Assessment of augmented visualization methods in multimedia engineering education

This paper presents a mixed-method study that combines quantitative and qualitative techniques to evaluate thetechnological profile and the motivation and satisfaction of Multimedia Engineering degree students using augmentedvisualization methods. New uses of technology in the education framework have been extended to all levels and sectors, butthese innovations require approval, validation and evaluation by the final users (i.e., the students) to ensure that they aresuitable. In this paper, we will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of applying mixed evaluation technology in a casestudy of the use of interactive and collaborative tools for the visualization of 3D virtual models in a subject related to aMultimedia Engineering degree. The main objective is to evaluate whether our students are prepared to use the systemsproposed, and to determine if the designed experiment generates an increase in the motivation and satisfaction using newdevices and systems to visualize complex models. Results showed that the combination of mixed-methods allowed us toobtain adequate feedback to improve future iterations of this type experiment.

[1]  Mansooreh Mollaghasemi,et al.  Usability engineering of virtual environments (VEs): identifying multiple criteria that drive effective VE system design , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[2]  Markel Vigo,et al.  Quantitative assessment of mobile web guidelines conformance , 2011, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[3]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Dan Wang,et al.  Why are children attracted to the Internet? The role of need satisfaction perceived online and perceived in daily real life , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Ning Fang,et al.  Improving engineering students’ technical and professional skills through project-based active and collaborative learning , 2012 .

[6]  Jiejie Zhu,et al.  Virtual Reality and Mixed Reality for Virtual Learning Environments , 2006, Edutainment.

[7]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality , 2003, Comput. Graph..

[8]  Aaron Paul Brakke Augmented Reality in Architecture , 2011 .

[9]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  User experience - a research agenda , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[10]  Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al.  Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  Judi Harris,et al.  What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2009 .

[12]  K. Brazil,et al.  Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research , 2002, Quality & quantity.

[13]  Cristina Manresa-Yee,et al.  Human-centred design in engineering curricula , 2012 .

[14]  Oscar Tomico,et al.  Bipolar laddering (BLA): a participatory subjective exploration method on user experience , 2007, DUX '07.

[15]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Applying qualitative content analysis to study online support communities , 2010, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[16]  Petra Wentzel,et al.  Using Mobile Technology to Enhance Students’ Educational Experiences : Case Study from the EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. , 2005 .

[17]  Hannes Kaufmann,et al.  General Training of Spatial Abilities by Geometry Education in Augmented Reality , 2006 .

[18]  James H. McMillan,et al.  Educational Research: Fundamentals for the Consumer. Second Edition. , 1996 .

[19]  David Fonseca,et al.  User Experiences and Differences in Viewing Architectural Images with Various Interfaces , 2011, Int. J. Creative Interfaces Comput. Graph..

[20]  David Fonseca,et al.  Relationship between student profile, tool use, participation, and academic performance with the use of Augmented Reality technology for visualized architecture models , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Martin White,et al.  Web3D and Augmented Reality to support engineering education , 2004 .

[22]  Mariano Alcañiz Raya,et al.  Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students , 2010, Comput. Graph..

[23]  David J. Silverman,et al.  Qualitative Research, 3rd edition , 2010 .

[24]  David Fonseca,et al.  Construction Processes Using Mobile Augmented Reality: A Study Case in Building Engineering Degree , 2013, WorldCIST.

[25]  Jiang Lan,et al.  An analysis of copyright-related legal cases and decisions: implications to designing Internet-based learning activities , 1999 .