BACKGROUND
The use of ultrasound during invasive bedside procedures is quickly becoming the standard of care. Ultrasound machine placement during procedures often requires the practitioner to turn their head during the procedure to view the screen. Such turning has been implicated in unintentional hand movements in novices. Google Glass is a head-mounted computer with a specialized screen capable of projecting images and video into the view of the wearer. Such technology may help decrease unintentional hand movements.
OBJECTIVE
Our aim was to evaluate whether or not medical practitioners at various levels of training could use Google Glass to perform an ultrasound-guided procedure, and to explore potential advantages of this technology.
METHODS
Forty participants of varying training levels were randomized into two groups. One group used Google Glass to perform an ultrasound-guided central line. The other group used traditional ultrasound during the procedure. Video recordings of eye and hand movements were analyzed.
RESULTS
All participants from both groups were able to complete the procedure without difficulty. Google Glass wearers took longer to perform the procedure at all training levels (medical student year 1 [MS1]: 193 s vs. 77 s, p > 0.5; MS4: 197s vs. 91s, p ≤ 0.05; postgraduate year 1 [PGY1]: 288s vs. 125 s, p > 0.5; PGY3: 151 s vs. 52 s, p ≤ 0.05), and required more needle redirections (MS1: 4.4 vs. 2.0, p > 0.5; MS4: 4.8 vs. 2.8, p > 0.5; PGY1: 4.4 vs. 2.8, p > 0.5; PGY3: 2.0 vs. 1.0, p > 0.5).
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, it was possible to perform ultrasound-guided procedures with Google Glass. Google Glass wearers, on average, took longer to gain access, and had more needle redirections, but less head movements were noted.
[1]
D. Shende,et al.
Internal jugular vein cannulation: A comparison of three techniques
,
2013,
Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology.
[2]
C. Colwell.
An Introduction to Clinical Emergency Medicine, 2nd ed.
,
2013
.
[3]
M. Kollef,et al.
Risk factors for acute adverse events during ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in the emergency department.
,
2010,
Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
[4]
Teresa S. Wu,et al.
Basic ultrasound-guided procedures.
,
2014,
Critical care clinics.
[5]
Randomized, controlled clinical trial of point-of-care limited ultrasonography assistance of central venous cannulation: The third Sonography Outcomes Assessment Program (SOAP-3) trial
,
2006
.
[6]
K. A. Ericsson,et al.
Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview.
,
2008,
Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
[7]
Swaminatha V. Mahadevan,et al.
An Introduction to Clinical Emergency Medicine: Contributors
,
2012
.
[8]
Eric De Groot,et al.
Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients
,
2006,
Critical care.
[9]
J. F. Soechting,et al.
Oculocentric frames of reference for limb movement.
,
2002,
Archives italiennes de biologie.
[10]
Vicki E Noble,et al.
Ultrasound-guided procedures in the emergency department-diagnostic and therapeutic asset.
,
2013,
Emergency medicine clinics of North America.
[11]
Andreas Lymberis.
Wearable smart systems: From technologies to integrated systems
,
2011,
2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.