Imagine all the people: how the brain creates and uses personality models to predict behavior.

The behaviors of other people are often central to envisioning the future. The ability to accurately predict the thoughts and actions of others is essential for successful social interactions, with far-reaching consequences. Despite its importance, little is known about how the brain represents people in order to predict behavior. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging study, participants learned the unique personality of 4 protagonists and imagined how each would behave in different scenarios. The protagonists' personalities were composed of 2 traits: Agreeableness and Extraversion. Which protagonist was being imagined was accurately inferred based solely on activity patterns in the medial prefrontal cortex using multivariate pattern classification, providing novel evidence that brain activity can reveal whom someone is thinking about. Lateral temporal and posterior cingulate cortex discriminated between different degrees of agreeableness and extraversion, respectively. Functional connectivity analysis confirmed that regions associated with trait-processing and individual identities were functionally coupled. Activity during the imagination task, and revealed by functional connectivity, was consistent with the default network. Our results suggest that distinct regions code for personality traits, and that the brain combines these traits to represent individuals. The brain then uses this "personality model" to predict the behavior of others in novel situations.

[1]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[2]  M. Vandekerckhove,et al.  Distinct recruitment of temporo-parietal junction and medial prefrontal cortex in behavior understanding and trait identification , 2012, Social Neuroscience.

[3]  M. Corballis,et al.  The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? , 2007, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[4]  Jordan B Peterson,et al.  Unifying the aspects of the Big Five, the interpersonal circumplex, and trait affiliation. , 2013, Journal of personality.

[5]  Donald T. Stuss,et al.  Common and Unique Neural Correlates of Autobiographical Memory and Theory of Mind , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Information-based functional brain mapping. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  J. Haynes Brain Reading: Decoding Mental States From Brain Activity In Humans , 2011 .

[8]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Neuroinformatics Original Research Article Pymvpa: a Unifying Approach to the Analysis of Neuroscientifi C Data , 2022 .

[9]  C. Frith,et al.  Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  Readers' Trait-Based Models of Characters in Narrative Comprehension☆ , 2001 .

[11]  P. E. Morris,et al.  Practical aspects of memory , 1980 .

[12]  R. N. Spreng,et al.  I remember you: A role for memory in social cognition and the functional neuroanatomy of their interaction , 2012, Brain Research.

[13]  D. Hassabis,et al.  Patients with hippocampal amnesia cannot imagine new experiences , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  P. Costa,et al.  The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the five-factor model. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Searching scale space for activation in PET images , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[16]  D. Hassabis,et al.  Deconstructing episodic memory with construction , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  D. Hassabis,et al.  Decoding Neuronal Ensembles in the Human Hippocampus , 2009, Current Biology.

[19]  Peter Carruthers,et al.  Theories of theories of mind: Frontmatter , 1996 .

[20]  Simon Baron-Cohen,et al.  Reduced functional connectivity within and between ‘social’ resting state networks in autism spectrum conditions , 2012, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[21]  J. Uleman,et al.  Spontaneous inferences, implicit impressions, and implicit theories. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  R. Buckner,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.11 No.2 Self-projection and the brain , 2022 .

[23]  Ruth Seurinck,et al.  Spontaneous and intentional trait inferences recruit a common mentalizing network to a different degree: Spontaneous inferences activate only its core areas , 2011, Social neuroscience.

[24]  R. Nathan Spreng,et al.  Patterns of Brain Activity Supporting Autobiographical Memory, Prospection, and Theory of Mind, and Their Relationship to the Default Mode Network , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  A. Caspi,et al.  The Power of Personality: The Comparative Validity of Personality Traits, Socioeconomic Status, and Cognitive Ability for Predicting Important Life Outcomes , 2007, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[26]  Colin G. DeYoung,et al.  Personality Neuroscience and the Biology of Traits , 2010 .

[27]  M. Brass,et al.  Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  D. Schacter Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory. , 2012, The American psychologist.

[29]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Harnessing the imagination. Mental simulation, self-regulation, and coping. , 1998, The American psychologist.

[30]  D. Schacter,et al.  Episodic Simulation of Future Events , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Medial prefrontal dissociations during processing of trait diagnostic and nondiagnostic person information. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[32]  D. Hassabis,et al.  Using Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of Episodic Memory , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  D. Ingvar “Hyperfrontal” distribution of the cerebral grey matter flow in resting wakefulness; on the functional anatomy of the conscious state , 1979, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[34]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning , 1978 .

[35]  R. Nathan Spreng,et al.  The Common Neural Basis of Autobiographical Memory, Prospection, Navigation, Theory of Mind, and the Default Mode: A Quantitative Meta-analysis , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Jordan B Peterson,et al.  Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  D. Schacter,et al.  Remembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[38]  R. N. Spreng,et al.  The Future of Memory: Remembering, Imagining, and the Brain , 2012, Neuron.

[39]  Bernadette Park A Method for Studying the Development of Impressions of Real People , 1986 .

[40]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  Anthony Randal McIntosh,et al.  Partial Least Squares (PLS) methods for neuroimaging: A tutorial and review , 2011, NeuroImage.

[42]  Keith Oatley,et al.  Joint plans, emotions, and relationships: A diary study of errors , 2006 .

[43]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A Study of Analysis Parameters That Influence the Sensitivity of Event-Related fMRI Analyses , 2000, NeuroImage.

[44]  R. Mar The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[45]  Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna,et al.  The Brain’s Default Network and Its Adaptive Role in Internal Mentation , 2012, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[46]  R. Buckner,et al.  Functional-Anatomic Fractionation of the Brain's Default Network , 2010, Neuron.

[47]  Peter Carruthers,et al.  Theories of theories of mind: What is acquired – theory-theory versus simulation-theory , 1996 .

[48]  D. Schacter,et al.  Constructive episodic simulation of the future and the past: Distinct subsystems of a core brain network mediate imagining and remembering , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  P. Borkenau,et al.  Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: A tutorial overview , 2009, NeuroImage.

[51]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Aggregating social behavior into person models: perceiver-induced consistency. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .

[53]  Simine Vazire,et al.  Knowing me, knowing you: the accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other-ratings of daily behavior. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[55]  Patrick Gallagher,et al.  The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[56]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Theories of Theories of Mind , 1996 .

[57]  J. Haxby,et al.  The representation of self and person knowledge in the medial prefrontal cortex. , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[58]  A. McIntosh,et al.  Mapping cognition to the brain through neural interactions. , 1999, Memory.

[59]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  Attributions on the brain: Neuro-imaging dispositional inferences, beyond theory of mind , 2005, NeuroImage.