Delinquency, Social Skills and the Structure of Peer Relations: Assessing Criminological Theories by Social Network Theory

This article explores the plausibility of the conflicting theoretical assumptions underlying the main criminological perspectives on juvenile delinquents, their peer relations and social skills: the social ability model, represented by Sutherland's theory of differential associations, and the social disability model, represented by Hirschi's control theory. It does so by applying the principles associated with Granovetter's theory of strong and weak ties, drawing out its theoretical implications for the criminological theories and deriving a number of hypotheses. The article uses "strategic research materials" in the form of a data set strongly biased towards the social disability model and containing information on co-offending relations among a population (N = 580) of juveniles in a Swedish town during a three-year period. Results from cross-sectional empirical analyses using, among other things, the Quadratic Assignment Procedure, clearly support the social ability model. The robustness of the initial analyses is checked through longitudinal analyses applying actor-oriented statistical models for network evolution. The article's implications for criminological, as well as multidisciplinary, research are discussed.

[1]  D. Haynie Delinquent Peers Revisited: Does Network Structure Matter?1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Dana L. Haynie,et al.  Friendship Networks and Delinquency: The Relative Nature of Peer Delinquency , 2002 .

[3]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Manual for SIENA version 2.1 , 2005 .

[4]  M. Felson,et al.  Routine activity and rational choice , 2004 .

[5]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and Refutations , 1963 .

[6]  Norbert Elias,et al.  What Is Sociology , 1978 .

[7]  David Krackhardt,et al.  PREDICTING WITH NETWORKS: NONPARAMETRIC MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF DYADIC DATA * , 1988 .

[8]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[9]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and refutations;: The growth of scientific knowledge , 1972 .

[10]  Robert K. Merton,et al.  Three Fragments From a Sociologist's Notebooks: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials , 1987 .

[11]  T. Snijders Models for longitudinal network datain , 2005 .

[12]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis , 2005 .

[13]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Uncertainty, Cooperation, and Crime: Understanding the Decision to Co-offend , 1998 .

[14]  K. Dodge,et al.  ‘Superiority’ is in the Eye of the Beholder: A Comment on Sutton, Smith, and Swettenham , 2001 .

[15]  R. Matsueda,et al.  THE DYNAMICS OF DELINQUENT PEERS AND DELINQUENT BEHAVIOR , 1998 .

[16]  James C. Hackler,et al.  Criminal Behavior Systems: A Typology. , 1968 .

[17]  G. Poggi Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology , 1969 .

[18]  Mark Warr Companions in Crime: The Social Aspects of Criminal Conduct , 2002 .

[19]  C. Veneziano,et al.  Knowledge of Social Skills among Institutionalized Juvenile Delinquents , 1988 .

[20]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  Frank M. Weerman,et al.  Students’ delinquency and correlates with strong and weaker ties : A study of students’ networks in Dutch high schools , 2003 .

[22]  Pete Smith,et al.  Bullying and ‘Theory of Mind’: A Critique of the ‘Social Skills Deficit’ View of Anti‐Social Behaviour , 2001 .

[23]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and refutations;: The growth of scientific knowledge , 1972 .

[24]  D. Wayne Osgood,et al.  Influence and Similarity Among Friends: An Integrative Model Applied to Incarcerated Adolescents , 1989 .

[25]  R. Akers Social Learning and Social Structure: , 1997 .

[26]  Linton C. Freeman,et al.  The Sociological Concept of "Group": An Empirical Test of Two Models , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  Ronald L. Akers,et al.  Social learning and social structure : a general theory of crime and deviance , 1999 .

[28]  D. Cressey,et al.  Principles of Criminology. , 1947 .

[29]  Chris Baerveldt,et al.  Just like normal: A social network study of the relation between petty crime and the intimacy of adolescent friendships. , 1999 .

[30]  S. Feld The Focused Organization of Social Ties , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  A. Cohen,et al.  Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. , 1955 .

[32]  G. A. Avanesov,et al.  The Principles of Criminology , 1982 .

[33]  J. Sarnecki Delinquent Networks: Youth Co-Offending in Stockholm , 2001 .

[34]  F. Weerman Co-Offending as Social Exchange Explaining. Characteristics of Co-Offending , 2003 .

[35]  J. Sarnecki Delinquent networks in Sweden , 1990 .

[36]  T. Hirschi Causes of Delinquency. , 1970, British medical journal.

[37]  K. Dodge,et al.  A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. , 1994 .

[38]  David Krackardt,et al.  QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness , 1987 .

[39]  N. Crick,et al.  Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. , 1995, Child development.

[40]  N. Crick,et al.  Relational aggression: The role of intent attributions, feelings of distress, and provocation type , 1995, Development and Psychopathology.

[41]  Christian Steglich,et al.  Beyond dyadic interdependence: Actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors , 2007 .

[42]  E. Press Delinquent Boys—The Culture of the Gang , 1955 .

[43]  Mark Warr ORGANIZATION AND INSTIGATION IN DELINQUENT GROUPS , 1996 .

[44]  S. Hansell,et al.  Competing Conceptions of Delinquent Peer Relations. , 1980 .

[45]  G. Jensen Sociology of delinquency : current issues , 1981 .

[46]  Luciano Rossoni,et al.  Models and methods in social network analysis , 2006 .

[47]  P. Holland,et al.  A Method for Detecting Structure in Sociometric Data , 1970, American Journal of Sociology.

[48]  J. Davis Structural Balance, Mechanical Solidarity, and Interpersonal Relations , 1963, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  Pete Smith,et al.  Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? , 1999 .

[50]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  A test of structural features of granovetter's strength of weak ties theory , 1980 .