Relating nutrient uptake with transient storage in forested mountain streams

Streams control the timing and delivery of fluvial nutrient export from watersheds, and hydraulic processes such as transient storage may affect nutrient uptake and transformation. Although we expect that hydraulic processes that retain water will increase nutrient uptake, the relationship between transient storage and nutrient uptake is not clear. To examine this relationship, we injected a conservative tracer and nutrients (ammonium and phosphate) into 13 streams for a total of 37 injections at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF), New Hampshire. Transient storage was estimated by fitting conservative solute data to a one-dimensional advection, dispersion, transient storage model. To correct for variation in depth and velocity among streams, we considered nutrient uptake as a masstransfer coefficient (Vf), which estimates benthic demand for nutrients relative to supply. Transient storage decreased with increasing specific discharge (discharge per unit stream width). Transient storage explained only 14% of variation in ammonium Vf during the entire year and 35% of variation during summer months. Phosphate uptake was not related to transient storage, presumably because P uptake is predominantly by chemical sorption at HBEF. At HBEF, surface water pools can store water but were not modeled as such by use of the transient storage model. These pools were probably not important areas of nutrient uptake; further variation in the relationship between nutrient uptake and transient storage may be explained by biological demand.

[1]  J. Meyer.  The role of sediments and bryophytes in phosphorus dynamics in a headwater stream ecosystem1 , 1979 .

[2]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Control of Nitrogen Export from Watersheds by Headwater Streams , 2001, Science.

[3]  Brian J. Wagner,et al.  1 – Quantifying Hydrologic Interactions between Streams and Their Subsurface Hyporheic Zones , 2000 .

[4]  Deborah R. Hart,et al.  Parameter Estimation and Stochastic Interpretation of the Transient Storage Model For Solute Transport in Streams , 1995 .

[5]  M. E. Campana,et al.  ALLUVIAL CHARACTERISTICS, GROUNDWATER–SURFACE WATER EXCHANGE AND HYDROLOGICAL RETENTION IN HEADWATER STREAMS , 1997 .

[6]  Surface-subsurface exchange and nutrient spiraling: Chapter 6 , 2000 .

[7]  K. Bencala,et al.  Hyporheic zone hydrological processes , 2000 .

[8]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  Modelling nutrient-periphyton dynamics in streams: the importance of transient storage zones , 1995 .

[9]  D. Burns.  Retention of NO $$_3^ - $$ in an upland streamenvironment: A mass balance approach , 1998 .

[10]  Brian J. Wagner,et al.  Evaluating the Reliability of the Stream Tracer Approach to Characterize Stream‐Subsurface Water Exchange , 1996 .

[11]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Relationships between hydraulic parameters in a small stream under varying flow and seasonal conditions , 1999 .

[12]  P. Mulholland,et al.  Evidence that hyporheic zones increase heterotrophic metabolism and phosphorus uptake in forest streams , 1997 .

[13]  J. Meyer,et al.  Effects of litter exclusion and wood removal on phosphorus and nitrogen retention in a forest stream , 2000 .

[14]  M. E. Campana,et al.  Parent lithology, surface-groundwater exchange, and nitrate retention in headwater streams , 1996 .

[15]  A. Butturini,et al.  Effects of riparian vegetation removal on nutrient retention in a Mediterranean stream , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[16]  J. Elwood,et al.  Measurement of Phosphorus Uptake Length in Streams: Comparison of Radiotracer and Stable PO4 Releases , 1990 .

[17]  Nancy B. Grimm,et al.  Material Spiraling in Stream Corridors: A Telescoping Ecosystem Model , 1998, Ecosystems.

[18]  J. Meyer,et al.  Testing a Nitrogen-Cycling Model of a Forest Stream by Using a Nitrogen-15 Tracer Addition , 1998, Ecosystems.

[19]  Roy A. Walters,et al.  Simulation of solute transport in a mountain pool‐and‐riffle stream: A transient storage model , 1983 .

[20]  J. Meyer,et al.  Habitat-Specific Solute Retention in Two Small Streams: An Intersite Comparison , 1990 .

[21]  J. Harvey,et al.  Ammonium and Phosphate Dynamics in a , 1992 .

[22]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Phosphorus Dynamics in a Woodland Stream Ecosystem: A Study of Nutrient Spiralling , 1983 .

[23]  G. Likens,et al.  Biogeochemical responses of two forest streams to a 2-month calcium addition , 2001 .

[24]  C. Driscoll,et al.  Acid-base chemistry and aluminum transport in an acidic watershed and pond in New Hampshire , 1995 .

[25]  Gregory E. Schwarz,et al.  Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico , 2000, Nature.

[26]  L. Solórzano.  DETERMINATION OF AMMONIA IN NATURAL WATERS BY THE PHENOLHYPOCHLORITE METHOD 1 1 This research was fully supported by U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Contract No. ATS (11‐1) GEN 10, P.A. 20. , 1969 .

[27]  Nicholas G. Aumen,et al.  Concepts and methods for assessing solute dynamics in stream ecosystems , 1990 .

[28]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Measuring Nutrient Spiralling in Streams , 1981 .

[29]  A. Butturini,et al.  Importance of transient storage zones for ammonium and phosphate retention in a sandy-bottom Mediterranean stream , 1999 .

[30]  A. Bailey,et al.  Twenty years of change in a northern hardwood forest , 1999 .

[31]  G. Likens,et al.  IMPORTANCE OF ORGANIC DEBRIS DAMS IN THE STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF STREAM ECOSYSTEMS , 1980 .

[32]  Brian J. Wagner,et al.  Experimental design for estimating parameters of rate‐limited mass transfer: Analysis of stream tracer studies , 1997 .

[33]  D. J. D'Angelo,et al.  Transient Storage in Appalachian and Cascade Mountain Streams as Related to Hydraulic Characteristics , 1993, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[34]  G. Minshall,et al.  Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake in two Idaho (USA) headwater wilderness streams , 1999, Oecologia.