Over-marking and adjacent marking are influenced by sibship in male prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster

Scent over-marking occurs when an animal deposits its scent mark on top of the scent mark of a conspecific. Over-marking may provide advantages in the transfer of information to the individual whose scent is on top but not to the individual whose scent is on the bottom. We tested the hypothesis that over-marking is a competitive form of olfactory communication and that male prairie voles would over-mark the scent marks of same-sex conspecifics more than those of same-sex siblings. Two age-matched male voles (first male and second male) were placed successively into an arena in which they were allowed to explore freely and scent mark for 15 min at age 12, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52 d. The first male was placed into a clean arena, whereas the second male was placed into an arena containing either the scent marks of an age-matched male sibling or nonsibling. Age affected the total number of scent marks deposited by the voles; 12-20-d-old voles deposited fewer scent marks, over-marks and adjacent marks than did 28-52-d-old voles. Sibship did not affect the total number of scent marks deposited by the first and second voles but did affect the number of over-marks and adjacent marks deposited by the second vole. Siblings received significantly fewer over-marks and adjacent marks than did nonsiblings; this effect was most dramatic after the voles reached 28 d of age, a time coincident with the onset of puberty. Males separated from siblings and housed singly at 44-d-old and tested at 52-d-old, deposited significantly more over-marks and adjacent marks in arenas if the first vole was a nonsibling than if it was a sibling. This differential scent-marking supports the hypothesis that over-marking and adjacent marking are used as competitive forms of olfactory communication by male prairie voles.

[1]  R. Johnston,et al.  WHAT KIND OF INFORMATION DO MEADOW VOLES (MICROTUS PENNSYLVANICUS) USE TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE TOP AND BOTTOM SCENT OF AN OVER-MARK? , 1999 .

[2]  R. Johnston,et al.  Perception of scent over-marks by golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus): novel mechanisms for determining which individual's mark is on top. , 1998, Journal of comparative psychology.

[3]  R. Johnston,et al.  Kin recognition in golden hamsters: evidence for kinship odours , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  R. Johnston,et al.  Female voles discriminate males' over-marks and prefer top-scent males , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  R. Johnston,et al.  Scent counter-marks: specialized mechanisms of perception and response to individual odors in golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). , 1995, Journal of comparative psychology.

[6]  W. G. Holmes.  The ontogeny of littermate preferences in juvenile golden-mantled ground squirrels: effects of rearing and relatedness , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  R. Johnston,et al.  Scent counter marks: selective memory for the top scent by golden hamsters , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  M. Ferkin,et al.  Sources of scent used by prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster, to convey sexual identity to conspecifics , 1994 .

[9]  W. G. Holmes.  The development of littermate preferences in juvenile Belding's ground squirrels , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  R. Johnston,et al.  The information in scent over-marks of golden hamsters , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Carter Cs,et al.  Monogamy and the prairie vole. , 1993, Scientific American.

[12]  J. Hurst.  The priming effects of urine substrate marks on interactions between male house mice, Mus musculus domesticus Schwarz & Schwarz , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  Z. T. Halpin.  Kin recognition: Kin recognition cues of vertebrates , 1991 .

[14]  I. Zucker,et al.  Investigation of conspecific male odours by female prairie voles , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  M. Ferkin,et al.  Mechanisms of sibling recognition in meadow voles , 1990 .

[16]  L. Getz,et al.  Potential for social interaction in a natural population of prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) , 1990 .

[17]  M. Ferkin.  Kin Recognition and Social Behavior in Microtine Rodents , 1990 .

[18]  W. G. Holmes.  Kinship and the Development of Social Preferences , 1988 .

[19]  M. Ferkin,et al.  Odor preference and social behavior in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus: seasonal differences , 1987 .

[20]  J. Hestbeck.  Multiple Regulation States in Populations of Small Mammals: A State-Transition Model , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[21]  C. Carter,et al.  Relationships between social organization and behavioral endocrinology in a monogamous mammal , 1986 .

[22]  Maureen L. Bergondy,et al.  Male hamster sociosexual behaviors: Effects of testosterone and its metabolites , 1985, Physiology & Behavior.

[23]  Joyce E. Hofmann,et al.  Sibling recognition in the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  P. Yahr.  Hormonal Influences on Territorial Marking Behavior , 1983 .

[25]  Susan C. Wilson.  The development of social behaviour between siblings and non-siblings of the voles Microtus ochrogaster and Microtus pennsylvanicus , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  L. M. Gosling,et al.  A Reassessment of the Function of Scent Marking in Territories , 1982 .

[27]  L. Getz,et al.  Incest Taboo between Sibling Microtus ochrogaster , 1981 .

[28]  M. Bekoff.  Mammalian Sibling Interactions , 1981 .

[29]  E. Christiansen.  Urinary marking in wild bank voles, Clethrionomys glareolus in relation to season and sexual status , 1980 .

[30]  J. O. Wolff,et al.  Scent Marking in Taiga Voles, Microtus xanthognathus , 1979 .

[31]  L. Getz,et al.  Suppression of growth and reproduction of microtine rodents by social factors. , 1977, Journal of mammalogy.

[32]  M. Daly.  Behavioral development in three hamster species. , 1976, Developmental psychobiology.

[33]  F. Bronson,et al.  Social Rank in House Mice: Differentiation Revealed by Ultraviolet Visualization of Urinary Marking Patterns , 1973, Science.

[34]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.