Priming of actions increases sense of control over unexpected outcomes

Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our own actions and, through them, events in the outside world. SoA depends partly on retrospectively matching outcomes to expectations, and partly on prospective processes occurring prior to action, notably action selection. To assess the relative contribution of these processes, we factorially varied subliminal priming of action selection and expectation of action outcomes. Both factors affected SoA, and there was also a significant interaction. Compatible action primes increased SoA more strongly for unexpected than expected outcomes. Outcome expectation had strong effects on SoA following incompatible action priming, but only weak effects following compatible action priming. Prospective and retrospective SoA may have distinct and complementary functions.

[1]  P. Haggard,et al.  Sense of agency , 2012, Current Biology.

[2]  A. Newen,et al.  Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[3]  D. Wegner,et al.  Modulating the sense of agency with external cues , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[4]  C. Frith,et al.  Experiencing Oneself vs Another Person as Being the Cause of an Action: The Neural Correlates of the Experience of Agency , 2002, NeuroImage.

[5]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Metacognition of agency. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  Daniel M Wegner,et al.  Précis of The illusion of conscious will , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  W. Prinz,et al.  An online neural substrate for sense of agency. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  D. Wegner,et al.  Apparent mental causation. Sources of the experience of will. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[9]  Manos Tsakiris,et al.  The Experience of Agency , 2009 .

[10]  H. Gomi,et al.  Action Evaluation Is Modulated Dominantly by Internal Sensorimotor Information and Partly by Noncausal External Cue , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  M. Eimer,et al.  Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[12]  P. Haggard,et al.  Altered awareness of action in schizophrenia: a specific deficit in predicting action consequences. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.

[14]  P. Fossati,et al.  Different brain structures related to self- and external-agency attribution: a brief review and meta-analysis , 2011, Brain Structure and Function.

[15]  M. Gazzaniga.  The cognitive neurosciences, 3rd edition , 2004 .

[16]  S. Spence,et al.  The actor's brain: Exploring the cognitive neuroscience of free will , 2009 .

[17]  Dearborn.  Animal Intelligence: An Experimental Study of the Associative Processes in Animals , 1900 .

[18]  Shaun Gallagher,et al.  Multiple aspects in the sense of agency , 2012 .

[19]  D. Wegner,et al.  Apparent mental causation , 1999 .

[20]  P. Haggard,et al.  Subliminal priming of actions influences sense of control over effects of action , 2010, Cognition.

[21]  David Lagnado,et al.  Feelings of control: Contingency determines experience of action , 2009, Cognition.

[22]  Atsushi Sato,et al.  Both motor prediction and conceptual congruency between preview and action-effect contribute to explicit judgment of agency , 2009, Cognition.

[23]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Abnormalities in the awareness of action , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  P. Haggard,et al.  Awareness of action: Inference and prediction , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[25]  David J. Turk,et al.  The angular gyrus computes action awareness representations. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  M. Eimer,et al.  Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  P. Fletcher,et al.  Sense of agency in health and disease: A review of cue integration approaches☆ , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[28]  L. Abramson,et al.  Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser? , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  J. Schwarzbach,et al.  Different time courses for visual perception and action priming , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[31]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Merging the senses into a robust percept , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  Karl J. Friston.  The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain? , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  Marc Jeannerod,et al.  Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[34]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Sense of control depends on fluency of action selection, not motor performance , 2012, Cognition.

[35]  D. Vorberg,et al.  The time course of response inhibition in masked priming , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  Elisabeth Pacherie,et al.  The anarchic hand syndrome and utilization behavior: a window onto agentive self-awareness. , 2007, Functional neurology.

[37]  P. Haggard,et al.  Voluntary action and conscious awareness , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  Angela J. Yu,et al.  Uncertainty, Neuromodulation, and Attention , 2005, Neuron.

[39]  C. Frith.  The self in action: Lessons from delusions of control , 2005, Consciousness and Cognition.

[40]  M. Hallett,et al.  The neural processes underlying self-agency. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  Cue integration and the perception of action in intentional binding , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.