic deficits following right brain damage , 1995, Neurology.

[7]  Sylvie Chokron,et al.  The Role of Vision in Spatial Representation , 2004, Cortex.

[8]  Giuseppe di Pellegrino,et al.  Neuropsychological Evidence of an Integrated Visuotactile Representation of Peripersonal Space in Humans , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  G Vallar,et al.  Anatomical correlates of visual and tactile extinction in humans: a clinical CT scan study. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[10]  P Bartolomeo,et al.  The relationship between visuospatial and representational neglect , 1994, Neurology.

[11]  John C. Marshall,et al.  Left Visuo-Spatial Neglect: A Meaningless Entity? , 1992, Cortex.

[12]  M. B. Bender,et al.  Disorders in perception : with particular reference to the phenomena of extinction and displacement , 1952 .

[13]  John C. Marshall,et al.  When seeing is feeling: Acquired synaesthesia or phantom touch? , 1996 .

[14]  E. Renzi,et al.  Auditory extinction following hemisphere damage , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  R. Adams,et al.  Principles of Neurology , 1996 .

[16]  M. Critchley.  The parietal lobes , 1966 .

[17]  D. Perani,et al.  Unilateral neglect: Personal and extra-personal , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  P. Bartolomeo,et al.  Visual, proprioceptive and tactile performance in left neglect patients , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  M D'Esposito,et al.  Assessment of neglect reveals dissociable behavioral but not neuroanatomical subtypes , 1996, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[20]  M. Mesulam.  Attentional networks, confusional states, and neglect syndromes. , 2000 .

[21]  C. Kennard,et al.  Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients , 1997, Nature.

[22]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Space and attention in parietal cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  Gregory P. Lee,et al.  Cerebral lateralization , 1999, Neurology.

[24]  G. Harwood.  Principles of Neurology. 3rd ed , 1986 .

[25]  S. Ferber,et al.  How to Assess Spatial Neglect - Line Bisection or Cancellation Tasks? , 2001, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[26]  J. Cambier,et al.  [Effect of the state of activation of the cerebral hemisphere on sensory extinction. A study in 10 patients with right hemisphere lesions (author's transl)]. , 1981, Revue neurologique.

[27]  M. Mesulam.  Principles of behavioral neurology , 1985 .

[28]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Phasic alerting of neglect patients overcomes their spatial deficit in visual awareness , 1998, Nature.

[29]  M. Albert.  A simple test of visual neglect , 1973, Neurology.

[30]  John C. Marshall,et al.  Somatosensory assessment: can seeing produce feeling? , 1997, Journal of Neurology.

[31]  Ian Robertson,et al.  Early rightwards orienting of attention on simple reaction time performance in patients with left-sided neglect , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  C. Caltagirone,et al.  Pattern of ipsilateral clinical extinction in brain-damaged patients. , 1975, Applied neurophysiology.

[33]  Nicola Smania,et al.  Frames of Reference for Mapping Tactile Stimuli in Brain-Damaged Patients , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  W. Penfield,et al.  SOMATIC MOTOR AND SENSORY REPRESENTATION IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF MAN AS STUDIED BY ELECTRICAL STIMULATION , 1937 .

[35]  Stephen McAdams,et al.  The neuroanatomical substrate of sound duration discrimination , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  E. De Renzi,et al.  An experimental investigation on the nature of extinction. , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  B BenderMorris,et al.  DISORDERS IN PERCEPTION , 1954 .

[38]  G Gainotti,et al.  Mechanisms of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions. , 1986, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[39]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Do We Need the “Lateral” in Unilateral Neglect? Spatially Nonselective Attention Deficits in Unilateral Neglect and Their Implications for Rehabilitation , 2001, NeuroImage.

[40]  E. Renzi,et al.  An experimental investigation on the nature of extinction , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  K. Meador,et al.  Right cerebral specialization for tactile attention as evidenced by intracarotid sodium amytal , 1988, Neurology.

[42]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  Binding Personal and Peripersonal Space: Evidence from Tactile Extinction , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  P Bartolomeo,et al.  Early orientation of attention toward the half space ipsilateral to the lesion in patients with unilateral brain damage. , 1991, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[44]  Sylvie Chokron,et al.  Egocentric frame of reference: its role in spatial biasafter right hemisphere lesions , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  Jon Driver,et al.  Attentional competition between modalities: extinction between touch and vision after right hemisphere damage , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  B. Eskenazi,et al.  The nature of unilateral neglect in the olfactory sensory system , 1988, Neuropsychologia.