Technological adoption and use after mass market displacement: The case of the LP record

This paper investigates the reasons why some technologies, defying general expectations and the established models of technological change, may not disappear from the market after having been displaced from their once-dominant status. Our point of departure is that the established models of technological change are not suitable to explain this as they predominantly focus on technological dominance, giving attention to the technologies that display highest performance levels and gain greatest market share. And yet, technological landscapes are rife with technological designs that do not fulfil these conditions. Using the LP record as an empirical case, we propose that the central mechanism at play in the continuing market presence of once-dominant technologies is the recasting of their technological features from the functional-utilitarian to the aesthetic realm, with an additional element concerning communal interaction among users. The findings that emerge from our quantitative textual analysis of over 200,000 posts on a prominent online LP-related discussion forum (between 2002 and 2010) also suggest that the post-dominance technology adopters and users appear to share many key characteristics with the earliest adopters of new technologies, rather than with late-stage adopters which precede them.

[1]  Daniel C. Snow,et al.  BoldR: A New Strategy for Old Technologies , 2010 .

[2]  Gerlinde Mautner,et al.  Time to get wired: Using web-based corpora in critical discourse analysis , 2005 .

[3]  Mariano Nieto,et al.  Performance analysis of technology using the S curve model: the case of digital signal processing (DSP) , 1998 .

[4]  D. Polkinghorne.  Qualitative Research and Media Psychology , 2012 .

[5]  Ping Wang,et al.  Community Learning in Information Technology Innovation , 2009, MIS Q..

[6]  Giovani J.C. da Silveira,et al.  Innovation diffusion: research agenda for developing economies , 2001 .

[7]  P. Bourdieu.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[8]  J. Manzo.  Coffee, Connoisseurship, and an Ethnomethodologically-Informed Sociology of Taste , 2010 .

[9]  C. Flavián,et al.  The acceptance and diffusion of new consumer durables: differences between first and last adopters , 1998 .

[10]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  Experiential value: Conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and Internet shopping environment. , 2001 .

[11]  M. Styvén.  The Intangibility of Music in the Internet Age , 2007 .

[12]  Giuseppe Alessandro Veltri,et al.  Microblogging and nanotweets: Nanotechnology on Twitter , 2013, Public understanding of science.

[13]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[14]  N. Anand,et al.  When Market Information Constitutes Fields: Sensemaking of Markets in the Commercial Music Industry , 2000 .

[15]  Robert N. McGrath.  Technological discontinuities and media patterns: assessing electric vehicle batteries , 1998 .

[16]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Web Content Analysis: Expanding the Paradigm , 2009 .

[17]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[18]  Wendy L. Cukier,et al.  A critical analysis of media discourse on information technology: preliminary results of a proposed method for critical discourse analysis , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[19]  Ellinor Ehrnberg,et al.  On the definition and measurement of technological discontinuities , 1995 .

[20]  P. Magaudda.  When materiality ‘bites back’: Digital music consumption practices in the age of dematerialization , 2011 .

[21]  Jennifer L. Hartnett,et al.  Managing Quality: The Strategic and Competitive Edge , 1988 .

[22]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative analysis for social scientists: Codes and coding , 1987 .

[23]  J. Dijck,et al.  Record and Hold: Popular Music between Personal and Collective Memory , 2006 .

[24]  Richard T. Neer.  Connoisseurship and the Stakes of Style , 2005, Critical Inquiry.

[25]  Patrick J. Tierney,et al.  A qualitative analysis framework using natural language processing and graph theory , 2012 .

[26]  Barbara Wejnert.  Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: a Conceptual Framework. , 2002 .

[27]  Timothy R. Anderson,et al.  Technology Forecasting for Wireless Communication , 2008 .

[28]  Daniel C. Snow,et al.  'Old' Technology Responses to 'New' Technology Threats: Demand Heterogeneity and Graceful Technology Retreats , 2009 .

[29]  Yuejin Xu,et al.  Using Text Mining Techniques to Analyze Students' Written Responses to a Teacher Leadership Dilemma , 2012 .

[30]  Walter L. Welch,et al.  From Tinfoil to Stereo: The Acoustic Years of the Recording Industry, 1877-1929 , 1994 .

[31]  Exhausted Commodities: The Material Culture of Music , 2000 .

[32]  Lynn M. Martin.  Internet Adoption and Use in Small Firms: Internal Processes, Organisational Culture and the Roles of the Owner-Manager and Key Staff , 2005 .

[33]  R. V. Wyk.  Innovation: The attacker's advantage : Richard N. Foster 316 pages, £14.95 (London, Macmillan, 1986) , 1987 .

[34]  Amanda Nolen,et al.  The Content of Educational Psychology: an Analysis of Top Ranked Journals from 2003 Through 2007 , 2009 .

