Characterization of parallel-hole collimator using Monte Carlo Simulation

Objective: Accuracy of in vivo activity quantification improves after the correction of penetrated and scattered photons. However, accurate assessment is not possible with physical experiment. We have used Monte Carlo Simulation to accurately assess the contribution of penetrated and scattered photons in the photopeak window. Materials and Methods: Simulations were performed with Simulation of Imaging Nuclear Detectors Monte Carlo Code. The simulations were set up in such a way that it provides geometric, penetration, and scatter components after each simulation and writes binary images to a data file. These components were analyzed graphically using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, USA). Each binary image was imported in software (ImageJ) and logarithmic transformation was applied for visual assessment of image quality, plotting profile across the center of the images and calculating full width at half maximum (FWHM) in horizontal and vertical directions. Results: The geometric, penetration, and scatter at 140 keV for low-energy general-purpose were 93.20%, 4.13%, 2.67% respectively. Similarly, geometric, penetration, and scatter at 140 keV for low-energy high-resolution (LEHR), medium-energy general-purpose (MEGP), and high-energy general-purpose (HEGP) collimator were (94.06%, 3.39%, 2.55%), (96.42%, 1.52%, 2.06%), and (96.70%, 1.45%, 1.85%), respectively. For MEGP collimator at 245 keV photon and for HEGP collimator at 364 keV were 89.10%, 7.08%, 3.82% and 67.78%, 18.63%, 13.59%, respectively. Conclusion: Low-energy general-purpose and LEHR collimator is best to image 140 keV photon. HEGP can be used for 245 keV and 364 keV; however, correction for penetration and scatter must be applied if one is interested to quantify the in vivo activity of energy 364 keV. Due to heavy penetration and scattering, 511 keV photons should not be imaged with HEGP collimator.

[1]  R C Lanza,et al.  Development and validation of a Monte Carlo simulation of photon transport in an Anger camera. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[2]  Eric C. Frey,et al.  Application of task-based measures of image quality to optimization and evaluation of three-dimensional reconstruction-based compensation methods in myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  M. King,et al.  Human-observer receiver-operating-characteristic evaluation of attenuation, scatter, and resolution compensation strategies for (99m)Tc myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Xiaowei Liu,et al.  A 3-dimensional absorbed dose calculation method based on quantitative SPECT for radionuclide therapy: evaluation for (131)I using monte carlo simulation. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  E C Frey,et al.  Quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography: basics and clinical considerations. , 1994, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[6]  Eric C Frey,et al.  Optimum compensation method and filter cutoff frequency in myocardial SPECT: a human observer study. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  C. Byrne,et al.  Reducing the influence of the partial volume effect on SPECT activity quantitation with 3D modelling of spatial resolution in iterative reconstruction. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  K F Koral,et al.  Characterization of scatter and penetration using Monte Carlo simulation in 131I imaging. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Michael A. King,et al.  LROC analysis of detector-response compensation in SPECT , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.