On the coevolution of social responsiveness and behavioural consistency

Recent research focuses on animal personalities, that is individual differences in behaviour that are consistent across contexts and over time. From an adaptive perspective, such limited behavioural plasticity is surprising, since a more flexible structure of behaviour should provide a selective advantage. Here, we argue that consistency can be advantageous because it makes individuals predictable. Predictability, however, can only be advantageous if at least some individuals in the population respond to individual differences. Consequently, the evolution of consistency and responsiveness are mutually dependent. We present a general analysis of this coevolutionary feedback for scenarios that can be represented as matrix games with two pure strategies (e.g. hawk-dove game, snowdrift game). We first show that responsive strategies are favoured whenever some individual differences are present in the population (e.g. due to mutation and drift). We then show that the presence of responsive individuals can trigger a coevolutionary process between responsiveness and consistency that gives rise to populations in which responsive individuals coexist with unresponsive individuals who show high levels of adaptive consistency in their behaviour. Next to providing an adaptive explanation for consistency, our results also link two key features associated with personalities, individual differences in responsiveness and behavioural consistency.

[1]  R A Johnstone,et al.  Eavesdropping and animal conflict , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  The logic of asymmetric contests , 1976, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  E. Rolls.  Précis of The brain and emotion. , 2000, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[4]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[5]  S. Winberg,et al.  Genetically Determined Variation in Stress Responsiveness in Rainbow Trout: Behavior and Neurobiology , 2007, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[6]  P. R. Wiepkema,et al.  Consistent individual differences in early exploratory behaviour of male great tits , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  Andrew Sih,et al.  Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[9]  D. Réale,et al.  Energy metabolism and animal personality , 2008 .

[10]  E. Ketterson,et al.  Adaptation, Exaptation, and Constraint: A Hormonal Perspective , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Peter L. Hurd,et al.  Individual differences in cerebral lateralization are associated with shy–bold variation in the convict cichlid , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  F. Johansson,et al.  Conflicting selection pressures on the growth/predation risk trade-off in a damselfly , 2004 .

[13]  A. Sih,et al.  Precopulatory sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders (Dolomedes triton): a role for behavioral syndromes , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  Andrew Sih,et al.  Insights for Behavioral Ecology from Behavioral Syndromes. , 2008, Advances in the study of behavior.

[15]  C. Clark,et al.  Dynamic State Variable Models in Ecology , 2000 .

[16]  Trudy F C Mackay,et al.  The genetic architecture of quantitative traits: lessons from Drosophila. , 2004, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[17]  A. Bond.  Neurotransmitters, temperament and social functioning , 2001, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[18]  David Sloan Wilson,et al.  Adaptive individual differences within single populations. , 1998 .

[19]  B. Taborsky,et al.  Environmental Change Enhances Cognitive Abilities in Fish , 2010, PLoS biology.

[20]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  The behavioural ecology of personality: consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective , 2004 .

[21]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  Evolutionary emergence of responsive and unresponsive personalities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Variation in behaviour promotes cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma game , 2004, Nature.

[23]  Franz J Weissing,et al.  An explanatory framework for adaptive personality differences , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  E. Bennett,et al.  Psychobiology of plasticity: effects of training and experience on brain and behavior , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[25]  G. Beauchamp.  Consistency and flexibility in the scrounging behaviour of zebra finches , 2001 .

[26]  J. Armstrong,et al.  Juvenile salmon with high standard metabolic rates have higher energy costs but can process meals faster , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  A. Sih,et al.  Behavioural correlations across situations and the evolution of antipredator behaviour in a sunfish–salamander system , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  A. Sih,et al.  Behavioral Syndromes: An Integrative Overview , 2004, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[29]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Evolution of trust and trustworthiness: social awareness favours personality differences , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  C. Hauert,et al.  Models of cooperation based on the Prisoner's Dilemma and the Snowdrift game , 2005 .

[31]  S. Riechert,et al.  A test for correlations among fitness-linked behavioural traits in the spider Agelenopsis aperta (Araneae, Agelenidae) , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Fitness consequences of avian personalities in a fluctuating environment , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  A. Aron,et al.  Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  D. E. Matthews.  Evolution and the Theory of Games , 1977 .

[35]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Recent models for adaptive personality differences: a review , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  P. R. Wiepkema,et al.  Individual behavioral and physiological strategies in pigs , 1994, Physiology & Behavior.

[37]  P. Hammerstein.  The role of asymmetries in animal contests , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  A. Houston,et al.  State-dependent life histories , 1996, Nature.

[39]  S. D. de Boer,et al.  Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology , 1999, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[40]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Experimental evidence that group foragers can converge on predicted producer–scrounger equilibria , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  J. Stamps,et al.  Are Animal Personality Traits Linked to Life-history Productivity? , 2022 .

[42]  A. Houston,et al.  The coevolution of choosiness and cooperation , 2008, Nature.

[43]  Sean A. Rands,et al.  Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs , 2003, Nature.

[44]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  Evolutionary stability and dynamic stability in a class of evolutionary normal form games , 1991 .

[45]  A. Houston,et al.  Models of adaptive behaviour , 1999 .

[46]  P M Todd,et al.  Précis of Simple heuristics that make us smart , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[47]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  Sexual cannibalism in the fishing spider and a model for the evolution of sexual cannibalism based on genetic constraints , 1997, Evolutionary Ecology.