Relationships and social rules: Teens' social network and other ICT selection practices

The issue of how teens choose social networks and information communication technologies (ICT's) for personal communication is complex. This study focused on describing how U.S. teens from a highly technological suburban high school select ICT's for personal communication purposes. Two research questions guided the study: (a) What factors influence high school seniors’ selection of online social networks and other ICT's for everyday communication? (b) How can social network theory (SNT) help to explain how teens select online social networks and other ICT's for everyday communication purposes? Using focus groups, a purposive sample of 45 teens were asked to discuss (a) their preferred methods for communicating with friends and family and why, (b) the reasons why they chose to engage (or not to engage) in online social networking, (c) how they selected ICT's for social networking and other communication purposes, and (d) how they decided whom to accept as online “friends.” Findings indicated that many factors influenced participants’ ICT selection practices including six major categories of selection factors: relationship factors, information/communication factors, social factors, systems factors, self-protection factors, and recipient factors. SNT was also helpful in explaining how “friendship” was a major determining factor in their communication media and platform choices. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Gustavo S. Mesch,et al.  Social Relationships and Internet Use among Adolescents in Israel , 2001 .

[2]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail , 1991 .

[3]  Henry Jenkins Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .

[4]  June Abbas,et al.  High school seniors' social network and other ICT use preferences and concerns , 2010, ASIST.

[5]  Leah A. Lievrouw,et al.  NEW MEDIA, MEDIATION, AND COMMUNICATION STUDY1 , 2009 .

[6]  D. Morgan Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[7]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[8]  Irina Shklovski,et al.  Teenage Communication in the Instant Messaging Era , 2006, Computers, Phones, and the Internet.

[9]  Matthew S. Eastin,et al.  Teen Internet Use: Relating Social Perceptions and Cognitive Models to Behavior , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[10]  Katherine M. White,et al.  The phone connection: A qualitative exploration of how belongingness and social identification relate to mobile phone use amongst Australian youth , 2009 .

[11]  L. Srivastava,et al.  Mobile phones and the evolution of social behaviour , 2005, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[12]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[13]  Stephanie M. Reich,et al.  Online and Offline Social Networks: Use of Social Networking Sites by Emerging Adults , 2008 .

[14]  M. Berson,et al.  Emerging Risks of Violence in the Digital Age , 2002 .

[15]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  University Students' Local And Distant Social Ties: Using and integrating modes of communication on campus , 2007 .

[16]  J. Alison Bryant,et al.  IMing, Text Messaging, and Adolescent Social Networks , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  Mark S. Granovetter T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[18]  David R. Brake,et al.  ON THE RAPID RISE OF SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES: NEW FINDINGS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS , 2010 .

[19]  Seounmi Youn,et al.  Online Word-of-Mouth (or Mouse): An Exploration of Its Antecedents and Consequences , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network , 2007, CHI.

[21]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Social and technical challenges in parenting teens' social media use , 2011, CHI.

[22]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression , 2008, New Media Soc..

[23]  H. Clarizio,et al.  Continuity in childhood depression. , 1989, Adolescence.

[24]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Expectancies and the Evaluative Consequences of Violations , 1990 .

[25]  Margaret Morrison,et al.  Coming of age with the internet , 2006, New Media Soc..

[26]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[27]  P. Greenfield,et al.  Online Communication and Adolescent Relationships , 2008, The Future of children.

[28]  Joseph A. Salem,et al.  Library on the Go: A Focus Group Study of the Mobile Web and the Academic Library , 2011, Coll. Res. Libr..

[29]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Social Consequences of the Internet for Adolescents , 2009 .

[30]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  Internet Communication and Its Relation to Well-Being: Identifying Some Underlying Mechanisms , 2007 .

[31]  Alexandra Rankin Macgill,et al.  Teens and social media , 2008 .

[32]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[33]  Neera Kapur Badhwar,et al.  Friends as Ends in Themselves , 1987 .

