Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship

The recently developed h-index has been applied to the literature produced by senior British-based academics in librarianship and information science. The majority of those evaluated currently hold senior positions in UK information science and librarianship departments; however, a small number of staff in other departments and retired "founding fathers" were analyzed as well. The analysis was carried out using the Web of Science (Thomson Scientific, Philadelphia, PA) for the years from 1992 to October 2005, and included both second-authored papers and self-citations. The top-ranking British information scientist, Peter Willett, has an h-index of 31. However, it was found that Eugene Garfield, the founder of modern citation studies, has an even higher h-index of 36. These results support other studies suggesting that the h-index is a useful tool in the armory of bibliometrics.

[1]  A. Weller.  Editorial peer review , 2001 .

[2]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Citation counts and the Research Assessment Exercise V: Archaeology and the 2001 RAE , 2003, J. Documentation.

[3]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Do citations matter? , 1994, J. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  On the h-index - A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact , 2006, Scientometrics.

[5]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Ranking the research productivity of library and information science faculty and schools: An evaluation of data sources and research methods , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  J. Michael Brittain,et al.  A highly visible scientist - Jack Meadows , 2000, J. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Rustum Roy,et al.  Approximating total citation counts from first author counts and from total papers , 2005, Scientometrics.

[8]  Per Ottar Seglen,et al.  The skewness of science , 1992 .

[9]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[10]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Bennett Daviss,et al.  Growing pains for metabolomics: the newest 'omic science is producing results--and more data than researchers know what to do with , 2005 .

[12]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  A bibliometric profile of top-scientists a case study in chemical engineering , 2005, Scientometrics.

[13]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? , 2005, Scientometrics.