Seismic moment distribution revisited: II. Moment conservation principle

SUMMARY We compare the tectonic rate with earthquake data using several theoretical distributions to approximate the seismic moment‐frequency relation. We derive formulae to estimate parameters of the seismic moment distributions by comparing the earthquake occurrence rate with tectonic strain. We analyse the tectonic moment rate and the earthquake moment distribution for several types of tectonic environments, including subduction zones, plate bounding transform faults and deforming continental regions. In this analysis we use finer subdivisions of tectonic regions to infer whether earthquake size distribution properties established previously for large provinces (Flinn‐Engdahl seismic regions) could be applied to smaller zones extending over a few hundred kilometres. Although the shortness of the available earthquake catalogues makes our results less reliable, several conclusions can be drawn from the analysis. The universality of the β-parameter (the slope of the moment‐frequency relation) is reasonably well confirmed for all of these tectonic regions and their subdivisions. In each region, we estimate the strain rate or relative plate motion from a plate tectonic model, active fault data or geodetic data. According to the moment‐frequency relation, the ratio of the tectonic moment rate to the earthquake rate depends on the β value, the corner magnitude (mc) and the effective seismogenic thickness. We find that this ratio does not vary systematically with the relative plate velocity, the ratio of parallel to perpendicular plate motion, time since the last major earthquake and the length of fault zone segments established by previous earthquake history. We obtain similar results for the western United States and southeast Asia; the corner magnitude is approximately equal to that for the circum-Pacific Rim and there is no systematic dependence of the mc parameter on a geographic region or strain rate. Assuming the commonly accepted values for seismogenic thickness, elastic modulus and 100 per cent seismic coupling, the corner magnitude values for plate boundary zones and continental areas are 8.3‐8.8, i.e. similar to those values obtained by statistical analysis.

[1]  X. Pichon,et al.  Velocity field in Asia inferred from Quaternary fault slip rates and Global Positioning System observations , 2000 .

[2]  Y. Kagan,et al.  Probabilistic forecasting of earthquakes , 2000 .

[3]  Peter Molnar,et al.  Himalayan Seismic Hazard , 2001, Science.

[4]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Seismic moment‐frequency relation for shallow earthquakes: Regional comparison , 1997 .

[5]  X. Pichon,et al.  Full interseismic locking of the Nankai and Japan‐west Kurile subduction zones: An analysis of uniform elastic strain accumulation in Japan constrained by permanent GPS , 2000 .

[6]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  New seismic gap hypothesis: Five years after , 1995 .

[7]  A. Dziewoński,et al.  Centroid-moment tensor solutions for April–June 2000 , 2001 .

[8]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Seismic Gap Hypothesis: Ten years after , 1991 .

[9]  D. Sornette,et al.  General theory of the modified Gutenberg-Richter law for large seismic moments , 1999 .

[10]  W. Holt,et al.  Deformation kinematics in the western United States determined from Quaternary fault slip rates and recent geodetic data , 1999 .

[11]  R. Mccaffrey.  Statistical significance of the seismic coupling coefficient , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[12]  C. Scholz,et al.  On the mechanism of seismic decoupling and back arc spreading at subduction zones , 1995 .

[13]  R. Mccaffrey.  Influences of recurrence times and fault zone temperatures on the age‐rate dependence of subduction zone seismicity , 1997 .

[14]  A. Dziewoński,et al.  Centroid-moment tensor solutions for April–June, 1983 , 1983 .

[15]  A. Erdélyi,et al.  Higher Transcendental Functions , 1954 .

[16]  R. Madariaga,et al.  Faulting process of the August 8, 1993, Guam earthquake: A thrust event in an otherwise weakly coupled subduction zone , 1996 .

[17]  Richard G. Gordon,et al.  Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions , 1994 .

[18]  David D. Jackson,et al.  A mutually consistent seismic-hazard source model for southern California , 1999 .

[19]  Y. Kagan.  Seismic moment distribution revisited: I. Statistical results , 2002 .

[20]  David Vere-Jones,et al.  Remarks on the accelerated moment release model: problems of model formulation, simulation and estimation , 2001 .

[21]  A. Erdélyi,et al.  Higher Transcendental Functions , 1954 .

[22]  V. Pisarenko.  Non‐linear growth of cumulative flood losses with time , 1998 .

[23]  Richard G. Gordon,et al.  Current plate motions , 1990 .

[24]  C. Frohlich,et al.  Earthquake focal mechanisms, moment tensors, and the consistency of seismic activity near plate boundaries , 1992 .

[25]  Stuart P. Nishenko,et al.  Circum-Pacific seismic potential: 1989–1999 , 1991 .

[26]  G. Blewitt,et al.  On the determination of a global strain rate model , 2000 .

[27]  F. Amelung,et al.  Earthquake scaling laws for creeping and non‐creeping faults , 1997 .

[28]  David D. Jackson,et al.  Seismic hazards in southern California: probable earthquakes, 1994 to 2024 , 1996 .

[29]  Elizabeth Schwerer,et al.  Probability of Rupture of Multiple Fault Segments , 2000 .

[30]  Y. Kagan.  Universality of the Seismic Moment-frequency Relation , 1999 .

[31]  H. Raynaud,et al.  On rare and extreme events , 2001 .

[32]  C. Frohlich.  Display and quantitative assessment of distributions of earthquake focal mechanisms , 2001 .

[33]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  On the variation of b-values with earthquake size , 1994 .

[34]  Stuart P. Nishenko,et al.  Seismic gaps and plate tectonics: Seismic potential for major boundaries , 1979 .