We Are All Theorists of Technology Now: A Relational Perspective on Emerging Technology and Organizing

Technologies are changing at a rapid pace and in unpredictable ways. The scale of their impact is also far-reaching. Technologies such as artificial intelligence, data analytics, robotics, digital platforms, social media, blockchain, and 3-D printing affect many parts of the organization simultaneously, enabling new interdependencies within and between units and with actors that many organizations have typically considered to be outside their boundaries. Consequently, today’s emerging technologies have the potential to fundamentally shape all aspects of organizing. This article introduces the special issue “Emerging Technologies and Organizing.” We treat these new technologies as “emerging” because their uses and effects are still varied and have yet to stabilize around a recognizable set of patterns and because the technologies themselves are, by design, always changing and adapting. To theorize the relationship between emerging technologies and organizing, we draw on relational thinking in philosophy and sociology to develop a relational perspective on emerging technologies. Our goal in doing so is to create a new way for organizational scholars to incorporate the ever-increasing role of technology in their theorizing of key organizational processes and phenomena. By developing a relational perspective that treats emerging technologies not as stable entities, but as a set of evolving relations, we provide a novel way for organizational scholars to account for the role of technology in their topics of interest. We sketch the outlines of this relational perspective on emerging technologies and discuss the implications it has for what organizational scholars study and how we study it.

[1]  M. Huysman,et al.  In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man Is King: Knowledge Brokerage in the Age of Learning Algorithms , 2021, Organization Science.

[2]  J. Recker,et al.  From Lock-In to Transformation: A Path-Centric Theory of Emerging Technology and Organizing , 2021, Organization Science.

[3]  Hila Lifshitz-Assaf,et al.  To engage or not to engage with AI for critical judgments: How professionals deal with opacity when using AI for medical diagnosis , 2021, Organization Science.

[4]  David J. Collis,et al.  Corporate Strategy and the Theory of the Firm in the Digital Age , 2021, Journal of Management Studies.

[5]  H. Rahman The Invisible Cage: Workers’ Reactivity to Opaque Algorithmic Evaluations , 2021, Administrative Science Quarterly.

[6]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Algorithm Supported Induction for Building Theory: How Can We Use Prediction Models to Theorize? , 2020 .

[7]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Behavioral Visibility: A new paradigm for organization studies in the age of digitization, digitalization, and datafication , 2020, Organization Studies.

[8]  Carlos Rodríguez-Lluesma,et al.  The digital transformation of work: A relational view , 2020, Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility.

[9]  Vivianna Fang He,et al.  Resolving Governance Disputes in Communities: A Study of Software License Decisions , 2020 .

[10]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  How Open Crowds Self-Organize , 2020 .

[11]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Setting the stage for corporate headquarters: a technological explanation for the rise of modern industrial corporations , 2019, Journal of Organization Design.

[12]  Gerald M Kane The Technology Fallacy , 2019, Research-Technology Management.

[13]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  The Coevolution of Objects and Boundaries over Time: Materiality, Affordances, and Boundary Salience , 2019, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: The Ambiguous Labor Market Impact of Automating Prediction , 2019, Journal of Economic Perspectives.

[15]  G. Krogh Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: New Opportunities for Phenomenon-Based Theorizing , 2018, Academy of Management Discoveries.

[16]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Step by step: Capturing the dynamics of work team process through relational event sequences , 2018 .

[17]  Stella Pachidi,et al.  Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm , 2018, Inf. Organ..

[18]  D. Lazer,et al.  Data ex Machina: Introduction to Big Data , 2017 .

[19]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Special Section Introduction - Online Community as Space for Knowledge Flows , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  M. Feldman,et al.  Beyond Routines as Things: Introduction to the Special Issue on Routine Dynamics , 2016, Organ. Sci..

[21]  Patrick S. Cohendet,et al.  Always Playable: Recombining Routines for Creative Efficiency at Ubisoft Montreal's Video Game Studio , 2016, Organ. Sci..

[22]  Curtis K. Chan,et al.  Three Lenses on Occupations and Professions in Organizations: Becoming, Doing, and Relating , 2016 .

[23]  R. Garud,et al.  The Disruptor’s Dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. Television Ecosystem , 2015 .

[24]  Karen E. C. Levy,et al.  The Contexts of Control: Information, Power, and Truck-Driving Work , 2015, Inf. Soc..

[25]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  What Happens When Evaluation Goes Online? Exploring Apparatuses of Valuation in the Travel Sector , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[26]  J. Kallinikos Form, function and matter: crossing the border of materiality , 2012 .

[27]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Reconfiguring Boundary Relations: Robotic Innovations in Pharmacy Work , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[28]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies , 2011, MIS Q..

[29]  Alistair Mutch,et al.  Technology, Organization, and Structure - A Morphogenetic Approach , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Jochen Runde,et al.  On the Identity of Technological Objects and User Innovations in Function , 2009 .

[31]  Carter T. Butts,et al.  4. A Relational Event Framework for Social Action , 2008 .

[32]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Activating the Informational Capabilities of Information Technology for Organizational Change , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[33]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[34]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  The Promise of Research on Open Source Software , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[35]  W. Nord,et al.  Book Review Essay: Understanding Bourdieu'S Contribution To Organization And Management Studies , 2005 .

[36]  Benyamin Lichtenstein,et al.  Relationality in Organizational Research: Exploring The Space Between , 2000 .

[37]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[38]  Mustafa Emirbayer Manifesto for a Relational Sociology1 , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[39]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  A. Grandori,et al.  Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms , 1995 .

[41]  S. Barley The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. , 1990, Administrative science quarterly.

[42]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[43]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[44]  Leo F. Schnore,et al.  Social Morphology and Human Ecology , 1958, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  F. Cassidy Apple-Picking Terms from Wisconsin , 1943 .

[46]  Georg Simmel,et al.  The Sociology of Secrecy and of Secret Societies , 1906, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[48]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[49]  Charles Tilly,et al.  Durable Inequality , 2004 .

[50]  Jan Venselaar,et al.  DESIGN RULES , 1999 .

[51]  L. Henderson On the Social System , 1993 .

[52]  M. Callon The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle , 1986 .