The relevance of hydroxyapatite and spongious titanium coatings in fixation of cementless stems

Abstract Pure titanium rods plasma-spray coated with hydroxyapatite (HA) or porous titanium (Ti) of controlled roughness were implanted bilaterally in the distal femur of Sprague-Dawley rats to compare the extent of bone growth on the two types of coating. The relevance of other factors, like mechanical stability and biological adaptation of the bone to the insertion of a foreign body implant, were investigated in femora which were over-reamed (absence of primary fit) or reamed without insertion of the rod. Continuous tetracycline labeling for the first 30 days and for the last 2 weeks in the 90-day group was performed; histological/histometric, fluorescence and microangiographic studies were carried out on serial sections of the implanted and control femora. In the group of stable implants, HA-coated rods showed 90% integration versus 53% with Ti-coated implants (P < 0.001); in over-reamed implants neither surface bone growth nor endosteal fixation occurred, and both types of rods were surrounded by a thick layer of connective tissue. The study documented early adhesion of osteoblasts and direct deposition of bone matrix on the substrate, while on spongious titanium osteogenesis was observed only in proximity to the surface. Remodeling of the reactive, primary bone to mature, lamellar bone took the form of a capsule surrounding the implants and radial bridges connecting the latter to the endosteal surface. The number, height and thickness of these bridges appeared to be the factors determining implant stability, rather than the extent of the bony capsule on the perimeter of the implant. Integration was a function not only of mechanical conditions and surface geometry, but also of the biological response of the whole bone to changes in the vascularization pattern. The reported phenomena can be seen more easily in experimental models involving small rodents because of their fast bone turnover and revascularization, but it is expected that they take place, even at a lower speed, in clinical situations like cementless stems of total hip replacement.

[1]  P. Cherubino,et al.  Bone reaction to the implant of intramedullary pins of three different metals in rat femur , 1991 .

[2]  R M Pilliar,et al.  The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  G. Danckwardt-Lillieström Reaming of the medullary cavity and its effect on diaphyseal bone. A fluorochromic, microangiographic and histologic study on the rabbit tibia and dog femur. , 1969, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[4]  R. Holmes,et al.  Porous hydroxyapatite as a bone graft substitute in diaphyseal defects: A histometric study , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  J. Galante,et al.  A comparative study of porous coatings in a weight-bearing total hip-arthroplasty model. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  P. Ducheyne,et al.  Effect of hydroxyapatite impregnation on skeletal bonding of porous coated implants. , 1980, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  R M Pilliar,et al.  The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone. , 1973, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  C. Nelson,et al.  Experimental reaming of the proximal femur and acrylic cement implantation: vascular and histologic effects. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  C. Bünger,et al.  Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite‐coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  I. Hvid,et al.  Gap healing enhanced by hydroxyapatite coating in dogs. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  A. Cigada,et al.  Post-deposition treatment effects on hydroxyapatite vacuum plasma spray coatings , 1994 .

[12]  C. Klein,et al.  Bonding of bone to apatite-coated implants. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  V. Goldberg,et al.  The influence of a hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate coating on bone growth into titanium fiber-metal implants. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  A. Cigada,et al.  Adhesion properties of plasma sprayed hydroxylapatite coatings for orthopaedic prostheses. , 1993, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[15]  K. Bachus,et al.  Mineral apposition rates of human cancellous bone at the interface of porous coated implants. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[16]  K. Bachus,et al.  Postmortem comparative analysis of titanium and hydroxyapatite porous-coated femoral implants retrieved from the same patient. A case study. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  J. Trueta,et al.  Vascular changes caused by the Küntscher type of nailing; an experimental study in the rabbit. , 1955, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  C. Klein,et al.  Plasma sprayed coatings of hydroxylapatite. , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[19]  H. Weinans,et al.  Mechanically induced bone adaptations around orthopaedic implants , 1991 .

[20]  M. Freeman,et al.  The effect of hydroxyapatite coating on ingrowth of bone into cavities in an implant. , 1991, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  S. Cook,et al.  The effect of operative fit and hydroxyapatite coating on the mechanical and biological response to porous implants. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  G. Lange,et al.  Histological and ultrastructural appearance of the hydroxyapatite-bone interface. , 1990 .

[23]  S. Olerud,et al.  Intracortical circulation after intramedullary reaming with reduction of pressure in the medullary cavity. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  P. Thomsen,et al.  Ultrastructure of the bone-titanium interface in rabbits , 1992 .

[25]  W H Harris,et al.  Bone ingrowth into porous coated canine acetabular replacements: the effect of pore size, apposition, and dislocation. , 1985, The Hip.

[26]  L. Gothman The normal arterial pattern of the rabbit's tibia. A microangiographic study. , 1960, Acta chirurgica Scandinavica.

[27]  C. Bünger,et al.  Hydroxyapatite coating enhances fixation of porous coated implants. A comparison in dogs between press fit and noninterference fit. , 1990, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[28]  I Macnab,et al.  The rate of bone ingrowth into porous metal. , 1976, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[29]  K. Bachus,et al.  Comparative study of human cancellous bone remodeling to titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[30]  E. Chao,et al.  Bone ingrowth analysis and interface evaluation of hydroxyapatite coated versus uncoated titanium porous bone implants , 1994 .