The Dative Alternation in Norwegian Child Language

Research has shown that givenness is one of several factors that influence the choice of word order with the Dative Alternation in languages such as English. This paper investigates to what extent Norwegian children between the ages of 4;2 and 6;0 are sensitive to this factor in production. In order to test this, an experiment was carried out in which the children were prompted to produce structures involving ditransitive verbs when either the Theme or the Recipient was given. The results show that the children are sensitive to the impact of givenness, but while this is expressed through the choice of word order in Theme-given contexts (yielding the prepositional dative), it is expressed by argument omission in the Recipient-given contexts (resulting in one-argument responses with only the Theme overtly produced).

[1]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing , 1988 .

[2]  J. Bresnan,et al.  The Gradience of the Dative Alternation , 2008 .

[3]  W. O'grady,et al.  Word order preferences for direct and indirect objects in children learning Korean , 2002, Journal of Child Language.

[4]  Lars Hellan.  The phrasal nature of double object clusters , 1990 .

[5]  Michelle A. Hollander,et al.  The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation , 1989 .

[6]  Marit Westergaard,et al.  The Acquisition of Word Order: Micro-cues, Information Structure, and Economy , 2009 .

[7]  V. Cook.  A note on indirect objects , 1976, Journal of Child Language.

[8]  E. Conwell,et al.  Early syntactic productivity: Evidence from dative shift , 2007, Cognition.

[9]  W. Snyder.  The structure and acquisition of English dative constructions , 1997 .

[10]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Predicting the dative alternation , 2007 .

[11]  Tor A. Åfarli,et al.  The Syntax of Norwegian Passive Constructions , 1992 .

[12]  Malka Rappaport Hovav,et al.  The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity1 , 2008, Journal of Linguistics.

[13]  Merete Anderssen,et al.  The Acquisition of Compositional Definiteness in Norwegian , 2007 .

[14]  Marit Westergaard,et al.  The Acquisition of Apparent Optionality: Word Order in Subject and Object Shift Constructions in Norwegian , 2010 .

[15]  Marit Westergaard,et al.  Word order in wh-questions in a North Norwegian dialect: some evidence from an acquisition study , 2003, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[16]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  Double Objects Again , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[17]  M. Tungseth.  Verbal prepositions in Norwegian. Paths, places and possession , 2006 .

[18]  Judith Aissen,et al.  Markedness and Subject Choice in Optimality Theory , 1999 .

[19]  C. Osgood,et al.  Acquisition of bi-transitive sentences: pre-linguistic determinants of language acquisition , 1981, Journal of Child Language.

[20]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering , 2015 .

[21]  Susannah Kirby,et al.  A statistical model of the grammatical choices in child production of dative sentences , 2012 .

[22]  Heidi Harley,et al.  Possession and the double object construction , 2002 .

[23]  R. Larson.  On the double object construction , 1988 .