A quasi-static discomfort measure in whole-body vibration.

A new methodology for objective evaluation of discomfort in whole-body vibration (WBV) is introduced in this work. The proposed objective discomfort characterizes discomfort based on the relative motion between adjacent segments of the human body from neutral positions. It peaks when the joints reach their limits. The objective discomfort has been tested on five subjects in the fore-aft direction using discrete sinusoidal frequencies of 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, and 16 Hz. Each frequency file runs for 15 s with a 3 s resting period as a reference for discomfort comparison. All files run at a constant acceleration of 0.7 m/s(2). The subjects were tested with back support and without back support, and their subjective discomfort was reported based on the Borg CR-10 scale. The proposed objective discomfort has shown significant correlation with the subjective discomfort. The objective discomfort has also been tested on five subjects under multiple-axis random WBV with three common industrial seating configurations (seat-mounted control, floor-mounted control, and steering wheel), and has shown promising results.

[1]  Subhash Rakheja,et al.  The role of seat geometry and posture on the mechanical energy absorption characteristics of seated occupants under vertical vibration , 2006 .

[2]  Neil J. Mansfield,et al.  COMPARISON OF SUBJECTIVE RESPONSES TO VIBRATION AND SHOCK WITH STANDARD ANALYSIS METHODS AND ABSORBED POWER , 2000 .

[3]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 1998, International series in operations research and management science.

[4]  David M. Andrews,et al.  Development and evaluation of the Automotive Seating Discomfort Questionnaire (ASDQ) , 2006 .

[5]  David G. Wilder,et al.  Arm and shoulder muscle activity are greater with steering wheel vs. seat mounted controls , 2006 .

[6]  Subhash Rakheja,et al.  Influence of back support conditions on the apparent mass of seated occupants under horizontal vibration. , 2005, Industrial health.

[7]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Nonlinear subjective and dynamic responses of seated subjects exposed to horizontal whole-body vibration , 2009 .

[8]  J. Nadal,et al.  Lumbar back muscle activity of helicopter pilots and whole-body vibration. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Johannes L. van Niekerk,et al.  Verification of seat effective amplitude transmissibility (SEAT) value as a reliable metric to predict dynamic seat comfort , 2006 .

[10]  M J Griffin,et al.  Qualitative models of seat discomfort including static and dynamic factors , 2000, Ergonomics.

[11]  T. M. Hacaambwa,et al.  Subjective response to seated fore-and-aft direction whole-body vibration , 2007 .

[12]  N. Mansfield,et al.  The apparent mass of the seated human exposed to single-axis and multi-axis whole-body vibration. , 2007, Journal of Biomechanics.

[13]  S. McGill.  The biomechanics of low back injury: implications on current practice in industry and the clinic. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  M. H. Pope,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE BIOMECHANICS AND EPIDEMIOLOGY OF WORKING POSTURES (IT ISN'T ALWAYS VIBRATION WHICH IS TO BLAME!) , 1998 .

[15]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  The apparent mass of the seated human body in the fore-and-aft and lateral directions , 1990 .

[16]  C L Zimmermann,et al.  Effects of vibration frequency and postural changes on human responses to seated whole-body vibration exposure , 1997, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[17]  Carlos Romero,et al.  Bi-criteria utility functions: Analytical considerations and implications in the short-run labour market , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Use of multi-objective optimization for digital human posture prediction , 2009 .

[19]  Peter J Keir,et al.  Effects of backrest design on biomechanics and comfort during seated work. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[20]  Barbara Hinz,et al.  EFFECTS RELATED TO RANDOM WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION AND POSTURE ON A SUSPENDED SEATWITH AND WITHOUT BACKREST , 2002 .

[21]  M. Griffin,et al.  Quantitative prediction of overall seat discomfort , 2000, Ergonomics.

[22]  Neil J. Mansfield,et al.  Evaluation of subjective responses to whole-body vibration exposure: Effect of frequency content , 2008 .

[23]  Setsuo Maeda,et al.  Evaluation of whole-body vibration by the category judgment method. , 2005, Industrial health.

[24]  Karim Abdel-Malek,et al.  A New Discomfort Function for Optimization-Based Posture Prediction , 2005 .

[25]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Handbook of Human Vibration , 1990 .

[26]  W C Hutton,et al.  The effect of posture on the lumbar spine. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[27]  Setsuo Maeda,et al.  Effect of backrest and torso twist on the apparent mass of the seated body exposed to vertical vibration. , 2005, Industrial health.

[28]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering , 2004 .

[29]  Mike Kolich,et al.  Predicting automobile seat comfort using a neural network , 2004 .

[30]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Effects of posture and vibration magnitude on apparent mass and pelvis rotation during exposure to whole-body vertical vibration , 2002 .