Using Ligand‐Based Virtual Screening to Allosterically Stabilize the Activated State of a GPCR

G‐protein coupled receptors play an essential role in many biological processes. Despite an increase in the number of solved X‐ray crystal structures of G‐protein coupled receptors, capturing a G‐protein coupled receptor in its activated state for structural analysis has proven to be difficult. An unexplored paradigm is stabilization of one or more conformational states of a G‐protein coupled receptor via binding a small molecule to the intracellular loops. A short tetrazole peptidomimetic based on the photoactivated state of rhodopsin‐bound structure of Gtα(340–350) was previously designed and shown to stabilize the photoactivated state of rhodopsin, the G‐protein coupled receptor involved in vision. A pharmacophore model derived from the designed tetrazole tetrapeptide was used for ligand‐based virtual screening to enhance the possible discovery of novel scaffolds. Maybridge Hitfinder and National Cancer Institute diversity libraries were screened for compounds containing the pharmacophore. Forty‐seven compounds resulted from virtually screening the Maybridge library, whereas no hits resulted with the National Cancer Institute library. Three of the 47 Maybridge compounds were found to stabilize the MII state. As these compounds did not inhibit binding of transducin to photoactivated state of rhodopsin, they were assumed to be allosteric ligands. These compounds are potentially useful for crystallographic studies where complexes with these compounds might capture rhodopsin in its activated conformational state.

[1]  Shay Bar-Haim,et al.  G protein-coupled receptors: in silico drug discovery in 3D. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  H. Hamm,et al.  Potent Peptide Analogues of a G Protein Receptor-binding Region Obtained with a Combinatorial Library (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  G R Marshall,et al.  Light-activated rhodopsin induces structural binding motif in G protein alpha subunit. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  T. Klabunde,et al.  Structure-based drug discovery using GPCR homology modeling: successful virtual screening for antagonists of the alpha1A adrenergic receptor. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[5]  Garland R Marshall,et al.  Modulating G-protein coupled receptor/G-protein signal transduction by small molecules suggested by virtual screening. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[6]  G R Marshall,et al.  Factors governing helical preference of peptides containing multiple alpha,alpha-dialkyl amino acids. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  G. Marshall,et al.  Relative Strength of Cation-π vs Salt-Bridge Interactions: The Gtα(340−350) Peptide/Rhodopsin System , 2006 .

[8]  M. Bitensky,et al.  Reciprocal effects of an inhibitory factor on catalytic activity and noncatalytic cGMP binding sites of rod phosphodiesterase. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  W. Delano The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System , 2002 .

[10]  W. Dreyer,et al.  Rhodopsin content in the outer segment membranes of bovine and frog retinal rods. , 1974, Biochemistry.

[11]  Wolfgang Guba,et al.  Focused library design in GPCR projects on the example of 5‐HT2c agonists: Comparison of structure‐based virtual screening with ligand‐based search methods , 2005, Proteins.

[12]  G. Marshall,et al.  Conformational mimicry: Synthesis and solution conformation of a cyclic somatostatin hexapeptide containing a tetrazole cis amide bond surrogate , 1995, Biopolymers.

[13]  Bryan L Roth,et al.  G-protein-coupled receptors at a glance , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[14]  G. Marshall,et al.  Relative strength of cation-pi vs salt-bridge interactions: the Gtalpha(340-350) peptide/rhodopsin system. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  Garland R. Marshall,et al.  Conformational mimicry. 1. 1,5-Disubstituted tetrazole ring as a surrogate for the cis amide bond , 1988 .

[16]  Oliver P. Ernst,et al.  Crystal structure of opsin in its G-protein-interacting conformation , 2008, Nature.

[17]  Sadashiva S Karnik,et al.  Multiple Signaling States of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors , 2005, Pharmacological Reviews.

[18]  G. Klebe,et al.  Successful virtual screening for a submicromolar antagonist of the neurokinin-1 receptor based on a ligand-supported homology model. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[19]  M. A. Downs,et al.  Rhodopsin-interacting surface of the transducin γ subunit , 2006 .

[20]  G R Marshall,et al.  Conformational mimicry. II. An obligatory cis amide bond in a small linear peptide. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[21]  C. Altenbach,et al.  High-resolution distance mapping in rhodopsin reveals the pattern of helix movement due to activation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  H. Hamm,et al.  Site of G protein binding to rhodopsin mapped with synthetic peptides from the alpha subunit. , 1988, Science.

[23]  Arthur Christopoulos,et al.  Orthosteric/allosteric bitopic ligands: going hybrid at GPCRs. , 2009, Molecular interventions.

[24]  Pascale G. Charest,et al.  β-Arrestin-mediated activation of MAPK by inverse agonists reveals distinct active conformations for G protein-coupled receptors , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Arthur Christopoulos,et al.  Allosteric modulators of GPCRs: a novel approach for the treatment of CNS disorders , 2009, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[26]  Gerhard Hessler,et al.  Drug Design Strategies for Targeting G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptors , 2002, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[27]  U. Gether Uncovering molecular mechanisms involved in activation of G protein-coupled receptors. , 2000, Endocrine reviews.

[28]  K. Hofmann,et al.  Signal transfer from rhodopsin to the G-protein: evidence for a two-site sequential fit mechanism. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  F. Ehlert On the analysis of ligand-directed signaling at G protein-coupled receptors , 2008, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology.

[30]  Christina M. Taylor,et al.  Modeling of the complex between transducin and photoactivated rhodopsin, a prototypical G-protein-coupled receptor. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[31]  Andreas Evers,et al.  Virtual screening of biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors: comparative evaluation of protein- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[32]  M. Bitensky,et al.  Cooperative binding of the retinal rod G-protein, transducin, to light-activated rhodopsin. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[33]  D. Zaharevitz,et al.  Anticancer activity of BIM-46174, a new inhibitor of the heterotrimeric Galpha/Gbetagamma protein complex. , 2006, Cancer research.

[34]  K. Palczewski,et al.  Topology of Class A G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Insights Gained from Crystal Structures of Rhodopsins, Adrenergic and Adenosine Receptors , 2009, Molecular Pharmacology.

[35]  S. Sprang,et al.  Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4 −-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis , 1997, Cell.

[36]  Subramaniam Ananthan,et al.  Recent Advances in Structure-Based Virtual Screening of G-Protein Coupled Receptors , 2009, The AAPS Journal.

[37]  Xueliang Fang,et al.  Molecular modeling of the three-dimensional structure of dopamine 3 (D3) subtype receptor: discovery of novel and potent D3 ligands through a hybrid pharmacophore- and structure-based database searching approach. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[38]  Pascale G. Charest,et al.  Beta-arrestin-mediated activation of MAPK by inverse agonists reveals distinct active conformations for G protein-coupled receptors. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Andreas Evers,et al.  Sequence-derived three-dimensional pharmacophore models for G-protein-coupled receptors and their application in virtual screening. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[40]  G. Mcallister,et al.  Orphan G-protein-coupled receptors and natural ligand discovery. , 2001, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[41]  D. Zaharevitz,et al.  Anticancer Activity of BIM-46174, a New Inhibitor of the Heterotrimeric Gα/Gβγ Protein Complex , 2006 .

[42]  Didier Rognan,et al.  Protein‐based virtual screening of chemical databases. II. Are homology models of g‐protein coupled receptors suitable targets? , 2002, Proteins.

[43]  N. Gautam,et al.  Efficient Interaction with a Receptor Requires a Specific Type of Prenyl Group on the G Protein γ Subunit (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.