Going beyond the Flood Insurance Rate Map: insights from flood hazard map co-production

Abstract. Flood hazard mapping in the United States (US) is deeply tied to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Consequently, publicly available flood maps provide essential information for insurance purposes, but they do not necessarily provide relevant information for non-insurance aspects of flood risk management (FRM) such as public education and emergency planning. Recent calls for flood hazard maps that support a wider variety of FRM tasks highlight the need to deepen our understanding about the factors that make flood maps useful and understandable for local end users. In this study, social scientists and engineers explore opportunities for improving the utility and relevance of flood hazard maps through the co-production of maps responsive to end users' FRM needs. Specifically, two-dimensional flood modeling produced a set of baseline hazard maps for stakeholders of the Tijuana River valley, US, and Los Laureles Canyon in Tijuana, Mexico. Focus groups with natural resource managers, city planners, emergency managers, academia, non-profit, and community leaders refined the baseline hazard maps by triggering additional modeling scenarios and map revisions. Several important end user preferences emerged, such as (1) legends that frame flood intensity both qualitatively and quantitatively, and (2) flood scenario descriptions that report flood magnitude in terms of rainfall, streamflow, and its relation to an historic event. Regarding desired hazard map content, end users' requests revealed general consistency with mapping needs reported in European studies and guidelines published in Australia. However, requested map content that is not commonly produced included (1) standing water depths following the flood, (2) the erosive potential of flowing water, and (3) pluvial flood hazards, or flooding caused directly by rainfall. We conclude that the relevance and utility of commonly produced flood hazard maps can be most improved by illustrating pluvial flood hazards and by using concrete reference points to describe flooding scenarios rather than exceedance probabilities or frequencies.

[1]  Flood Risk Management: Call for a National Strategy , 2014 .

[2]  T. Kjeldsen,et al.  Uncertainty in flood frequency analysis , 2014 .

[3]  M. Kendall.  Rank Correlation Methods , 1949 .

[4]  L. Bouwer.  Have disaster losses increased due to anthropogenic climate change , 2011 .

[5]  Brett F. Sanders,et al.  Mesh type tradeoffs in 2D hydrodynamic modeling of flooding with a Godunov-based flow solver , 2014 .

[6]  Craig Fischenich,et al.  Stability thresholds for stream restoration materials , 2001 .

[7]  B. Merz,et al.  Flood loss reduction of private households due to building precautionary measures - lessons learned from the Elbe flood in August 2002 , 2005 .

[8]  Venkatesh Merwade,et al.  Uncertainty in Flood Inundation Mapping: Current Issues and Future Directions , 2008 .

[9]  Carlo De Michele,et al.  Multivariate Extreme Value Methods , 2013 .

[10]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Thin Grey Lines: Confrontations With Risk on Colorado's Front Range , 2017, CHI.

[11]  Brett F. Sanders,et al.  Structural Damage Prediction in a High-Velocity Urban Dam-Break Flood: Field-Scale Assessment of Predictive Skill , 2012 .

[12]  J. P. Leitão,et al.  Stochastic Urban Pluvial Flood Hazard Maps Based upon a Spatial-Temporal Rainfall Generator , 2015 .

[13]  Jared T. Brown.  Introduction to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) , 2017 .

[14]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Flood-plain mapping: a critical discussion of deterministic and probabilistic approaches , 2010 .

[15]  F. Martini,et al.  Flood risk mapping in Europe, experiences and best practices , 2009 .

[16]  J. Stedinger,et al.  Flood Frequency Analysis in the United States: Time to Update , 2008 .

[17]  Christophe Geuzaine,et al.  Gmsh: A 3‐D finite element mesh generator with built‐in pre‐ and post‐processing facilities , 2009 .

[18]  B. Sanders.  Hydrodynamic Modeling of Urban Flood Flows and Disaster Risk Reduction , 2017 .

[19]  Jasper A. Vrugt,et al.  Predicting nonstationary flood frequencies: Evidence supports an updated stationarity thesis in the United States , 2017 .

[20]  M. Feldman.  Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data , 1994 .

[21]  G. Lenderink,et al.  Increase in hourly precipitation extremes beyond expectations from temperature changes , 2008 .

[22]  M. Nones.  Flood hazard maps in the European context , 2017 .

[23]  H. B. Mann.  Nonparametric Tests Against Trend , 1945 .

[24]  J. Poesen,et al.  Resistance of soils to concentrated flow erosion: A review , 2007 .

[25]  H. Moel,et al.  Flood maps in Europe – methods, availability and use , 2009 .