[34]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Preadolescents' and adolescents' online communication and their closeness to friends. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[35]  Patricia G. Lange,et al.  Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project , 2009 .

[36]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Precursors and Underlying Processes of Adolescents' Online Self-Disclosure: Developing and Testing an “Internet-Attribute-Perception” Model , 2006 .

[37]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  Murni Mahmud,et al.  A study of the use of mobile phones by older persons , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[39]  Gustavo S. Mesch,et al.  Similarity and the Quality of Online and Offline Social Relationships Among Adolescents in Israel , 2007 .

[40]  B. Clarke Early Adolescents' Use of Social Networking Sites to Maintain Friendship and Explore Identity: Implications for Policy , 2009 .

[41]  Justin W. Patchin,et al.  Personal information of adolescents on the Internet: A quantitative content analysis of MySpace. , 2008, Journal of adolescence.

[42]  Katrien Van Cleemput,et al.  “I’ll See You on IM, Text, or Call You”: A Social Network Approach of Adolescents’ Use of Communication Media , 2010 .

[43]  Amanda Williams,et al.  A review of online social networking profiles by adolescents: implications for future research and intervention. , 2008, Adolescence.

[44]  Kenichi Ishii Implications of Mobility: The Uses of Personal Communication Media in Everyday Life , 2006 .

[45]  N. Leech,et al.  A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research , 2009 .

[46]  Rosemary Luckin,et al.  Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16‐year‐old students , 2009 .

[47]  Elisheva F. Gross,et al.  Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report , 2004 .

[48]  Laura Czerniewicz,et al.  Describing or debunking? The net generation and digital natives , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[49]  H. Kelman Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[50]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  How Risky Are Social Networking Sites? A Comparison of Places Online Where Youth Sexual Solicitation and Harassment Occurs , 2008, Pediatrics.

[51]  Elisheva F. Gross,et al.  Internet Use and Well-Being in Adolescence , 2002 .

[52]  N. Nie Sociability, Interpersonal Relations, and the Internet , 2001 .

[53]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Capitalizing on the Net: Social Contact, Civic Engagement, and Sense of Community , 2008 .

[55]  Louise Barkhuus,et al.  Student socialization in the age of facebook , 2010, CHI.

[56]  Richard M. Lee,et al.  Measuring belongingness: The Social Connectedness and the Social Assurance scales. , 1995 .

[57]  June Ahn,et al.  The effect of social network sites on adolescents' social and academic development: Current theories and controversies , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[58]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Configurations of Relationships in Different Media: FtF, Email, Instant Messenger, Mobile Phone, and SMS , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[59]  Debra Rickwood,et al.  Teens in Cyberspace: Do They Encounter Friend or Foe? , 2004 .

[60]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[61]  Aaron Smith,et al.  Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. , 2010 .

[62]  H. Kohut,et al.  How does analysis cure , 1984 .

[63]  S. Desmarais,et al.  Hey Mom, What’s on Your Facebook? Comparing Facebook Disclosure and Privacy in Adolescents and Adults , 2012 .

[64]  A. Lenhart,et al.  Social networking websites and teens: an overview , 2007 .

[65]  Justin W. Patchin,et al.  Trends in online social networking: adolescent use of MySpace over time , 2010, New Media Soc..

[66]  Stephanie Rosenbaum,et al.  Focus groups in HCI: wealth of information or waste of resources? , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[67]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[68]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Social Beings: Core Motives in Social Psychology , 2003 .

[69]  Ran Wei,et al.  Staying connected while on the move , 2006, New Media Soc..

[70]  Michele J. Fleming,et al.  Safety in Cyberspace , 2006 .

[71]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[72]  J. Meek,et al.  Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: ‘It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work’ , 2009 .

[73]  Dominic E. Madell,et al.  Control over Social Interactions: An Important Reason for Young People's Use of the Internet and Mobile Phones for Communication? , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[74]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Social construction of communication technology , 1993 .

[75]  Jaquelina E. Álvarez,et al.  Internet research : The role of the focus group , 2000 .