Initial explorations into the user experience of 3D file browsing

We present an initial exploration into the usability of 3D file browsing. To explore the 3D file browsing technique design space, we analyzed the existing literature and developed three representative 3D file browsing techniques that cover many of their characteristics. Block3D uses a priority weighting scheme to elevate and display files in a grid-based structure. Cluster3D uses sets of animated racks to display files. LTreeCube3D visualizes files and directories using groups of semi-transparent cubes within a larger cube-like structure. We conducted an experiment exploring the affect these 3D file browsing technique have on users in a manual file searching task. Our evaluation is based on task completion time and a post-questionnaire used to gather subjective feedback on each technique in terms of user preference. The results indicate that users completed the manual file search task significantly faster using Block3D than both LTreeCube3D and Cluster3D. Although subjective ranking showed users preferred the Block3D technique, user feedback also showed merits of the other techniques.

[1]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Tree visualization with tree-maps: 2-d space-filling approach , 1992, TOGS.

[2]  Andy Cockburn,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial memory in 2D and 3D physical and virtual environments , 2002, CHI.

[3]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Emotional design , 2004, UBIQ.

[4]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[5]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Data mountain: using spatial memory for document management , 1998, UIST '98.

[6]  Yoshihiro Okada,et al.  Treecube+3D-ViSOM: Combinational Visualization Tool for Browsing 3D Multimedia Data , 2007, 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV '07).

[7]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  An initial examination of ease of use for 2D and 3D information visualizations of web content , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  D. P. Reed,et al.  Croquet: a menagerie of new user interfaces , 2004 .

[9]  Bertin Klein,et al.  Human-centered interaction with documents , 2006, HCM '06.

[10]  Achim Ebert,et al.  2D meets 3D: a human-centered interface for visual data exploration , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[11]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[12]  Patrick Baudisch,et al.  Keeping things in context: a comparative evaluation of focus plus context screens, overviews, and zooming , 2002, CHI.

[13]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Pad++: a zooming graphical interface for exploring alternate interface physics , 1994, UIST '94.

[14]  G. W. Furnas,et al.  Generalized fisheye views , 1986, CHI '86.

[15]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  The Task Gallery: a 3D window manager , 2000, CHI.

[16]  Mats Lind,et al.  2D vs 3D, implications on spatial memory , 2001, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2001. INFOVIS 2001..

[17]  Andy Cockburn,et al.  Revisiting 2D vs 3D Implications on Spatial Memory , 2004, AUIC.

[18]  Yoshihiro Okada,et al.  Interactive interfaces of Treecube for browsing 3D multimedia data , 2004, AVI.

[19]  Bin Zhu,et al.  Using 3D interfaces to facilitate the spatial knowledge retrieval: a geo-referenced knowledge repository system , 2005, Decis. Support Syst..