A high‐throughput all‐optical laser‐scanning imaging flow cytometer with biomolecular specificity and subcellular resolution

Image-based cellular assay advances approaches to dissect complex cellular characteristics through direct visualization of cellular functional structures. However, available technologies face a common challenge, especially when it comes to the unmet need for unraveling population heterogeneity at single-cell precision: higher imaging resolution (and thus content) comes at the expense of lower throughput, or vice versa. To overcome this challenge, a new type of imaging flow cytometer based upon an all-optical ultrafast laser-scanning imaging technique, called free-space angular-chirp-enhanced delay (FACED) is reported. It enables an imaging throughput (>20 000 cells s-1 ) 1 to 2 orders of magnitude higher than the camera-based imaging flow cytometers. It also has 2 critical advantages over optical time-stretch imaging flow cytometry, which achieves a similar throughput: (1) it is widely compatible to the repertoire of biochemical contrast agents, favoring biomolecular-specific cellular assay and (2) it enables high-throughput visualization of functional morphology of individual cells with subcellular resolution. These capabilities enable multiparametric single-cell image analysis which reveals cellular heterogeneity, for example, in the cell-death processes demonstrated in this work-the information generally masked in non-imaging flow cytometry. Therefore, this platform empowers not only efficient large-scale single-cell measurements, but also detailed mechanistic analysis of complex cellular processes.

[1]  Qiyin Fang,et al.  CMOS Image Sensors for High Speed Applications , 2009, Sensors.

[2]  P. Jolly,et al.  Morphological evidence of apoptosis and the prevalence of apoptotic versus mitotic cells in the membrana granulosa of ovarian follicles during spontaneous and induced atresia in ewes. , 1997, Biology of reproduction.

[3]  Yo Sup Moon,et al.  Quantitative Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Effusions by Single-Cell Mechanophenotyping , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[4]  Cheng Lei,et al.  Optical time-stretch imaging: Principles and applications , 2016 .

[5]  U. Keyser,et al.  Real-time deformability cytometry: on-the-fly cell mechanical phenotyping , 2015, Nature Methods.

[6]  G. Cohen,et al.  An ICE‐like protease is a common mediator of apoptosis induced by diverse stimuli in human monocytic THP.1 cells , 1995, FEBS letters.

[7]  Mehmet Toner,et al.  Inertial focusing in microfluidics. , 2014, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[8]  Natasha S. Barteneva,et al.  Imaging Flow Cytometry , 2016, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[9]  Bahram Jalali,et al.  High-throughput single-microparticle imaging flow analyzer , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .

[11]  D. Green,et al.  A Matter of Life and Death , 2008, Science.

[12]  Junying Yuan,et al.  Autophagy in cell death: an innocent convict? , 2005, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[13]  Hope T. Beier,et al.  Experimental Comparison of the High-Speed Imaging Performance of an EM-CCD and sCMOS Camera in a Dynamic Live-Cell Imaging Test Case , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  K. Yeow,et al.  Cellular imaging in drug discovery , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[15]  Edmund Y. Lam,et al.  Asymmetric-detection time-stretch optical microscopy (ATOM) for ultrafast high-contrast cellular imaging in flow , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Andy K. S. Lau,et al.  Ultrafast laser-scanning time-stretch imaging at visible wavelengths , 2016, Light: Science & Applications.

[17]  Cheng Lei,et al.  High‐throughput, label‐free, single‐cell, microalgal lipid screening by machine‐learning‐equipped optofluidic time‐stretch quantitative phase microscopy , 2017, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[18]  Jonathan M Irish,et al.  High-dimensional single-cell cancer biology. , 2014, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[19]  Jean Qiu,et al.  A novel image-based cytometry method for autophagy detection in living cells , 2012, Autophagy.

[20]  Bahram Jalali,et al.  Performance of serial time-encoded amplified microscopy , 2010, CLEO/QELS: 2010 Laser Science to Photonic Applications.

[21]  K. Öllinger,et al.  Lysosomal membrane permeabilization during apoptosis ‐ involvement of Bax? , 2005, International journal of experimental pathology.

[22]  B. Jalali,et al.  Serial time-encoded amplified imaging for real-time observation of fast dynamic phenomena , 2009, Nature.

[23]  Anson H L Tang,et al.  Multi-MHz laser-scanning single-cell fluorescence microscopy by spatiotemporally encoded virtual source array. , 2017, Biomedical optics express.

[24]  Ata Mahjoubfar,et al.  Deep Learning in Label-free Cell Classification , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[25]  S. van de Linde,et al.  Light-induced cell damage in live-cell super-resolution microscopy , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[26]  N. Mizushima,et al.  Methods in Mammalian Autophagy Research , 2010, Cell.

[27]  Guillermo Repetto,et al.  Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[28]  B. Jalali,et al.  Time stretch and its applications , 2017, Nature Photonics.

[29]  Jürgen Popp,et al.  Making a big thing of a small cell--recent advances in single cell analysis. , 2014, The Analyst.

[30]  Antoni Ribas,et al.  Single-cell analysis tools for drug discovery and development , 2015, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[31]  Gabriel P López,et al.  Microfluidic cell sorting: a review of the advances in the separation of cells from debulking to rare cell isolation. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[32]  Lassi Paavolainen,et al.  Data-analysis strategies for image-based cell profiling , 2017, Nature Methods.

[33]  Jahan B. Ghasemi,et al.  Spectrophotometric and thermodynamic study on the dimerization equilibrium of ionic dyes in water by chemometrics method. , 2006, Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy.

[34]  William E. Ortyn,et al.  Cellular image analysis and imaging by flow cytometry. , 2007, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[35]  R. Lockshin,et al.  Cell death in development: shaping the embryo , 2006, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[36]  Yu Oishi,et al.  Sequentially timed all-optical mapping photography (STAMP) , 2014, Nature Photonics.

[37]  W. Bursch,et al.  Autophagic and apoptotic types of programmed cell death exhibit different fates of cytoskeletal filaments. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[38]  Andrew Evans,et al.  Digital imaging in pathology: whole-slide imaging and beyond. , 2013, Annual review of pathology.

[39]  Ho Cheung Shum,et al.  Optofluidic time-stretch imaging - an emerging tool for high-throughput imaging flow cytometry. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[40]  Edmund Y. Lam,et al.  All-passive pixel super-resolution of time-stretch imaging , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[41]  Kutay D Atabay,et al.  Single-cell analysis reveals transcriptional heterogeneity of neural progenitors in human cortex , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  Chiye Li,et al.  Single-shot compressed ultrafast photography at one hundred billion frames per second , 2014, Nature.

[43]  Philipp S. Hoppe,et al.  Single-cell technologies sharpen up mammalian stem cell research , 2014, Nature Cell Biology.