[35]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[36]  N. Phillips,et al.  The Birth of the 'Kodak Moment': Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Adoption of New Technologies , 2005 .

[37]  Matthew Kieran,et al.  THE VICE OF SNOBBERY: AESTHETIC KNOWLEDGE, JUSTIFICATION AND VIRTUE IN ART APPRECIATION , 2010 .

[38]  John F. Sherry,et al.  Teaching Old Brands New Tricks: Retro Branding and the Revival of Brand Meaning , 2003 .

[39]  Lost in translation: quantifying the overlap of popular media and non‐majors science course assessment vocabulary , 2012 .

[40]  Oliver Read.  The recording and reproduction of sound , 1949 .

[41]  Michael Sykes.  The compact disc, player and system , 1984 .

[42]  Frank Alpert,et al.  Innovator Buying Behavior Over Time:: The Innovator Buying Cycle and the Cumulative Effects of Innovations , 1994 .

[43]  George Plasketes.  Romancing the Record: The Vinyl De‐Evolution and Subcultural Evolution , 1992 .

[44]  What Do Category-Specific Semantic Deficits Tell Us about the Representation of Lexical Concepts? , 1999, Brain and Language.

[45]  Clayton M. Christensen.  EXPLORING THE LIMITS OF THE TECHNOLOGY S‐CURVE. PART I: COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES , 1992 .

[46]  S. Downing.  Retro Gaming Subculture and the Social Construction of a Piracy Ethic , 2011 .

[47]  Geoffrey A. Moore.  Crossing the chasm : marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers , 1999 .

[48]  Bowon Kim,et al.  Managing the transition of technology life cycle , 2003 .

[49]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[50]  P. Galloway,et al.  Personal Computers, Microhistory, and Shared Authority: Documenting the Inventor–Early Adopter Dialectic , 2011, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[51]  Philip A. Schrodt,et al.  Validity Assessment of a Machine-Coded Event Data Set for the Middle East, 1982-92 , 1994 .

[52]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Determination of Adopter Categories by Using Innovation Diffusion Models , 1990 .

[53]  Kazumasa Nakagawa,et al.  Benefits of off-campus education for students in the health sciences: a text-mining analysis , 2012, BMC medical education.

[54]  W H Ward,et al.  The sailing ship effect , 1967 .

[55]  Jeremy Wallach.  The Poetics of Electrosonic Presence: Recorded Music and the Materiality of Sound , 2003 .

[56]  Johann Peter Murmann,et al.  Dominant Designs, Technological Cycles and Organizational Outcomes , 2002 .

[57]  Will Straw.  The Music CD and Its Ends , 2009 .

[58]  Brenda Danet,et al.  No two alike: Play and aesthetics in collecting. , 1989 .

[59]  Berk Vaher.  IDENTITY POLITICS RECO(R)DED: VINYL HUNTERS AS EXOTES IN TIME , 2008 .

[60]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[61]  Noel A. Card.  Applied Meta-Analysis for Social Science Research , 2011 .

[62]  S. Hultén,et al.  Escaping lock-in: The case of the electric vehicle☆ , 1996 .

[63]  Stan J. Liebowitz,et al.  Record Sales, MP3 downloads and the Annihilation Hypothesis , 2003 .

[64]  Loizos Heracleous,et al.  Organizational Change as Discourse: Communicative Actions and Deep Structures in the Context of Information Technology Implementation , 2001 .

[65]  Maria Ek Styvén,et al.  The need to touch: Exploring the link between music involvement and tangibility preference , 2010 .

[66]  Colin Campbell,et al.  The desire for the new Its nature and social location as presented in theories of fashion and modern consumerism , 1994 .

[67]  Joshua D. Margolis,et al.  Navigating the Bind of Necessary Evils: Psychological Engagement and the Production of Interpersonally Sensitive Behavior , 2008 .

[68]  David Hayes,et al.  “Take Those Old Records off the Shelf”: Youth and Music Consumption in the Postmodern Age , 2006 .

[69]  Andreas Pyka,et al.  Informal networking and industrial life cycles , 2000 .

[70]  I. Kant,et al.  The Critique of Judgement , 2020 .

[71]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms , 1995 .

[72]  J. C. Fisher,et al.  A simple substitution model of technological change , 1971 .

[73]  Clayton M. Christensen.  Patterns in the evolution of product competition , 1997 .

[74]  C. Easingwood,et al.  Launching and Re-launching High-technology Products , 2002 .

[75]  Tim Paul Thomes.  An economic analysis of online streaming music services , 2013, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[76]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Toward a Systematic Framework for Research on Dominant Designs, Technological Innovations, and Industrial Change , 2005 .

[77]  `It kind of gives you that vintage feel': vinyl records and the trope of death , 2008 .

[78]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Finding the Right Job for Your Product , 2007 .