Open government data and the private sector: An empirical view on business models and value creation

Abstract The release of government data in an open format is broadly expected to generate innovation and economic value. However, despite the emerging public notoriety of this issue, literature is still scarce regarding the commercial application of open government data. The main goal of this study is to understand how firms use open government data to create value. More specifically, we aim to identify what types of use are currently in place and which industries are more prominent in exploiting open government data. Building on the analysis of a dataset of 178 firms that use open government data across various industries in the U.S. we find twelve different atomic models. Additionally, our findings suggest that the way in which open government is used to create value is contingent to the firms' activities. Supported by robust empirical data, we anticipate that our research produces practical insights to entrepreneurs as well as firm managers in deriving value from public datasets, and equip government officials with relevant evidence for advocacy and policy-making.

[1]  Alexander Osterwalder,et al.  The business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach , 2004 .

[2]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[3]  A. M. Evans,et al.  Open Government Initiatives: Challenges of Citizen Participation , 2013 .

[4]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[5]  Susan Lambert,et al.  A Business Model Research Schema , 2006, Bled eConference.

[6]  Bastiaan van Loenen,et al.  Brave New Open Data World? , 2012, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[7]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Special Issue on Innovation through Open Data - A Review of the State-of-the-Art and an Emerging Research Agenda: Guest Editors' Introduction , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[8]  Maxat Kassen.  Globalization of e-government: open government as a global agenda; benefits, limitations and ways forward , 2014 .

[9]  Amanda Meng.  Investigating the Roots of Open Data’s Social Impact , 2014 .

[10]  Peter Weill,et al.  Place to Space: Migrating to Ebusiness Models , 2001 .

[11]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[12]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Big data, open government and e-government: Issues, policies and recommendations , 2014, Inf. Polity.

[13]  Nancy L Kondracki,et al.  Content analysis: review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. , 2002, Journal of nutrition education and behavior.

[14]  J. Gray.  Towards a Genealogy of Open Data , 2014 .

[15]  Sébastien Martin,et al.  How Open Data Are Turned into Services? , 2014, IESS.

[16]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  Data-Driven Innovation through Open Government Data , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[17]  Erik Borglund,et al.  Open data?: Data, information, document or record? , 2014 .

[18]  B. Lundvall,et al.  The Learning Economy , 1994 .

[19]  D. Flint,et al.  Customer Value Anticipation, Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty: An Empirical Examination , 2010 .

[20]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Designing electronic government information access programs: a holistic approach , 2004, Gov. Inf. Q..

[21]  Daniel Lathrop,et al.  Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice , 2010 .

[22]  Daniel J. Veit,et al.  Conceptualizing Business Models for Competitive Advantage Research by Integrating the Resource and Market-Based Views , 2011, AMCIS.

[23]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Creating Open Government Ecosystems: A Research and Development Agenda , 2012, Future Internet.

[24]  Manuel Trenz,et al.  Building Taxonomies in IS and Management - A Systematic Approach Based on Content Analysis , 2013, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[25]  A. Neely,et al.  Big Data for Big Business? A Taxonomy of Data-driven Business Models used by Start-up Firms , 2014 .

[26]  M. Janssen,et al.  Infomediary Business Models for Connecting Open Data Providers and Users , 2014 .

[27]  Amanda M Smith.  Police.uk and Data.police.uk: Developing Open Crime and Justice Data for the UK. , 2014 .

[28]  Vassilios Peristeras,et al.  Enabling Interoperability of Government Data Catalogues , 2010, EGOV.

[29]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[30]  Jo Bates,et al.  "This is what modern deregulation looks like" : co-optation and contestation in the shaping of the UK's Open Government Data Initiative , 2012, J. Community Informatics.

[31]  H. Turunen,et al.  Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. , 2013, Nursing & health sciences.

[32]  M. Avital,et al.  The Value of Open Government Data: A Strategic Analysis Framework , 2012 .

[33]  Justin Longo.  #Opendata: Digital-Era Governance Thoroughbred or New Public Management Trojan Horse? , 2011 .

[34]  John S. Erickson,et al.  The Web is My Back-end: Creating Mashups with Linked Open Government Data , 2011 .

[35]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  A Critical Assessment of Business Model Research , 2017 .

[36]  Agustí Cerrillo-i-Martínez.  The Reuse of Public Sector Information in Europe and Its Impact on Transparency , 2012 .

[37]  Sam Solaimani,et al.  A framework for the alignment of business model and business processes: A generic model for trans-sector innovation , 2012, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[38]  Fatemeh Ahmadi Zeleti,et al.  Business Models for the Open Data Industry: Characterization and Analysis of Emerging Models , 2014 .

[39]  P. David,et al.  Economic Fundamentals of the Knowledge Society , 2003 .

[40]  M. Janssen,et al.  Exploring the Factors Influencing the Adoption of Open Government Data by Private Organisations , 2015 .

[41]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  Generating Value from Open Government Data , 2013, ICIS.

[42]  Sarah M Kaufman.  Getting Started with Open Data: A Guide for Transportation Agencies , 2012 .

[43]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[44]  Mohammed Ibrahim,et al.  THEMATIC ANALYSIS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF ITS PROCESS AND EVALUATION , 2012 .

[45]  Gillian Oliver,et al.  Value in the MASH: Exploring the Benefits, Barriers and Enablers of Open Data Apps , 2020, ECIS.

[46]  A. Stott.  Open data for economic growth , 2014 .

[47]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[48]  D. Ugarriza,et al.  The Concept of Theme as Used in Qualitative Nursing Research , 2000, Western journal of nursing research.

[49]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research , 2002 .

[50]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  The Generative Mechanisms Of Open Government Data , 2013, ECIS.

[51]  A. Onetti,et al.  Internationalization, innovation and entrepreneurship: business models for new technology-based firms , 2012 .

[52]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[53]  R. Iemma.  Open Government Data: A Focus on Key Economic and Organizational Drivers , 2012 .

[54]  Joel Gurin,et al.  Open Data Now: The Secret to Hot Startups, Smart Investing, Savvy Marketing, and Fast Innovation , 2014 .

[55]  Benedetto Ponti,et al.  Open Data and Transparency: A Paradigm Shift , 2011 .