Virtual Screening: Practical Application of Docking, Consensus Scoring and Rescoring Using Binding Free Energy

[1]  J. Tuszynski,et al.  Software for molecular docking: a review , 2017, Biophysical Reviews.

[2]  Christopher I. Bayly,et al.  Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[3]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[4]  William J. Allen,et al.  DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance , 2015, J. Comput. Chem..

[5]  G. Degliesposti,et al.  Binding Estimation after Refinement, a New Automated Procedure for the Refinement and Rescoring of Docked Ligands in Virtual Screening , 2009, Chemical biology & drug design.

[6]  Matthieu Montes,et al.  Benchmarking Data Sets for the Evaluation of Virtual Ligand Screening Methods: Review and Perspectives , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[7]  Giulio Rastelli,et al.  BEAR, a Novel Virtual Screening Methodology for Drug Discovery , 2011, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[8]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  S. Genheden,et al.  The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities , 2015, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[10]  Pieter F. W. Stouten,et al.  Fast prediction and visualization of protein binding pockets with PASS , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[11]  Jie Xia,et al.  Benchmarking methods and data sets for ligand enrichment assessment in virtual screening. , 2015, Methods.

[12]  C. E. Peishoff,et al.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[13]  Vibha Gupta,et al.  Standardization of virtual-screening and post-processing protocols relevant to in-silico drug discovery , 2018, 3 Biotech.

[14]  Ben M. Webb,et al.  Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER , 2016, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[15]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[16]  Ray Luo,et al.  Recent Developments and Applications of the MMPBSA Method , 2018, Front. Mol. Biosci..

[17]  Luca Pinzi,et al.  Refinement and Rescoring of Virtual Screening Results , 2019, Front. Chem..

[18]  Giulio Rastelli,et al.  BEAR, a Molecular Docking Refinement and Rescoring Method , 2013 .

[19]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[20]  Ruth Huey,et al.  Computational protein–ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite , 2016, Nature Protocols.

[21]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Exponential consensus ranking improves the outcome in docking and receptor ensemble docking , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[22]  Ben M. Webb,et al.  Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER , 2007, Current protocols in protein science.

[23]  P. Kollman,et al.  Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.

[24]  Yongyuth Yuthavong,et al.  Insights into antifolate resistance from malarial DHFR-TS structures , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[25]  Giulio Rastelli,et al.  Application of a post-docking procedure based on MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA on single and multiple protein conformations. , 2012, European journal of medicinal chemistry.

[26]  Miklos Feher,et al.  Consensus scoring for protein-ligand interactions. , 2006, Drug discovery today.

[27]  Mohammad Mahdi Jaghoori,et al.  1001 Ways to run AutoDock Vina for virtual screening , 2016, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[28]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..