Optimizing experimental procedures for quantitative evaluation of crop plant performance in high throughput phenotyping systems

Detailed and standardized protocols for plant cultivation in environmentally controlled conditions are an essential prerequisite to conduct reproducible experiments with precisely defined treatments. Setting up appropriate and well defined experimental procedures is thus crucial for the generation of solid evidence and indispensable for successful plant research. Non-invasive and high throughput (HT) phenotyping technologies offer the opportunity to monitor and quantify performance dynamics of several hundreds of plants at a time. Compared to small scale plant cultivations, HT systems have much higher demands, from a conceptual and a logistic point of view, on experimental design, as well as the actual plant cultivation conditions, and the image analysis and statistical methods for data evaluation. Furthermore, cultivation conditions need to be designed that elicit plant performance characteristics corresponding to those under natural conditions. This manuscript describes critical steps in the optimization of procedures for HT plant phenotyping systems. Starting with the model plant Arabidopsis, HT-compatible methods were tested, and optimized with regard to growth substrate, soil coverage, watering regime, experimental design (considering environmental inhomogeneities) in automated plant cultivation and imaging systems. As revealed by metabolite profiling, plant movement did not affect the plants' physiological status. Based on these results, procedures for maize HT cultivation and monitoring were established. Variation of maize vegetative growth in the HT phenotyping system did match well with that observed in the field. The presented results outline important issues to be considered in the design of HT phenotyping experiments for model and crop plants. It thereby provides guidelines for the setup of HT experimental procedures, which are required for the generation of reliable and reproducible data of phenotypic variation for a broad range of applications.

[1]  Ioan Vlad Uilecan,et al.  HYPOTrace: Image Analysis Software for Measuring Hypocotyl Growth and Shape Demonstrated on Arabidopsis Seedlings Undergoing Photomorphogenesis1[OA] , 2009, Plant Physiology.

[2]  Christian Klukas,et al.  Integrated Analysis Platform: An Open-Source Information System for High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping1[C][W][OPEN] , 2014, Plant Physiology.

[3]  Ulrich Schurr,et al.  Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. , 2013, Annual review of plant biology.

[4]  H. M. Vernon.  Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre , 1909, Nature.

[5]  M. Yano,et al.  SmartGrain: High-Throughput Phenotyping Software for Measuring Seed Shape through Image Analysis1[C][W][OA] , 2012, Plant Physiology.

[6]  V. Alchanatis,et al.  Review: Sensing technologies for precision specialty crop production , 2010 .

[7]  G. V. Dyke.  Agricultural field experiments: Design and analysis , 1995 .

[8]  J. Araus,et al.  Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. , 2014, Trends in plant science.

[9]  A. Melchinger,et al.  Genetic Variation among Inbred Lines and Testcrosses of Maize for Early Growth Parameters and Their Relationship to Final Dry Matter Yield , 2012 .

[10]  H. Scharr,et al.  Simultaneous phenotyping of leaf growth and chlorophyll fluorescence via GROWSCREEN FLUORO allows detection of stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and other rosette plants. , 2009, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[11]  Snezana Lawrence.  October , 1855, The Hospital.

[12]  Bettina Berger,et al.  Accounting for variation in designing greenhouse experiments with special reference to greenhouses containing plants on conveyor systems , 2013, Plant Methods.

[13]  M. Sheshshayee,et al.  Carbon Isotope Discrimination Accurately Reflects Variability in WUE Measured at a Whole Plant Level in Rice , 2005 .

[14]  M. Tester,et al.  Phenomics--technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. , 2011, Trends in plant science.

[15]  Angela L. Elwell,et al.  Separating parental environment from seed size effects on next generation growth and development in Arabidopsis. , 2011, Plant, cell & environment.

[16]  C. Tonelli,et al.  Survival and growth of Arabidopsis plants given limited water are not equal , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  Chi-Ren Shyu,et al.  PhenoPhyte: a flexible affordable method to quantify 2D phenotypes from imagery , 2012, Plant Methods.

[18]  Michael P. Pound,et al.  RootNav: Navigating Images of Complex Root Architectures1[C][W] , 2013, Plant Physiology.

[19]  Thomas Altmann,et al.  Heterosis of Biomass Production in Arabidopsis. Establishment during Early Development1 , 2004, Plant Physiology.

[20]  C. Glasbey,et al.  SPICY: towards automated phenotyping of large pepper plants in the greenhouse. , 2012, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[21]  J. Trygg,et al.  LAMINA: a tool for rapid quantification of leaf size and shape parameters , 2008, BMC Plant Biology.

[22]  B. Usadel,et al.  Xeml Lab: a tool that supports the design of experiments at a graphical interface and generates computer-readable metadata files, which capture information about genotypes, growth conditions, environmental perturbations and sampling strategy. , 2009, Plant, cell & environment.

[23]  S. Omholt,et al.  Phenomics: the next challenge , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[24]  O. Loudet,et al.  Phenoscope: an automated large-scale phenotyping platform offering high spatial homogeneity. , 2013, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[25]  Elizabeth Eich,et al.  Thigmomorphogenesis: a complex plant response to mechano-stimulation. , 2008, Journal of experimental botany.

