Additive and interactive effects in semantic priming: Isolating lexical and decision processes in the lexical decision task.

The present study sheds light on the interplay between lexical and decision processes in the lexical decision task by exploring the effects of lexical decision difficulty on semantic priming effects. In 2 experiments, we increased lexical decision difficulty by either using transposed letter wordlike nonword distracters (e.g., JUGDE; Experiment 1) or by visually degrading targets (Experiment 2). Although target latencies were considerably slowed by both difficulty manipulations, stimulus quality-but not nonword type-moderated priming effects, consistent with recent work by Lupker and Pexman (2010). To characterize these results in a more fine-grained manner, data were also analyzed at the level of response time (RT) distributions, using a combination of ex-Gaussian, quantile, and diffusion model analyses. The results indicate that for clear targets, priming was reflected by distributional shifting of comparable magnitude across different nonword types. In contrast, priming of degraded targets was reflected by shifting and an increase in the tail of the distribution. We discuss how these findings, along with others, can be accommodated by an embellished multistage activation model that incorporates retrospective prime retrieval and decision-based mechanisms.

[1]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Fitting distributions using maximum likelihood: Methods and packages , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[2]  Jeffrey N Rouder,et al.  A comment on Heathcote, Brown, and Mewhort’s QMLE method for response time distributions , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  W S Murray,et al.  Serial mechanisms in lexical access: the rank hypothesis. , 2004, Psychological review.

[4]  David A Balota,et al.  Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Thomas H. Killion,et al.  Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. , 1977 .

[7]  D. Balota,et al.  Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words , 2009 .

[8]  Andreas Voss,et al.  A fast numerical algorithm for the estimation of diffusion model parameters , 2008 .

[9]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. , 1994 .

[10]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Ron Borowsky,et al.  Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary? , 2006, Psychological review.

[12]  Dennis Norris,et al.  The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. , 2006, Psychological review.

[13]  P. L. Tenpenny,et al.  Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  S. Lupker,et al.  Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects? , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[15]  D. Besner,et al.  Constraints on computational models of basic processes in reading. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  J. Bowers Masked priming: State of the Art , 2003 .

[17]  D. Plaut,et al.  More modeling but still no stages: Reply to Borowsky and Besner , 2006 .

[18]  Glen E Bodner,et al.  Repetition proportion biases masked priming of lexical decisions , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Gary L. Dannenbring,et al.  Semantic priming and word repetition: The two effects are additive , 1985 .

[20]  Derek Besner,et al.  Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007). , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[22]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Basic Processes in Reading , 2013 .

[23]  C. T. James The Role of Semantic Information in Lexical Decisions. , 1975 .

[24]  Derek Besner,et al.  Role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as nonautomatic processes. , 1996 .

[25]  David A. Balota,et al.  Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming , 2008 .

[26]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .

[28]  Derek Besner,et al.  On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  How to say "no" to a nonword: a leaky competing accumulator model of lexical decision. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Chi-Shing Tse,et al.  Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency: The role of lexical integrity. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[31]  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia,et al.  NoA’s ark: Influence of the number of associates in visual word recognition , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  Current Directions in Psychological Science , 2009 .

[34]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .

[35]  SAUL SmWqBERG,et al.  THE DISCOVERY OF PROCESSING STAGES : EXTENSIONS OF NDERS ’ MET , 2002 .

[36]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[38]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[39]  James S. Adelman,et al.  Models and methods, orthography, and phonology , 2012 .

[40]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving Beyond the Mean in Studies of Mental Chronometry , 2011 .

[41]  S. Joordens,et al.  The long and short of semantic priming effects in lexical decision. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  M. C. Smith,et al.  Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. , 1992 .

[43]  Andreas Voss,et al.  Fast-dm: A free program for efficient diffusion model analysis , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[44]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A retrieval theory of priming in memory. , 1988, Psychological review.

[45]  D. Balota,et al.  Face (and nose) priming for book: the malleability of semantic memory. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[46]  H. Shulman,et al.  Control properties of semantic coding in a lexical decision task , 1977 .

[47]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  J. Juola,et al.  Strategic reliance on phonological mediation in lexical access , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[49]  Sally Andrews,et al.  From inkmarks to ideas : current issues in lexical processing , 2006 .

[50]  Derek Besner,et al.  Basic decoding components in reading: Two dissociable feature extraction processes. , 1983 .

[51]  W. C. Shipley A Self-Administering Scale for Measuring Intellectual Impairment and Deterioration , 1940 .

