A selective effect of parietal damage on letter identification in mixed case words

We investigated the reading of cAsE mIxInG and contrast reduction on word reading in patients with unilateral parietal lesions and attentional deficits. We show that, compared with control participants, the patients produce selective increases in lateralised errors when reading mixed case relative to same case words. However, there were not reliable increases in lateralised errors when words were degraded by low contrast. The patients also showed some increases in contralesional errors at a task aimed at feature processing in words (a gap detection task), but these effects were not increased for mixed case stimuli and errors were reduced relative to the word reading task. The results are consistent with mixed case words stressing attention-demanding letter identification, drawing-out an impairment in the patients in attending to contralesional stimuli. On the other hand, effects of contrast reduction are accommodated without necessarily recruiting attentional processes mediated by the posterior parietal lobe.

[1]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Models of word recognition , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Attention, spatial representation, and visual neglect: simulating emergent attention and spatial memory in the selective attention for identification model (SAIM). , 2003, Psychological review.

[3]  K. Dobkins,et al.  Attentional effects on contrast discrimination in humans: evidence for both contrast gain and response gain , 2004, Vision Research.

[4]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Levels of representation, co-ordinate frames, and unilateral neglect , 1990 .

[5]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[6]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Representation and Process , 1991 .

[7]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Visual attention: Insights from brain imaging , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  Jon Driver,et al.  Reading of letters and words in a patient with Balint's syndrome , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  James C. Johnston,et al.  Reading and the mental lexicon: on the uptake of visual information , 1989 .

[10]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  Hans-Otto Karnath,et al.  Deficits of attention in acute and recovered visual hemi-neglect , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The Effects of Case Mixing on Word Recognition: Evidence from a PET Study , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Duncan,et al.  Competitive brain activity in visual attention , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[15]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Different impairments contribute to neglect dyslexia , 1991 .

[16]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Neuropsychological Evidence for Case-Specific Reading: Multi-Letter Units in Visual Word Recognition , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[17]  L. Bérubé,et al.  [Clinical neuropsychology]. , 1982, Nursing Quebec.

[18]  G. Humphreys,et al.  A case of integrative visual agnosia. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  James L. McClelland Letter and configuration information in word identification , 1977 .

[20]  J. Riddoch,et al.  Interaction of attentional and lexical processes in neglect dyslexia , 1990 .

[21]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Visual Search Performance in the Neglect Syndrome , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The Special Effect of Case Mixing on Word Identification: Neuropsychological and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies Dissociating Case Mixing from Contrast Reduction , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neural Systems for Visual Orienting and Their Relationships to Spatial Working Memory , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.