Intravascular ultrasound as a clinical adjunct for carotid plaque characterization.

OBJECTIVE Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH IVUS) is valuable for estimating minimal lumen diameter and plaque characterization. The clinical use of IVUS in carotid intervention is not well characterized. We aim to evaluate the role of IVUS in carotid plaque characterization and determine whether it could be predictive of procedure-related microemboli. METHODS From July 2010, patients with severe carotid stenosis who underwent elective carotid stenting procedures were prospectively enrolled. IVUS evaluation was performed before stent placement. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative images were recorded. Comparison of pre- and postoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images was used to identify the number of procedure-related microemboli. IVUS-derived minimal lumen diameter and vessel wall plaque characteristics were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to search for associations between IVUS-derived VH data and incidence of microemboli. RESULTS A total of 38 high-risk patients receiving carotid stenting were enrolled. Among them, 25 patients had type I aortic arches and 17 of the patients were symptomatic (preoperative stroke or transient ischemic attack). VH IVUS data did not show strong associations with microemboli, however, a trend was found between the area of fibrous tissue and median or more incidence of microemboli (P = .099). IVUS-defined vessel diameter maximum was associated with median or more incidence of microemboli (P = .042). In addition, median or more incidence of microemboli showed trends with proximal common carotid artery calcification (P = .056) and with being over the age of 80 (P = .06). Contralateral carotid occlusion or high-grade stenosis was associated with postoperative contralateral microemboli (P = .036). CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate that periprocedural carotid IVUS is clinically feasible. VH IVUS may be helpful in better understanding plaque morphology and determining optimal stent placement. However, its use in predicting microembolization remains limited.

[1]  W. Jordan,et al.  Microemboli Detected by Transcranial Doppler Monitoring in Patients during Carotid Angioplasty Versus Carotid Endarterectomy , 1999, Cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  A. Roceanu,et al.  Microemboli detection in patients with carotid artery stenting — A potential marker for future cognitive impairment? , 2013, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[3]  J. Haukoos,et al.  Postprocedural microembolic events following carotid surgery and carotid angioplasty and stenting. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  A. López-Rueda,et al.  Carotid Plaque Characterization by Virtual Histology Intravascular Ultrasound Related to the Timing of Carotid Intervention , 2012, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[5]  T. Kawamoto,et al.  The relationship between coronary plaque characteristics and small embolic particles during coronary stent implantation. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  L. Bozzao,et al.  Embolism to the Brain During Carotid Stenting and Surgery , 2007, Acta chirurgica Belgica.

[7]  A R Forrest,et al.  Quality control. , 1978, British medical journal.

[8]  A. W. Reid,et al.  Virtual Histology Intravascular Ultrasound in Carotid Interventions , 2007, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[9]  Raimund Erbel,et al.  Impact of atherosclerotic plaque composition on coronary microembolization during percutaneous coronary interventions , 2008, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[10]  T. Iwama,et al.  Prediction of Silent Ischemic Lesions after Carotid Artery Stenting Using Virtual Histology Intravascular Ultrasound , 2011, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[11]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[12]  D. Clark,et al.  Safety and utility of intravascular ultrasound-guided carotid artery stenting. , 2004, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[13]  D. Holmes,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound identification of intraluminal embolic plaque material during carotid angioplasty with stenting , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[14]  J. Haukoos,et al.  Risk factors for developing postprocedural microemboli following carotid interventions. , 2007, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[15]  G. Wheatley,et al.  Virtual Histology Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease: The Carotid Artery Plaque Virtual Histology Evaluation (CAPITAL) Study , 2007, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[16]  D. Bandyk,et al.  Use of intravascular ultrasound as a "Quality Control" technique during carotid stent-angioplasty: are there risks to its use? , 2009, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  Wei Zhou,et al.  Prospective neurocognitive evaluation of patients undergoing carotid interventions. , 2012, Journal of vascular surgery.

[18]  Wei Zhou,et al.  Contralateral microemboli following carotid artery stenting in patients with a contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion. , 2013, Journal of vascular surgery.

[19]  H. Jäger,et al.  New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) , 2010, Lancet Neurology.

[20]  E. Rosero,et al.  Atherosclerotic plaque composition assessed by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and cerebral embolization after carotid stenting. , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[21]  Pramodita Sharma 2012 , 2013, Les 25 ans de l’OMC: Une rétrospective en photos.

[22]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2013, Circulation.

[23]  Seung‐Jung Park,et al.  A three-vessel virtual histology intravascular ultrasound analysis of frequency and distribution of thin-cap fibroatheromas in patients with acute coronary syndrome or stable angina pectoris. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  A. Dardik,et al.  Increased aortic arch calcification in patients older than 75 years: implications for carotid artery stenting in elderly patients. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[25]  W. Tracz,et al.  Carotid Artery Stenting with Patient- and Lesion-Tailored Selection of the Neuroprotection System and Stent Type: Early and 5-Year Results from a Prospective Academic Registry of 535 Consecutive Procedures (TARGET-CAS) , 2008, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[26]  A. Colombo,et al.  Impact of Diabetes, Patient Age, and Gender on the 30-Day Incidence of Stroke and Death in Patients Undergoing Carotid Artery Stenting with Embolus Protection: A Post-Hoc Subanalysis of a Prospective Multicenter Registry , 2007, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.