Flameout and combustion efficiency of scramjet-powered hypersonic vehicles during ascent

As a hypersonic vehicle travels to high altitudes along an ascent trajectory, the static pressure (p3) in the scramjet combustor will decrease, which can lead to engine flameout and lower combustion efficiency. At low pressures the chemical reactions between the fuel and air become excessively slow. However, during the ascent the flight Mach number is increasing so there is an increase in the stagnation temperature and the static temperature (T3) at the combustor entrance. This tends to prevent flameout and to improve combustion efficiency. To investigate the tradeoff, a reduced-order model called MASIV first was used to compute the static temperature and pressure at the entrance to the combustor (T3, p3) as a function of altitude for a trimmed vehicle. Then the combustion efficiency was computed using the finite-rate chemistry sub-model. To determine if flameout occurs at each altitude, values of (T3, p3) are inserted into an empirical relation that includes the measured value of the critical Damkohler number. Three empirical constants are selected so that the model predictions agree with available measured values combustion efficiencies and flameout limits. The reduced-order model approach provides rapid (but approximate) answers that are useful when thousands of computations are needed for optimization studies or to develop a control algorithm. Results are plotted as three curves on a graph of vehicle altitude versus flight Mach number. The first curve is the vehicle trajectory; the second curve is the combustion efficiency versus altitude and the third curve is the flameout limit. The trajectory curve was optimized to stay near the highest efficiency curves while not intersecting the flameout limit curve. Another optimization study identified the optimum number of wall-port fuel injectors.

[1]  S. Plee,et al.  Characteristic time correlation for lean blowoff of bluff-body-stabilized flames☆ , 1979 .

[2]  Michael C. Romanowski Reduced order unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic models using Karhunen-Loeve eigenmodes , 1996 .

[3]  Santosh J. Shanbhogue,et al.  Lean blowoff of bluff body stabilized flames: Scaling and dynamics , 2009 .

[4]  Ryan P. Starkey,et al.  Critical Design Issues for Airbreathing Hypersonic Waverider Missiles , 2001 .

[5]  Jeffrey P. Thomas,et al.  Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Technique for Transonic Unsteady Aerodynamic Flows , 2000 .

[6]  Ernest F. Hasselbrink,et al.  Transverse jets and jet flames. Part 2. Velocity and OH field imaging , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  Muruhan Rathinam,et al.  A New Look at Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2003, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[8]  David J. Lucia,et al.  Aeroelastic System Development Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and Volterra Theory , 2003 .

[9]  Taehyoun Kim,et al.  Frequency-Domain Karhunen -Loeve Method and Its Application to Linear Dynamic Systems , 1998 .

[10]  David B. Doman,et al.  Nonlinear Longitudinal Dynamical Model of an Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicle , 2007 .

[11]  Chris L. Pettit,et al.  Prediction of Nonlinear Panel Response Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2001 .

[12]  Mitsuhiro Tsue,et al.  CONTROL OF FLAME-HOLDING IN SUPERSONIC AIRFLOW BY SECONDARY AIR INJECTION , 1996 .

[13]  David K. Schmidt,et al.  Analytical aeropropulsive-aeroelastic hypersonic-vehicle model with dynamic analysis , 1994 .

[14]  Eli Livne,et al.  CFD-Based Aerodynamic Approximation Concepts Optimization of a Two-Dimensional Scramjet Vehicle , 1995 .

[15]  D. Banerjee,et al.  Theoretical Analysis on Flame Stabilization by a Bluff-Body , 1977 .

[16]  A. H. Lefebvre,et al.  Flame stabilization in high-velocity heterogeneous fuel-air mixtures , 1992 .

[17]  Hideaki Kobayashi,et al.  Flame Stabilization Characteristics of Strut Divided into Two Parts in Supersonic Airflow , 1995 .

[18]  Ryan P. Starkey,et al.  Quasi-One-Dimensional High-Speed Engine Model with Finite-Rate Chemistry , 2001 .

[19]  Matthew Fotia,et al.  Reduced-Order Modeling of Two-Dimensional Supersonic Flows with Applications to Scramjet Inlets , 2010 .

[20]  Campbell D. Carter,et al.  Stability limits of cavity-stabilized flames in supersonic flow , 2005 .

[21]  J. Lumley,et al.  A model for large-scale structures in turbulent shear flows , 1995, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[22]  Campbell D. Carter,et al.  Characteristics of Cavity-Stabilized Flames in a Supersonic Flow , 2005 .

[23]  Taehyoun Kim,et al.  Aeroelastic Model Reduction for Affordable Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Flutter Analysis , 2005 .

[24]  Ionel M. Navon,et al.  A reduced‐order approach to four‐dimensional variational data assimilation using proper orthogonal decomposition , 2007 .

[25]  Sean M. Torrez,et al.  New Method for Computing Performance of Choked Reacting Flows and Ram-to-Scram Transition , 2013 .

[26]  Tarun Mathur,et al.  Fundamental Studies of Cavity-Based Flameholder Concepts for Supersonic Combustors , 2001 .

[27]  Mark J. Lewis,et al.  Design tradeoffs on scramjet engine integrated hypersonic waverider vehicles , 1993 .

[28]  Kevin G. Bowcutt,et al.  Multidisciplinary Optimization of Airbreathing Hypersonic Vehicles , 2001 .

[29]  Christopher Tarpley,et al.  Stability derivatives for a hypersonic caret-wing waverider , 1995 .

[30]  Wr Graham,et al.  Active flow control using a reduced order model and optimum control , 1996 .

[31]  Sean M. Torrez,et al.  Rapid Analysis of Scramjet and Linear Plug Nozzles , 2012 .

[32]  Matthew Fotia,et al.  Reduced-order modeling of turbulent reacting flows with application to ramjets and scramjets , 2011 .

[33]  David B. Doman,et al.  Control-Oriented Modeling of an Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicle , 2007 .

[34]  James F. Driscoll,et al.  Correlation and Analysis of Blowout Limits of Flames in High-Speed Airflows , 2005 .

[35]  Peng Zhang,et al.  Blowout Limits of Cavity-Stabilized Flame of Supercritical Kerosene in Supersonic Combustors , 2014 .

[36]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Three-Dimensional Transonic Aeroelasticity Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition-Based Reduced-Order Models , 2001 .

[37]  Campbell D. Carter,et al.  Mixing and combustion studies using cavity-based flameholders in a supersonic flow , 2004 .

[38]  P. Holmes,et al.  The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in the Analysis of Turbulent Flows , 1993 .

[39]  Michael A. Bolender,et al.  Minimum-Fuel Ascent of a Hypersonic Vehicle Using Surrogate Optimization , 2014 .