Robotic Transperitoneal Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecologic Cancer: A New Robotic Surgical Technique and Review of the Literature

BackgroundLymph node status is a prognostic factor for gynecologic cancer. We describe a new developing strategy for robotic transperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy without relocating the robotic column or the patient.MethodsPatients with histologically confirmed cervical cancer, early ovarian cancer, or endometrial carcinoma with suspected risk factors indicating aortic lymphadenectomy were eligible for the robotic transperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy using the Da Vinci robotic system as part of the surgical treatment of gynecologic malignancies.ResultsThe mean operating time was 224 min (range 160–300 min), and the mean console time for aortic lymphadenectomy was 43 min (range 30–75). The median hemoglobin fall was 1.3 g/dL range (0.8–2 g/dL), the median number of removed aortic lymph nodes was 12.5 (range 7–17), and the median length of the hospital stay was 2 days (range 1–4 days). We experienced an intraoperative complication, but no conversion to laparotomy was necessary. No patients received a blood transfusion.ConclusionsThis initial experience demonstrates the feasibility of robotic aortic lymphadenectomy with good accuracy and safety without relocating the robotic column or the patient.

[1]  J. Magrina,et al.  Pelvic and aortic lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer. , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.

[2]  Nazia Sultana,et al.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance. , 2009, Gynecologic oncology.

[3]  Andrea Mariani,et al.  Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm shift in surgical staging. , 2008, Gynecologic oncology.

[4]  P. Neven,et al.  Robotic retroperitoneal lower para‐aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma: First report on the technique used in 5 patients , 2008, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[5]  D. Cohn,et al.  Robotic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: the console surgeon's perspectives on surgical technique and directing the assistant. , 2010, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[6]  M. Bell,et al.  Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. , 2008, Gynecologic oncology.

[7]  V. Zanagnolo,et al.  Robotic transperitoneal infrarenal aortic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancy: a left lateral approach. , 2011, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[8]  G. Houvenaeghel,et al.  Early experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopy for extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the left renal vein. , 2009, Gynecologic oncology.

[9]  R. Tozzi,et al.  Laparoscopic paraaortic left-sided transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with gynecologic malignancies: technique and results. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[10]  S. Maeso,et al.  Meta‐analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery , 2010, The British journal of surgery.

[11]  J. Magrina,et al.  Robotic Transperitoneal Infrarenal Aortic Lymphadenectomy: Technique and Results , 2009, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[12]  M. Degueldre,et al.  Robot assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the management of advanced cervical carcinoma. , 2009, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[13]  C. Fournier,et al.  Therapeutic value of pretherapeutic extraperitoneal laparoscopic staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.

[14]  K. Hatch,et al.  Laparoscopic para‐aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies , 1993, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  D. Miller,et al.  The Role of Lymphadenectomy in Endometrial Cancer , 2011, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.