[26]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  New criterion for the stability of a human body in floodwaters , 2014 .

[27]  B. Merz,et al.  Flood Risk Mapping At The Local Scale: Concepts and Challenges , 2007 .

[28]  Klaus J. Wagner,et al.  Evaluation of flood hazard maps in print and web mapping services as information tools in flood risk communication. , 2009 .

[29]  Jonathan Richard Shewchuk,et al.  Triangle: Engineering a 2D Quality Mesh Generator and Delaunay Triangulator , 1996, WACG.

[30]  L. Dilling,et al.  Creating usable science: Opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy , 2011 .

[31]  V. Ponce,et al.  Runoff Curve Number: Has It Reached Maturity? , 1996 .

[32]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Adaptation to flood risk: Results of international paired flood event studies , 2017 .

[33]  R. Nicholls,et al.  Future flood losses in major coastal cities , 2013 .

[34]  Roger Alexander Falconer,et al.  Formula of incipient velocity for flooded vehicles , 2011 .

[35]  Laura Giurca Vasilescu,et al.  Disaster Management CYCLE – a theoretical approach , 2008 .

[36]  F. Diermanse,et al.  Probabilistic flood hazard maps for Jakarta derived from a stochastic rain‐storm generator , 2016 .

[37]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Hydraulic modeling of the 2011 New Madrid Floodway activation: a case study on floodway activation controls , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[38]  B. Merz,et al.  Is flow velocity a significant parameter in flood damage modelling , 2009 .

[39]  Susan L. Cutter,et al.  Correction: The Unsustainable Trend of Natural Hazard Losses in the United States, Sustainability 2011, 3 , 2157-2181 , 2012 .

[40]  Graham A. Tobin,et al.  Efficient and effective? The 100-year flood in the communication and perception of flood risk , 2007 .

[41]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[42]  Chris Kilsby,et al.  Enhanced efficiency of pluvial flood risk estimation in urban areas using spatial–temporal rainfall simulations , 2012 .

[43]  Sven Fuchs,et al.  Evaluating cartographic design in flood risk mapping , 2009 .

[44]  D. Feldman,et al.  Making Science Useful to Decision Makers: Climate Forecasts, Water Management, and Knowledge Networks , 2009 .

[45]  Chris Eugene Zervas.  Extreme water levels of the United States 1893-2010 , 2013 .

[46]  Stefan Kienberger,et al.  The Disaster-Knowledge Matrix – Reframing and evaluating the knowledge challenges in disaster risk reduction , 2015 .

[47]  Teun Terpstra,et al.  Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[48]  Karen Hammad,et al.  Infectious diseases following natural disasters: prevention and control measures , 2012, Expert review of anti-infective therapy.

[49]  Amir AghaKouchak,et al.  Compounding effects of sea level rise and fluvial flooding , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Brett F. Sanders,et al.  ParBreZo: A parallel, unstructured grid, Godunov-type, shallow-water code for high-resolution flood inundation modeling at the regional scale , 2010 .

[51]  Stefan Rahmstorf,et al.  A decade of weather extremes , 2012 .

[52]  A. Anonymus.  Handbook on good practices for flood mapping in Europe , 2007 .

[53]  David L. Feldman,et al.  KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS: MAKING SCIENCE USEFUL TO DECISION MAKERS , 2009 .

[54]  C. Ogden,et al.  Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: United States, 2007-2010. , 2012, Vital and health statistics. Series 11, Data from the National Health Survey.

[55]  David H. Guston,et al.  Integrating Climate Forecasts and Societal Decision Making: Challenges to an Emergent Boundary Organization , 2001 .

[56]  F. Massey.  The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit , 1951 .

[57]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Flood frequency hydrology: 1. Temporal, spatial, and causal expansion of information , 2008 .

[58]  Joseph Park,et al.  Scenario-Based Projection of Extreme Sea Levels , 2012 .

[59]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Combined fluvial and pluvial urban flood hazard analysis: concept development and application to Can Tho city, Mekong Delta, Vietnam , 2015 .

[60]  Kenneth J. Bagstad,et al.  Taxes, subsidies, and insurance as drivers of United States coastal development , 2007 .

[61]  D. Demeritt,et al.  Models of best practice in flood risk communication and management , 2014 .

[62]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  Flood insurance and floodplain management: the US experience , 2001 .

[63]  Volker Meyer,et al.  Recommendations for the user-specific enhancement of flood maps , 2012 .

[64]  Chris Kilsby,et al.  Pluvial flooding in European cities - A continental approach to urban flood modelling , 2017 .