A PDE Sensitivity Equation Method for Optimal Aerodynamic Design

The use of gradient-based optimization algorithms in inverse design is well established as a practical approach to aerodynamic design. A typical procedure uses a simulation scheme to evaluate the objective function (from the approximate states) and its gradient, then passes this information to an optimization algorithm. Once the simulation scheme (CFD flow solver) has been selected and used to provide approximate function evaluations, there are several possible approaches to the problem of computing gradients. One popular method is to differentiate the simulation scheme and compute design sensitivities that are then used to obtain gradients. Although this black-box approach has many advantages in shape optimization problems, one must compute mesh sensitivities in order to compute the design sensitivity. In this paper, we present an alternative approach using the PDE sensitivity equation to develop algorithms for computing gradients. This approach has the advantage that mesh sensitivities need not be computed. Moreover, when it is possible to use the CFD scheme for both the forward problem and the sensitivity equation, then there are computational advantages. An apparent disadvantage of this approach is that it does not always produce consistent derivatives. However, for a proper combination of discretization schemes, one can showasymptotic consistencyunder mesh refinement, which is often sufficient to guarantee convergence of the optimal design algorithm. In particular, we show that when asymptotically consistent schemes are combined with a trust-region optimization algorithm, the resulting optimal design method converges. We denote this approach as thesensitivity equation method.The sensitivity equation method is presented, convergence results are given, and the approach is illustrated on two optimal design problems involving shocks.

[1]  R. Grimshaw Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 1956, Nature.

[2]  On the integral properties of separated laminar boundary layers , 1973 .

[3]  O. Pironneau On optimum profiles in Stokes flow , 1973, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  O. Pironneau On optimum design in fluid mechanics , 1974 .

[5]  R. F. Warming,et al.  An implicit finite-difference algorithm for hyperbolic systems in conservation-law form. [application to Eulerian gasdynamic equations , 1976 .

[6]  David M. author-Gay Computing Optimal Locally Constrained Steps , 1981 .

[7]  John E. Dennis,et al.  An Adaptive Nonlinear Least-Squares Algorithm , 1977, TOMS.

[8]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations , 1983, Prentice Hall series in computational mathematics.

[9]  Joe F. Thompson,et al.  Numerical grid generation: Foundations and applications , 1985 .

[10]  Edward J. Haug,et al.  Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems , 1986 .

[11]  J. R. Sirbaugh,et al.  PARC Code: Theory and Usage , 1987 .

[12]  A. Griewank The local convergence of Broyden-like methods on Lipschitzian problems in Hilbert spaces , 1987 .

[13]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic design via control theory , 1988, J. Sci. Comput..

[14]  Richard G. Carter Numerical optimization in Hilbert space using inexact function and gradient evaluations , 1989 .

[15]  Gerald Farin,et al.  Curves and surfaces for computer aided geometric design , 1990 .

[16]  David H Huddleston,et al.  Development of a Free-Jet Forebody Simulator Design Optimization Method , 1990 .

[17]  V. Korivi,et al.  Sensitivity analysis, approximate analysis, and design optimization for internal and external viscous flows , 1991 .

[18]  V. Korivi,et al.  A methodology for determining aerodynamic sensitivity derivatives with respect to variation of geometric shape , 1991 .

[19]  R. Carter On the global convergence of trust region algorithms using inexact gradient information , 1991 .

[20]  G. R. Shubin,et al.  A comparison of optimization-based approaches for a model computational aerodynamics design problem , 1992 .

[21]  Bernard Grossman,et al.  Design optimization of transonic airfoils , 1993 .

[22]  Eugene M. Cliff,et al.  Sensitivity Calculations for a 2D, Inviscid, Supersonic Forebody Problem , 1993 .

[23]  Aditi Chattopadhyay,et al.  A discrete semi-analytical procedure for aerodynamic sensitivity analysis including grid sensitivity , 1994 .

[24]  Eugene M. Cliff,et al.  An optimal control formulation for a flow matching problem , 1994 .

[25]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Control theory based airfoil design using the Euler equations , 1994 .

[26]  J. Borggaard The sensitivity equation method for optimal design , 1994 .

[27]  Jacques Periaux,et al.  Numerical simulation and optimal shape for viscous flow by a fictitious domain method , 1995 .

[28]  J. Burkardt,et al.  Sensitivity analyses and computational shape optimization for incompressible flows , 1995 .

[29]  Jeff Borggaard,et al.  ON THE PRESENCE OF SHOCKS IN DOMAIN OPTIMIZATION OF EULER FLOWS , 1995 .

[30]  John A. Burns,et al.  Computational approach to sensor/actuator location for feedback control of fluid flow systems , 1995, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[31]  R. Haftka,et al.  Sensitivity algorithms for an inverse design problem involving a shock wave , 1994 .

[32]  Aditi Chattopadhyay,et al.  A discrete semianalytical procedure for aerodynamic sensitivity analysis including grid sensitivity , 1996 .

[33]  Gerald E. Farin,et al.  Curves and surfaces for computer-aided geometric design - a practical guide, 4th Edition , 1997, Computer science and scientific computing.

[34]  Eric F Darve,et al.  Author ' s personal copy A hybrid method for the parallel computation of Green ’ s functions , 2009 .