Impacts of tree canopy structure on wind flows and fire propagation simulated with FIRETEC

Introduction Forest fuel management in the context of fire prevention generally induces heterogeneous spatial patterns of vegetation. However, the impact of the canopy structure on both wind flows and fire behavior is not well understood.Material and methods Here, a coupled atmosphere wildfire behavior model, HIGRAD/FIRETEC, was used to investigate the effects of canopy treatment on wind field and fire behavior in a typical Mediterranean pine ecosystem.Discussion First, the treatment-induced winds were simulated with the model. We observed that with decreasing cover fraction the wind velocity increased within the treated zone. The wind spatial variability increased when the vegetation was aggregated into larger clumps. Fire simulations indicated that a decrease of fire intensity occurred after several meters of propagation in the treated zone. This intensity decrease was significant with a cover fraction below 25%, but negligible with a cover fraction greater than 50%. The treatment also induced a more significant inclination of the plume away from vertical. The size of the tree clumps did not show significant effects on fire behavior.Conclusion This study was a preliminary investigation of wind/fire interaction over various canopy treatments, by using a physically based model. It gives some practical considerations for discerning the appropriate cover fraction and open perspectives for further investigations.

[1]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  The impact of high resolution wind field simulations on the accuracy of fire growth predictions , 2006 .

[2]  Lucile Rossi,et al.  Fire Spread Experiment Across Mediterranean Shrub: Influence of Wind on Flame Front Properties , 2006 .

[3]  François Pimont,et al.  Validation of FIRETEC wind-flows over a canopy and a fuel-break , 2009 .

[4]  Philip Cunningham,et al.  Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere–fire model: Basic fire behavior and dependence on wind speed , 2005 .

[5]  E. Patton.  Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flow Above and Within a Plant Canopy , 1997 .

[6]  Russell Andrew Parsons.  Spatial variability in forest fuels: Simulation modeling and effects on fire behavior , 2007 .

[7]  Martin E. Alexander,et al.  Variation in wind and crown fire behaviour in a northern jack pine - black spruce forest 1 , 2004 .

[8]  N. Cheney,et al.  Prediction of Fire Spread in Grasslands , 1998 .

[9]  J. Dupuy,et al.  Effects of vegetation description parameters on forest fire behavior with FIRETEC , 2006 .

[10]  Patricia L. Andrews,et al.  Fuels Management-How to Measure Success: Conference Proceedings , 2006 .

[11]  E. F. Bradley,et al.  A wind tunnel investigation into the aerodynamic effect of forest clearings on the nesting of Abbott's Booby on Christmas Island: Progress report on a study commissioned by the Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service , 1987 .

[12]  M IoannisD.,et al.  Canopy fuel characteristics and potential crown fire behavior in Aleppo pine ( Pinus halepensis Mill . ) forests , 2007 .

[13]  Judith Winterkamp,et al.  Modeling interactions between fire and atmosphere in discrete element fuel beds , 2005 .

[14]  Dominique Morvan,et al.  Numerical study of a crown fire spreading toward a fuel break using a multiphase physical model. , 2005 .

[15]  X. Lee.  Air motion within and above forest vegetation in non-ideal conditions , 2000 .

[16]  T. A. Black,et al.  Wind and Trees: A wind tunnel study of turbulent airflow in forest clearcuts , 1995 .

[17]  D. Alexandrian,et al.  Forest Fuels Management in Europe , 2006 .

[18]  L. Trabaud,et al.  Recovery of burnt Pinus halepensis Mill. Forests. I. Understorey and litter phytomass development after wildfire , 1985 .

[19]  J. Grace,et al.  Wind and Trees: Tree physiological responses , 1995 .

[20]  Charles W. McHugh,et al.  Simulation of long-term landscape-level fuel treatment effects on large wildfires , 2006 .

[21]  J. Finnigan.  Turbulence in plant canopies , 2000 .