[26]  J. Selbig,et al.  Metabolite profile analysis: from raw data to regression and classification. , 2007, Physiologia plantarum.

[27]  L. Dietzel,et al.  Photosynthetic acclimation responses of maize seedlings grown under artificial laboratory light gradients mimicking natural canopy conditions , 2013, Front. Plant Sci..

[28]  Hanno Scharr,et al.  Diel Growth Cycle of Isolated Leaf Discs Analyzed with a Novel, High-Throughput Three-Dimensional Imaging Method Is Identical to That of Intact Leaves1[W] , 2009, Plant Physiology.

[29]  W. Johannsen.  Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre , 2015 .

[30]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  Transforming Agriculture through Pervasive Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[31]  Janet Braam,et al.  In touch: plant responses to mechanical stimuli. , 2004, The New phytologist.

[32]  C. Granier,et al.  Phenotyping and beyond: modelling the relationships between traits. , 2014, Current opinion in plant biology.

[33]  E. Finkel.  Imaging. With 'phenomics,' plant scientists hope to shift breeding into overdrive. , 2009, Science.

[34]  Oliver Hofmann,et al.  ISA software suite: supporting standards-compliant experimental annotation and enabling curation at the community level , 2010, Bioinform..

[35]  K. Chenu,et al.  PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[36]  V. Paakkarinen,et al.  PROTON GRADIENT REGULATION5 Is Essential for Proper Acclimation of Arabidopsis Photosystem I to Naturally and Artificially Fluctuating Light Conditions[W] , 2012, Plant Cell.

[37]  C. Klukas,et al.  Dissecting the Phenotypic Components of Crop Plant Growth and Drought Responses Based on High-Throughput Image Analysis[W][OPEN] , 2014, Plant Cell.

[38]  Francois Tardieu,et al.  Leaf growth rate per unit thermal time follows QTL-dependent daily patterns in hundreds of maize lines under naturally fluctuating conditions. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[39]  Bernd Rinn,et al.  Probing the Reproducibility of Leaf Growth and Molecular Phenotypes: A Comparison of Three Arabidopsis Accessions Cultivated in Ten Laboratories1[W] , 2010, Plant Physiology.

[40]  H. Scharr,et al.  GROWSCREEN-Rhizo is a novel phenotyping robot enabling simultaneous measurements of root and shoot growth for plants grown in soil-filled rhizotrons. , 2012, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[41]  B. S. Dhillon,et al.  Breeding maize as biogas substrate in Central Europe: II. Quantitative-genetic parameters for inbred lines and correlations with testcross performance , 2011, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[42]  H. Griffiths.  Carbon isotope discrimination , 1993 .

[43]  B. Martin,et al.  Carbon isotope discrimination as a tool to improve water-use efficiency in tomato , 1999 .

[44]  Pascal Neveu,et al.  PHENOPSIS DB: an Information System for Arabidopsis thaliana phenotypic data in an environmental context , 2011, BMC Plant Biology.

[45]  L. Willmitzer,et al.  A tyrosine aminotransferase involved in tocopherol synthesis in Arabidopsis. , 2012, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[46]  Daniel Parnham,et al.  LeafAnalyser: a computational method for rapid and large-scale analyses of leaf shape variation. , 2008, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[47]  Gustavo A. Pereyra-Irujo,et al.  GlyPh: a low-cost platform for phenotyping plant growth and water use. , 2012, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[48]  E. Wallihan,et al.  Efficiency of Glasshouse Pot Experiments Rotating versus Stationary Benches. , 1971, Plant physiology.

[49]  A. Greenberg,et al.  Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype–phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[50]  R. G. Petersen,et al.  Agricultural Field Experiments. , 1996 .

[51]  C. Job,et al.  Seed germination and vigor. , 2012, Annual review of plant biology.

[52]  Henning Redestig,et al.  TargetSearch - a Bioconductor package for the efficient preprocessing of GC-MS metabolite profiling data , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[53]  Alan G. Clewer,et al.  Practical Statistics and Experimental Design for Plant and Crop Science , 2001 .

[54]  Falk Schreiber,et al.  HTPheno: An image analysis pipeline for high-throughput plant phenotyping , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[55]  Uwe Scholz,et al.  e!DAL - a framework to store, share and publish research data , 2014, BMC Bioinformatics.

[56]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Potential of Wireless Sensor Networks for Measuring Soil Water Content Variability , 2010 .

[57]  Philip N Benfey,et al.  From lab to field, new approaches to phenotyping root system architecture. , 2011, Current opinion in plant biology.

[58]  W. Philips,et al.  Rosette Tracker: An Open Source Image Analysis Tool for Automatic Quantification of Genotype Effects1[C][W] , 2012, Plant Physiology.

[59]  Fabio Fiorani,et al.  The art of growing plants for experimental purposes: a practical guide for the plant biologist. , 2012, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[60]  M. M. Christ,et al.  Dynamics of seedling growth acclimation towards altered light conditions can be quantified via GROWSCREEN: a setup and procedure designed for rapid optical phenotyping of different plant species. , 2007, The New phytologist.