Do different levels of moderate feed deprivation in dairy cows affect feeding motivation

Abstract Dairy cows grazed on pasture are likely to experience seasonal fluctuations in both the quantity and quality of forage available. In order to better understand how the variation in feed supply influences animal welfare, we need to understand the degree of hunger experienced during various levels of feed restriction. The aim of this study was to study feeding motivation in dairy cows by measuring cows’ motivation to walk for food at different levels of feed deprivation. In the first study 18 lactating dairy cows were divided into three groups of six, with one group being tested each day, and each group tested four times, once every 3 days. Each cow was randomly allocated to one of four different levels of feed deprivation (0, 3, 6 or 9 h) and then given the opportunity to walk a number of consecutively increasing distances along a race in a U-turn to obtain a specified amount of food (increasing distance by 20 m starting at 20 m). All cows were randomly exposed to all feed deprivation levels over the 12 days in a crossover design. Maximal distance walked, milk production, body weight and body condition score (BCS) were monitored during the test period. The experiment was repeated with 12 non-lactating cows (divided into three groups of four) following the same protocol as in the first study. In the lactating cows, there was a significant effect of treatment on maximal distance walked with maximal distance increasing approximately linearly with increasing feeding deprivation levels. In both lactating and non-lactating cows, there was a significant effect of body weight on maximal distance walked with lighter cows walking greater distances. There was no significant relationship between BCS or daily milk production and maximal distance walked. The results show that feeding motivation in lactating dairy cows increases within a few hours of feed deprivation and that lighter cows may be more motivated to spend energy to obtain a limited amount of food compared to heavier cows. We conclude that this method is suitable for studying feeding motivation, at least in lactating dairy cattle. However, more research is needed to provide information about the levels of hunger at which an animal starts to suffer.

[1]  V. Lankin.  Factors of diversity of domestic behaviour in sheep , 1997, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[2]  G. Mason,et al.  Models of motivational decision-making and how they affect the experimental assessment of motivational priorities , 1997 .

[3]  T. Lindström.  Feeding behaviour in dairy cows. Motivational aspects. , 2000 .

[4]  C. Stockdale.  Body condition at calving and the performance of dairy cows in early lactation under Australian conditions: a review , 2001 .

[5]  H. Keulen,et al.  Effect of timing and duration of grazing of growing cattle in the West African Sahel on diet selection, faecal output, eating time, forage intake and live-weight changes and nutrition and performance of cattle , 2001 .

[6]  J. Metz.  The reaction of cows to a short-term deprivation of lying , 1985 .

[7]  F. Toates,et al.  Who needs 'behavioural needs'? Motivational aspects of the needs of animals , 1993 .

[8]  L. Pedersen,et al.  Prior deprivation and reward duration affect the demand function for rest in dairy heifers , 2004 .

[9]  M. Cockram,et al.  Methods for Measuring Feeding Motivation in Sheep , 1999, Animal Welfare.

[10]  B. Dumont,et al.  How readily will sheep walk for a preferred forage? , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[11]  K. Macdonald.  Condition Scoring Made Easy , 2004 .

[12]  M. Meunier-Salaün,et al.  Does the number of daily meals affect feeding motivation and behaviour of gilts fed high-fibre diets? , 2002 .

[13]  N. R. Richardson,et al.  Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats: a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  K. Holtenius,et al.  Changes in metabolism and milk production during and after feed deprivation in primiparous cows selected for different milk fat content , 2003 .

[15]  P. Osuji.  The physiology of eating and the energy expenditure of the r uminant at pasture. , 1974 .

[16]  C. Sherwin.  Priority of access to limited feed, butting hierarchy and movement order in a large group of sheep , 1990 .

[17]  B. Dumont,et al.  Choice of sheep and cattle between vegetative and reproductive cocksfoot patches , 1995 .

[18]  Short-term choices of cattle vary with relative quality and accessibility of two hays according to an energy gain maximisation hypothesis , 2002 .

[19]  W HODOS,et al.  Progressive Ratio as a Measure of Reward Strength , 1961, Science.

[20]  A. Sibbald.  The effect of body condition on the feeding behaviour of sheep with different times or access to food , 1997 .

[21]  P. Cornelius,et al.  Short‐term fasts and the ingestive behaviour of grazing cattle , 1989 .

[22]  B. Dumont,et al.  An indoor method for studying the preferences of sheep and cattle at pasture , 1995 .

[23]  Lindsay R. Matthews,et al.  Environmental requirements of pigs measured by behavioural demand functions , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  P. Corva,et al.  Energy expenditure of cattle walking on a flat terrain , 1996 .

[25]  M. Appleby,et al.  Demand for nest boxes in laying hens , 1996, Behavioural Processes.

[26]  A. Lawrence,et al.  The effect of food deprivation on the expression of foraging and exploratory behaviour in the growing pig. , 1995 .