[52]  James L. McClelland On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[53]  D. Balota,et al.  Levels of selective attention revealed through analyses of response time distributions. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The meaning of additive reaction-time effects: some misconceptions , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[55]  Derek Besner,et al.  On the locus of the word frequency effect in visual word recognition , 1997 .

[56]  G. Stone,et al.  Strategic control of processing in word recognition. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  D. Plaut,et al.  Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. , 2000, Psychological review.

[58]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[59]  David A. Balota,et al.  Attentional Control and Flexible Lexical Processing : Explorations of the Magic Moment of Word Recognition , 2007 .

[60]  C. Perfetti,et al.  The lexical quality hypothesis , 2002 .

[61]  D. Geary,et al.  Psychonomic Bulletin Review , 2000 .

[62]  A. Heathcote,et al.  Reply to Speckman and Rouder: A theoretical basis for QML , 2004 .

[63]  D. Balota,et al.  Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: beyond measures of central tendency. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[64]  James H. Neely,et al.  When Word Identification Gets Tough, Retrospective Semantic Processing Comes to the Rescue. , 2012 .

[65]  M. Masson A distributed memory model of semantic priming. , 1995 .

[66]  S. Lupker,et al.  Making things difficult in lexical decision: the impact of pseudohomophones and transposed-letter nonwords on frequency and semantic priming effects. , 2010, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[67]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Semantic Context Effects on Visual Word Processing: A Hybrid Prospective-Retrospective Processing Theory , 1989 .

[68]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Tangible Words are Recognized Faster: The Grounding of Meaning in Sensory and Perceptual Systems , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[69]  David A. Balota,et al.  Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency revealed by RT distributional analyses: The role of lexical integrity , 2009 .

[70]  S. Sternberg Discovering mental processing stages: The method of additive factors. , 1998 .

[71]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[72]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[73]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Putting it all together: a unified account of word recognition and reaction-time distributions. , 2009, Psychological review.

[74]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? , 1987 .

[75]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Structure and Function in the Lexical System: Insights from Distributed Models of Word Reading and Lexical Decision , 1997 .

[76]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[77]  T. McNamara Semantic Priming: Perspectives from Memory and Word Recognition , 2005 .

[78]  S. Sternberg,et al.  The meaning of additive reaction-time effects: tests of three alternatives , 1993 .

[79]  David A. Balota,et al.  Single versus Dual Process Models of Lexical Decision Performance : Insights from RT Distributional Analysis , 2006 .

[80]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[81]  Adrian Staub,et al.  The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[82]  D. Besner,et al.  Visual word recognition: a multistage activation model. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[83]  G. Stone,et al.  Resolving Empirical Inconsistencies Concerning Priming, Frequency, and Nonword Foils in Lexical Decision , 1992, Language and speech.

[84]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Human memory: An adaptive perspective. , 1989 .

[85]  James H. Neely,et al.  When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. , 1995 .

[86]  R. Ratcliff Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[87]  Ron Borowsky,et al.  Postscript: Plaut and Booth's (2006) New Simulations--What Have We Learned?. , 2006 .

[88]  C. A. Becker Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[89]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[90]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[91]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: The body–object interaction effect , 2008, Cognition.

[92]  D. Besner,et al.  Levels of representation in visual word recognition: a dissociation between morphological and semantic processing. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[93]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-Letter Confusability Effects in Masked Form Priming , 2003 .

[94]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[95]  D. Besner,et al.  Dissociative effects of stimulus quality on semantic and morphological contexts in visual word recognition. , 2006, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[96]  Derek Besner,et al.  Models of Lexical Access in Visual Word Recognition , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[97]  D. Besner,et al.  Semantic priming: On the role of awareness in visual word recognition in the absence of an expectancy , 2002, Consciousness and Cognition.

[98]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. , 2004, Psychological review.

[99]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[100]  Robert F. Stanners,et al.  Frequency and visual quality in a word-nonword classification task , 1975 .

[101]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Deriving Exact Predictions From the Cascade Model , 1982 .

[102]  R A Abrams,et al.  Mental chronometry: beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[103]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[104]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance The Distribution of Fixation Durations During Reading : Effects of Stimulus Quality , 2011 .

[105]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Interaction of prime repetition with visual degradation: Is priming a retrieval phenomenon? , 1990 .

[106]  Rémy Versace,et al.  Word frequency effect on repetition priming as a function of prime duration and delay between the prime and the target. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[107]  May How to Say , 2005 .

[108]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[109]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[110]  M. Masson,et al.  Masked Repetition Priming of Words and Nonwords: Evidence for a Nonlexical Basis for Priming , 1997 .