An approach to membrane fouling characterization by confocal scanning laser microscopy

Abstract Confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM) is an optical microscopic technique that, among other advantages, can provide high-resolution images from different depths of a three-dimensional object, therefore rendering invasive techniques unnecessary for sample preparation. CSLM in fluorescence mode is a powerful technique in biological applications and in the microscopy of food materials. The main goal of the present study is to develop the appropriate strategies so that CSLM can be used for membrane fouling characterization during the filtration of protein solutions. Single and binary solutions of BSA–fluorescein and ovalbumin–Texas red conjugates were filtered using 0.8 μm polycarbonate membranes. Samples of the membranes at the end of the filtration runs were analyzed by CSLM. A standardized protocol for sample analysis by CSLM was developed and applied in this study. The most significant results show that CSLM can be used to visualize BSA–fluorescein and ovalbumin–Texas red conjugates on top of and inside the membranes, and that they can be distinguished when they jointly foul the membrane. Finally, if the appropriate sectioning is applied a 3D reconstruction of the membrane and the adsorbed/deposited protein can be obtained which give information on the fouling morphology.

[1]  A. Zydney,et al.  Effects of intermolecular thiol–disulfide interchange reactions on bsa fouling during microfiltration , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  E. P. Jacobs,et al.  Non-invasive visualization of the fouling of microfiltration membranes by ultrasonic time-domain reflectometry , 2002 .

[3]  A. Cañas,et al.  Evaluación de la colmatación de una membrana mediante medidas eléctricas y de la composición química de su superficie , 2000 .

[4]  E. Drioli,et al.  Study of Fouling Phenomena in Apple Juice Clarification by Enzyme Membrane Reactor , 1998 .

[5]  A. Zydney,et al.  Hydraulic permeability of protein layers deposited during ultrafiltration , 1991 .

[6]  M. Caric,et al.  Fouling of inorganic membranes by adsorption of whey proteins , 2000 .

[7]  M. Dal-Cin,et al.  A surface spectroscopic study of membranes fouled by pulp mill effluent , 1998 .

[8]  C. Charcosset.  Comparison of microporous membrane morphologies using confocal scanning laser microscopy , 2000 .

[9]  C. Charcosset,et al.  Characterization of microporous membrane morphology using confocal scanning laser microscopy , 2000 .

[10]  A. D. Marshall,et al.  Influence of feed properties on membrane fouling in crossflow microfiltration of particulate suspensions , 2000 .

[11]  A. Fane,et al.  Membrane fouling and its control in environmental applications , 2000 .

[12]  William B. Krantz,et al.  Investigation of membrane fouling and cleaning using ultrasonic time-domain reflectometry , 2000 .

[13]  Q. Gan.  Beer Clarification by cross-flow microfiltration-effect of surface hydrodynamics and reversed membrane morphology , 2001 .

[14]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  Protein Fouling of Track-Etched Polycarbonate Microfiltration Membranes , 1994 .

[15]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  Protein fouling of surface-modified polymeric microfiltration membranes , 1996 .

[16]  Robert W. Field,et al.  Critical flux measurement for model colloids , 1999 .

[17]  A. Mccarthy.  Experimental Techniques for Quantifying the Cake Mass, the Cake and Membrane Resistances and the Specific Cake Resistance during Crossflow Filtration of Microbial Suspensions , 2002 .

[18]  P. Pellerin,et al.  Relative Impact of Major Wine Polysaccharides on the Performances of an Organic Microfiltration Membrane , 1999, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[19]  Kiyotaka Sakai,et al.  Optimum dialysis membrane for endotoxin blocking , 2003 .

[20]  Q. Gan,et al.  Properties of microfiltration membranes: Flux loss during constant pressure permeation of bovine serum albumin , 1991, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[21]  D. M. Shotton,et al.  Confocal scanning optical microscopy and its applications for biological specimens , 1989 .

[22]  James B. Pawley,et al.  Fundamental Limits in Confocal Microscopy , 2006 .

[23]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Mechanisms for BSA fouling during microfiltration , 1995 .

[24]  F. Ding,et al.  Determination of ζ-Potential by Measuring Electroosmotic Flux in an Alternating Electric Field and Its Applications in the Study of Membrane Fouling , 2000 .

[25]  D. Pyle,et al.  Investigation of single protein adsorption on ion exchangers using confocal laser scanning microscopy , 1999 .

[26]  S. Kuiper,et al.  Filtration of lager beer with microsieves: flux, permeate, haze and in-line microscope observations , 2002 .

[27]  J. Pawley,et al.  Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy , 1990, Springer US.

[28]  R. Lencki,et al.  Effect of fractal flocculation behavior on fouling layer resistance during apple juice microfiltration , 1999 .

[29]  Investigation of fouling mechanisms governing permeate flux in the crossflow microfiltration of beer , 1997 .

[30]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  Membrane fouling during microfiltration of protein mixtures , 1996 .

[31]  Thomas Linden,et al.  Visualising protein adsorption to ion-exchange membranes by confocal microscopy , 2002 .

[32]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  In situ monitoring techniques for concentration polarization and fouling phenomena in membrane filtration. , 2003, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[33]  M. Kula,et al.  Visualizing two-component protein diffusion in porous adsorbents by confocal scanning laser microscopy. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[34]  M. Moutounet,et al.  Fouling of organic microfiltration membranes by wine constituents: importance, relative impact of wine polysccharides and polyphenols and incidence of membrane properties , 2002 .

[35]  K. Choo,et al.  Understanding Membrane Fouling in Terms of Surface Free Energy Changes , 2000 .

[36]  S. Hell.  Toward fluorescence nanoscopy , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[37]  A. Zydney,et al.  Protein fouling during microfiltration: comparative behavior of different model proteins. , 1997, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[38]  R. Ghosh.  Study of membrane fouling by BSA using pulsed injection technique , 2002 .

[39]  J. Benavente,et al.  Effect of adsorbed protein on the hydraulic permeability, membrane and streaming potential values measured across a microporous membrane , 1998 .

[40]  A. Ljunglöf,et al.  Visualising intraparticle protein transport in porous adsorbents by confocal microscopy. , 1998, Journal of chromatography. A.