Cost Analysis and Life-Cycle Environmental Impacts of Three Value-Added Novel Bioproducts: Processing and Production

A life-cycle assessment framework was used to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with processing, producing, and marketing three novel value-added bioproducts, intended as substitutes for peat growing media and soil amendments, namely: dried composted forestry bark (DCFB); dehydrated topdressing (DTD); and organic bio-fertilizer (OBF). Total cost of processing and producing the final bioproducts ($ t−1) was highest for OBF and lowest for DCFB. Environmental and ecological impacts were quantified and compared using indicators commonly used in the scholarly literature to capture global warming, and human and eco-toxicity impacts. Global warming impacts (measured in terms of total CO2-equivalent of dehydrated final bioproduct) were highest for OBF, followed by DTD, and then DCFB. Among the human and eco-toxicity indicators considered, NOx emissions were highest, followed by SO2, and lowest for CO emissions, for all three bioproducts.

[1]  M. D. Pérez-Murcia,et al.  Composts from distillery wastes as peat substitutes for transplant production , 2008 .

[2]  J. Tallis.  Peat , 1974, Nature.

[3]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 1: general methodology and results , 2005 .

[4]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Life cycle cost analysis of fuel ethanol produced from cassava in Thailand , 2008 .

[5]  P. Allen,et al.  The capitalist composition of organic: The potential of markets in fulfilling the promise of organic agriculture , 2000 .

[6]  Sara González-García,et al.  Life cycle assessment of raw materials for non-wood pulp mills: Hemp and flax , 2010 .

[7]  P. Capel,et al.  Fertilizer Consumption and Energy Input for 16 Crops in the United States , 2014, Natural Resources Research.

[8]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2013 .

[9]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[10]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  May Wu,et al.  Energy and Emission Benefits of Alternative Transportation Liquid Fuels Derived from Switchgrass: A Fuel Life Cycle Assessment , 2006, Biotechnology progress.

[12]  R. Barberis,et al.  COMPOST AS GROWING MEDIUM: CHEMICAL, PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS , 1993 .

[13]  Hong Huo,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of soybean-derived biodiesel and renewable fuels. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Inga Gimbutaite,et al.  Air pollution burning different kinds of wood in small power boilers , 2008 .

[15]  P. Alexander,et al.  Peat in horticulture and conservation: the UK response to a changing world , 2008 .

[16]  Nicholas P. Cheremisinoff,et al.  AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors , 2016 .

[17]  Chongrak Polprasert,et al.  Organic Waste Recycling: Technology and Management , 2007 .

[18]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 2: landfilling compared to other treatment methods , 2005 .

[19]  O. Jolliet,et al.  Harmonisation of Environmental Life Cycle Assessment for Agriculture , 1997 .

[20]  R. S. Clymo,et al.  Implications of Peat Accumulation at Point Escuminac, New Brunswick , 1993, Quaternary Research.

[21]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life cycle assessment , 1997, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[22]  Sven Lundie,et al.  LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF FOOD WASTE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS , 2005 .

[23]  Emmanuel K. Yiridoe,et al.  Nonmarket cobenefits and economic feasibility of on-farm biogas energy production , 2009 .

[24]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Ethanol Production Using Corn, Switchgrass, and Wood; Biodiesel Production Using Soybean and Sunflower , 2005 .

[25]  Takeo Shiina,et al.  A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products. , 2009 .

[26]  Line Rochefort,et al.  Threats and protection for peatlands in Eastern Canada , 2004 .

[27]  Varun,et al.  Life cycle assessment of sugar industry: A review , 2011 .

[28]  Arthur Conacher,et al.  Organic Farming and the Environment, with Particular Reference to Australia: A Review , 1998 .

[29]  J. Daigle,et al.  CANADIAN PEAT HARVESTING AND THE ENVIRONMENT , 2002 .

[30]  Robert J. S. Beeton,et al.  Australia: State of the environment 2006 , 2006 .

[31]  Nigel T. Roulet,et al.  Peatlands, carbon storage, greenhouse gases, and the Kyoto Protocol: Prospects and significance for Canada , 2000, Wetlands.

[32]  D W Pennington,et al.  Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications , 2004 .

[33]  Y. Hadar,et al.  THE USE OF COMPOSTED SEPARATED CATTLE MANURE AND GRAPE MARC AS PEAT SUBSTITUTE IN HORTICULTURE , 1986 .

[34]  Larry Hughes,et al.  Canadian greenhouse gas emissions: 1990–2000 , 1997 .

[35]  Mohd Khan.  From Landfill Gas to Energy: Technologies and Challenges , 2011 .

[36]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[37]  R. Mohee,et al.  Life cycle analysis of compost incorporated sugarcane bioenergy systems in Mauritius , 1999 .